Finding a Fair Scoring Function for Top-$k$ Selection: Hardness, Algorithms, and Experiments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11575v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:40:36 GMT
• Title: Finding a Fair Scoring Function for Top-$k$ Selection: Hardness, Algorithms, and Experiments
• Authors: Guangya Cai,
• Abstract summary: We consider the problem of identifying a linear scoring function for top-$k$ selection that is fair.<n>The function computes a score for each item as a weighted sum of its (numerical) attribute values.<n>Existing algorithms do not scale effectively on large, high-dimensional datasets.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Selecting a subset of the $k$ "best" items from a dataset of $n$ items, based on a scoring function, is a key task in decision-making. Given the widespread use of automated decision-making software nowadays, it is important that the outcome of this process, called top-$k$ selection, is fair. Here we consider the problem of identifying a linear scoring function for top-$k$ selection that is fair. The function computes a score for each item as a weighted sum of its (numerical) attribute values. Additionally, the function must ensure that the subset selected is a faithful representative of the entire dataset for a minority or historically disadvantaged group. Existing algorithms do not scale effectively on large, high-dimensional datasets. Our theoretical analysis shows that in more than two dimensions, no algorithm is likely to achieve good scalability with respect to dataset size (i.e., a run time of $O(n\cdot \text{polylog}(n))$), and the computational complexity is likely to increase rapidly with dimensionality. However, there are exceptions for small values of $k$ and for this case we provide significantly faster algorithms. We also provide efficient practical variants of these algorithms. Our implementations of these take advantage of modern hardware (e.g., exploiting parallelism). For large values of $k$, we give an alternative algorithm that, while theoretically worse, performs better in practice. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate the efficiency of our proposed algorithms, which achieve speed-ups of up to several orders of magnitude compared to the state of the art (SoTA).

Related papers

• Scalable Private Partition Selection via Adaptive Weighting [66.09199304818928]
  In a private set union, users hold subsets of items from an unbounded universe.<n>The goal is to output as many items as possible from the union of the users' sets while maintaining user-level differential privacy.<n>We propose an algorithm for this problem, MaximumDegree (MAD), which adaptively reroutes weight from items with weight far above the threshold needed for privacy to items with smaller weight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T01:27:11Z)
• Approximate Top-$k$ for Increased Parallelism [1.2557921586915128]
  We present an evaluation of bucketed approximate top-$k$ algorithms. By relaxing the requirement that the top-$k$ is exact, bucketed algorithms can dramatically increase the parallelism available. We also release a fast bucketed top-$k$ implementation for PyTorch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T17:17:28Z)
• Efficient Budget Allocation for Large-Scale LLM-Enabled Virtual Screening [0.9558392439655016]
  We consider an LLM-as-human-evaluator approach for conducting screening virtually, thereby reducing the cost burden.<n>We propose using a top-$m$ greedy evaluation mechanism, and design the explore-first top-$m$ greedy (EFG-$m$) algorithm.<n>Surprisingly, we uncover a bonus ranking effect, where the algorithm naturally induces an indifference-based ranking within the selected subset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-18T16:44:41Z)
• Identifying Easy Instances to Improve Efficiency of ML Pipelines for Algorithm-Selection [0.20718016474717196]
  We propose a method for identifying easy instances which can be solved quickly using a generalist solver without any need for algorithm-selection. This saves computational budget associated with feature-computation which can then be used elsewhere in an AS pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T12:25:04Z)
• The Limits of Assumption-free Tests for Algorithm Performance [6.7171902258864655]
  How well does an algorithm perform at a given modeling task, and which algorithm performs best? We make a distinction between two questions: how good is an algorithm $A$ at the problem of learning from a training set of size $n$, versus, how good is a particular fitted model produced by running $A$ on a particular training data set of size $n$?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T03:19:30Z)
• A Weighted K-Center Algorithm for Data Subset Selection [70.49696246526199]
  Subset selection is a fundamental problem that can play a key role in identifying smaller portions of the training data. We develop a novel factor 3-approximation algorithm to compute subsets based on the weighted sum of both k-center and uncertainty sampling objective functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-17T04:41:07Z)
