Banking on Feedback: Text Analysis of Mobile Banking iOS and Google App Reviews

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11861v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 20:41:17 GMT
• Title: Banking on Feedback: Text Analysis of Mobile Banking iOS and Google App Reviews
• Authors: Yekta Amirkhalili, Ho Yi Wong,
• Abstract summary: This study analyzes consumer reviews of m-banking apps from five major Canadian banks, collected from Google Play and iOS App stores.<n>Positive reviews praised usability, reliability, and features, while negative reviews identified login issues, glitches, and dissatisfaction with updates.<n>Findings underscore the importance of user-friendly designs, stable updates, and better customer service.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid growth of mobile banking (m-banking), especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, has reshaped the financial sector. This study analyzes consumer reviews of m-banking apps from five major Canadian banks, collected from Google Play and iOS App stores. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling classify reviews as positive, neutral, or negative, highlighting user preferences and areas for improvement. Data pre-processing was performed with NLTK, a Python language processing tool, and topic modeling used Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). Sentiment analysis compared methods, with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) achieving 82\% accuracy for iOS reviews and Multinomial Naive Bayes 77\% for Google Play. Positive reviews praised usability, reliability, and features, while negative reviews identified login issues, glitches, and dissatisfaction with updates.This is the first study to analyze both iOS and Google Play m-banking app reviews, offering insights into app strengths and weaknesses. Findings underscore the importance of user-friendly designs, stable updates, and better customer service. Advanced text analytics provide actionable recommendations for improving user satisfaction and experience.

Related papers

• LazyReview A Dataset for Uncovering Lazy Thinking in NLP Peer Reviews [74.87393214734114]
  This work introduces LazyReview, a dataset of peer-review sentences annotated with fine-grained lazy thinking categories. Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to detect these instances in a zero-shot setting. instruction-based fine-tuning on our dataset significantly boosts performance by 10-20 performance points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T10:07:33Z)
• Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025 [115.86204862475864]
  Review Feedback Agent provides automated feedback on vague comments, content misunderstandings, and unprofessional remarks to reviewers. It was implemented at ICLR 2025 as a large randomized control study. 27% of reviewers who received feedback updated their reviews, and over 12,000 feedback suggestions from the agent were incorporated by those reviewers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T22:01:25Z)
• Prioritizing App Reviews for Developer Responses on Google Play [1.5771347525430772]
  Since 2013, Google Play has allowed developers to respond to user reviews.<n>Only 13% to 18% of developers engage in this practice.<n>We propose a method to prioritize reviews based on response priority.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T16:56:08Z)
• Fairness Concerns in App Reviews: A Study on AI-based Mobile Apps [9.948068408730654]
  This research aims to investigate fairness concerns raised in mobile app reviews. Our research focuses on AI-based mobile app reviews as the chance of unfair behaviors and outcomes in AI-based apps may be higher than in non-AI-based apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T03:43:33Z)
• UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback [99.4633351133207]
  We present textscUltraFeedback, a large-scale, high-quality, and diversified AI feedback dataset. Our work validates the effectiveness of scaled AI feedback data in constructing strong open-source chat language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T17:40:01Z)
• Proactive Prioritization of App Issues via Contrastive Learning [2.6763498831034043]
  We propose a new framework, PPrior, that enables proactive prioritization of app issues through identifying prominent reviews. PPrior employs a pre-trained T5 model and works in three phases. Phase one adapts the pre-trained T5 model to the user reviews data in a self-supervised fashion. Phase two, we leverage contrastive training to learn a generic and task-independent representation of user reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-12T06:23:10Z)
• On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspective [67.98821225810204]
  We evaluate the robustness of ChatGPT from the adversarial and out-of-distribution perspective. Results show consistent advantages on most adversarial and OOD classification and translation tasks. ChatGPT shows astounding performance in understanding dialogue-related texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T11:01:20Z)
• Proactive Detractor Detection Framework Based on Message-Wise Sentiment Analysis Over Customer Support Interactions [60.87845704495664]
  We propose a framework relying solely on chat-based customer support interactions for predicting the recommendation decision of individual users. For our case study, we analyzed a total number of 16.4k users and 48.7k customer support conversations within the financial vertical of a large e-commerce company in Latin America. Our results show that, with respective feature interpretability, it is possible to predict the likelihood of a user to recommend a product or service, based solely on the message-wise sentiment evolution of their CS conversations in a fully automated way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-08T00:43:36Z)
• SentiLSTM: A Deep Learning Approach for Sentiment Analysis of Restaurant Reviews [13.018530502810128]
  This paper proposes, a deep learning-based technique (i.e., BiLSTM) to classify the reviews provided by the clients of the restaurant into positive and negative polarities. The results of the evaluation on test dataset show that BiLSTM technique produced in the highest accuracy of 91.35%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T06:24:42Z)
• Emerging App Issue Identification via Online Joint Sentiment-Topic Tracing [66.57888248681303]
  We propose a novel emerging issue detection approach named MERIT. Based on the AOBST model, we infer the topics negatively reflected in user reviews for one app version. Experiments on popular apps from Google Play and Apple's App Store demonstrate the effectiveness of MERIT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-23T06:34:05Z)
• Automating App Review Response Generation [67.58267006314415]
  We propose a novel approach RRGen that automatically generates review responses by learning knowledge relations between reviews and their responses. Experiments on 58 apps and 309,246 review-response pairs highlight that RRGen outperforms the baselines by at least 67.4% in terms of BLEU-4.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-10T05:23:38Z)
• IART: Intent-aware Response Ranking with Transformers in Information-seeking Conversation Systems [80.0781718687327]
  We analyze user intent patterns in information-seeking conversations and propose an intent-aware neural response ranking model "IART" IART is built on top of the integration of user intent modeling and language representation learning with the Transformer architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-03T05:59:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.