UMB@PerAnsSumm 2025: Enhancing Perspective-Aware Summarization with Prompt Optimization and Supervised Fine-Tuning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11118v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 06:29:51 GMT
• Title: UMB@PerAnsSumm 2025: Enhancing Perspective-Aware Summarization with Prompt Optimization and Supervised Fine-Tuning
• Authors: Kristin Qi, Youxiang Zhu, Xiaohui Liang,
• Abstract summary: We present our approach to the PerAnsSumm Shared Task, which involves perspective span identification and perspective-aware summarization.<n>For span identification, we adopt ensemble learning that integrates three transformer models through averaging to exploit individual model strengths.<n>For summarization, we design a suite of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting strategies that incorporate keyphrases and guide information to structure summary generation into manageable steps.
• Score: 8.095763327154335
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present our approach to the PerAnsSumm Shared Task, which involves perspective span identification and perspective-aware summarization in community question-answering (CQA) threads. For span identification, we adopt ensemble learning that integrates three transformer models through averaging to exploit individual model strengths, achieving an 82.91% F1-score on test data. For summarization, we design a suite of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting strategies that incorporate keyphrases and guide information to structure summary generation into manageable steps. To further enhance summary quality, we apply prompt optimization using the DSPy framework and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on Llama-3 to adapt the model to domain-specific data. Experimental results on validation and test sets show that structured prompts with keyphrases and guidance improve summaries aligned with references, while the combination of prompt optimization and fine-tuning together yields significant improvement in both relevance and factuality evaluation metrics.

Related papers

• Light-IF: Endowing LLMs with Generalizable Reasoning via Preview and Self-Checking for Complex Instruction Following [10.119219532863767]
  lazy reasoning during the thinking stage is the primary factor contributing to poor instruction adherence.<n>We propose a comprehensive framework designed to enable rigorous reasoning processes involving preview and self-checking.<n>Our Light-IF-32B model surpasses both larger open-source models such as DeepSeek-R1 and closed-source models like Doubao-1.6.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T07:42:00Z)
• A Novel Self-Evolution Framework for Large Language Models [18.62332474172811]
  We propose a novel Dual-Phase Self-Evolution framework to jointly optimize user preference adaptation and domain-specific competence.<n>Experiments across general NLP benchmarks and long-term dialogue tasks demonstrate that DPSE consistently outperforms Supervised Fine-Tuning, Preference Optimization, and Memory-Augmented baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T06:30:39Z)
• SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling [70.01883340129204]
  Single-Pass.<n>with Reference-Guided Evaluation (SPARE)<n>Novel structured framework that enables single-pass, per-step annotation by aligning each solution step to one or multiple steps in a reference solution, accompanied by explicit reasoning for evaluation.<n>SPARE achieves competitive performance on challenging mathematical datasets while offering 2.6 times greater efficiency, requiring only 38% of the runtime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T14:37:59Z)
• Syntactic Control of Language Models by Posterior Inference [53.823006836309695]
  Controlling the syntactic structure of text generated by language models is valuable for applications requiring clarity, stylistic consistency, or interpretability.<n>We argue that sampling algorithms based on the posterior inference can effectively enforce a target constituency structure during generation.<n>Our approach combines sequential Monte Carlo, which estimates the posterior distribution by sampling from a proposal distribution, with a syntactic tagger that ensures that each generated token aligns with the desired syntactic structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T14:01:34Z)
• Mind the Gap: Bridging Thought Leap for Improved Chain-of-Thought Tuning [54.65050470296886]
  We propose the CoT Thought Leap Bridge Task, which aims to automatically detect leaps and generate missing intermediate reasoning steps.<n>We demonstrate that models fine-tuned on bridged datasets consistently outperform those trained on original datasets.<n>Our approach effectively enhances distilled data and provides better starting points for reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T17:59:31Z)
• Review, Refine, Repeat: Understanding Iterative Decoding of AI Agents with Dynamic Evaluation and Selection [71.92083784393418]
  Inference-time methods such as Best-of-N (BON) sampling offer a simple yet effective alternative to improve performance. We propose Iterative Agent Decoding (IAD) which combines iterative refinement with dynamic candidate evaluation and selection guided by a verifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T17:40:47Z)