• Representation Learning with Multi-Step Inverse Kinematics: An Efficient and Optimal Approach to Rich-Observation RL [106.82295532402335]
  Existing reinforcement learning algorithms suffer from computational intractability, strong statistical assumptions, and suboptimal sample complexity. We provide the first computationally efficient algorithm that attains rate-optimal sample complexity with respect to the desired accuracy level. Our algorithm, MusIK, combines systematic exploration with representation learning based on multi-step inverse kinematics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-12T14:51:47Z)
• Subset-Based Instance Optimality in Private Estimation [23.173651165908282]
  We show how to construct private algorithms that achieve our notion of instance optimality when estimating a broad class of dataset properties. Our algorithm simultaneously matches or exceeds the performance of existing algorithms under a range of distributional assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T18:49:10Z)
• Deterministic Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization [94.01526844386977]
  We show that randomization is necessary to obtain a dimension-free dimension-free algorithm. Our algorithm yields the first deterministic dimension-free algorithm for optimizing ReLU networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T13:57:19Z)
• Max-Min Diversification with Fairness Constraints: Exact and Approximation Algorithms [17.57585822765145]
  We propose an exact algorithm that is suitable for small datasets as well as a $frac1-varepsilon integer integer5$-approximation algorithm for any $varepsilon in (0, 1)$ that scales to large datasets. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed algorithms over existing ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T13:02:35Z)
• Compactness Score: A Fast Filter Method for Unsupervised Feature Selection [66.84571085643928]
  We propose a fast unsupervised feature selection method, named as, Compactness Score (CSUFS) to select desired features. Our proposed algorithm seems to be more accurate and efficient compared with existing algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T13:01:37Z)
• Bayesian Algorithm Execution: Estimating Computable Properties of Black-box Functions Using Mutual Information [78.78486761923855]
  In many real world problems, we want to infer some property of an expensive black-box function f, given a budget of T function evaluations. We present a procedure, InfoBAX, that sequentially chooses queries that maximize mutual information with respect to the algorithm's output. On these problems, InfoBAX uses up to 500 times fewer queries to f than required by the original algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T17:22:11Z)
• Test Score Algorithms for Budgeted Stochastic Utility Maximization [12.360522095604983]
  We extend an existing scoring mechanism, namely the replication test scores, to incorporate heterogeneous item costs as well as item values. Our algorithms and approximation guarantees assume that test scores are noisy estimates of certain expected values. We show how our algorithm can be adapted to the setting where items arrive in a fashion while maintaining the same approximation guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T15:28:41Z)
• Online Model Selection for Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation [50.008542459050155]
  We present a meta-algorithm that adapts to the optimal complexity with $tildeO(L5/6 T2/3)$ regret. We also show that the meta-algorithm automatically admits significantly improved instance-dependent regret bounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T10:00:54Z)
• Adaptive Sampling for Best Policy Identification in Markov Decision Processes [79.4957965474334]
  We investigate the problem of best-policy identification in discounted Markov Decision (MDPs) when the learner has access to a generative model. The advantages of state-of-the-art algorithms are discussed and illustrated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T15:22:24Z)
• An Efficient $k$-modes Algorithm for Clustering Categorical Datasets [8.528384027684194]
  We provide a novel, computationally efficient implementation of $k$-modes, called OTQT. We prove that OTQT finds updates to improve the objective function that are undetectable to existing $k$-modes algorithms. OTQT is always more accurate per iteration and almost always faster (and only barely slower on some datasets) to the final optimum.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-06T18:41:36Z)
• Ranking a set of objects: a graph based least-square approach [70.7866286425868]
  We consider the problem of ranking $N$ objects starting from a set of noisy pairwise comparisons provided by a crowd of equal workers. We propose a class of non-adaptive ranking algorithms that rely on a least-squares intrinsic optimization criterion for the estimation of qualities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-26T16:19:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.