• Multi2: Multi-Agent Test-Time Scalable Framework for Multi-Document Processing [35.686125031177234]
  Multi-Document Summarization (MDS) is a challenging task that focuses on extracting and synthesizing useful information from multiple lengthy documents.<n>We propose a novel framework that leverages inference-time scaling for this task.<n>We also introduce two new evaluation metrics: Consistency-Aware Preference (CAP) score and LLM Atom-Content-Unit (ACU) score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T23:34:47Z)
• TD3: Tucker Decomposition Based Dataset Distillation Method for Sequential Recommendation [50.23504065567638]
  This paper introduces textbfTD3, a novel textbfDataset textbfDistillation method within a meta-learning framework. TD3 distills a fully expressive emphsynthetic sequence summary from original data. An augmentation technique allows the learner to closely fit the synthetic summary, ensuring an accurate update of it in the emphouter-loop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T03:13:25Z)
• Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training [81.4748965653345]
  We propose Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training (AITP) to align instruction tuning with pre-training distributions.<n>We show consistent performance improvements with AITP on three fully open large language models (LLMs) across eight benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T08:27:40Z)
• A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following [83.71180850955679]
  We use a novel synthetic data generation pipeline to generate 48,000 instruction unique-following prompts.<n>With our synthetic prompts, we use two preference dataset curation methods - rejection sampling (RS) and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)<n>Experiments reveal that shared prefixes in preference pairs, as generated by MCTS, provide marginal but consistent improvements.<n>High-contrast preference pairs generally outperform low-contrast pairs; however, combining both often yields the best performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T15:38:39Z)
• Anchored Alignment for Self-Explanations Enhancement [10.322090458234735]
  We introduce a methodology for alignment designed to enhance the ability of large language models to articulate their reasoning. Our methodology comprises three key components: explanation quality assessment, self-instruction dataset generation, and model alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T04:42:48Z)
• In-context Demonstration Matters: On Prompt Optimization for Pseudo-Supervision Refinement [71.60563181678323]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved great success across diverse tasks, and fine-tuning is sometimes needed to further enhance generation quality.<n>To handle these challenges, a direct solution is to generate high-confidence'' data from unsupervised downstream tasks.<n>We propose a novel approach, pseudo-supervised demonstrations aligned prompt optimization (PAPO) algorithm, which jointly refines both the prompt and the overall pseudo-supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T03:39:28Z)
• Self-Supervised Representation Learning with Meta Comprehensive Regularization [11.387994024747842]
  We introduce a module called CompMod with Meta Comprehensive Regularization (MCR), embedded into existing self-supervised frameworks. We update our proposed model through a bi-level optimization mechanism, enabling it to capture comprehensive features. We provide theoretical support for our proposed method from information theory and causal counterfactual perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T15:53:48Z)
• One-Shot Learning as Instruction Data Prospector for Large Language Models [108.81681547472138]
  textscNuggets uses one-shot learning to select high-quality instruction data from extensive datasets. We show that instruction tuning with the top 1% of examples curated by textscNuggets substantially outperforms conventional methods employing the entire dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T03:33:12Z)
• Consistency-guided Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models [23.4909421082857]
  We propose Consistency-guided Prompt learning (CoPrompt), a new fine-tuning method for vision-language models. Our approach improves the generalization of large foundation models when fine-tuned on downstream tasks in a few-shot setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T23:20:47Z)
• StructGPT: A General Framework for Large Language Model to Reason over Structured Data [117.13986738340027]
  We develop an emphIterative Reading-then-Reasoning(IRR) approach for solving question answering tasks based on structured data. Our approach can significantly boost the performance of ChatGPT and achieve comparable performance against the full-data supervised-tuning baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T17:45:23Z)
• News Summarization and Evaluation in the Era of GPT-3 [73.48220043216087]
  We study how GPT-3 compares against fine-tuned models trained on large summarization datasets. We show that not only do humans overwhelmingly prefer GPT-3 summaries, prompted using only a task description, but these also do not suffer from common dataset-specific issues such as poor factuality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T01:04:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.