Evaluating the Application of SOLID Principles in Modern AI Framework Architectures

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13786v2
• Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 17:23:26 GMT
• Title: Evaluating the Application of SOLID Principles in Modern AI Framework Architectures
• Authors: Jonesh Shrestha,
• Abstract summary: This research evaluates the extent to which modern AI frameworks, specifically scikit-learn, adhere to the SOLID design principles.<n>I examined each frameworks documentation, source code, and architectural components to evaluate their adherence to these principles.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This research evaluates the extent to which modern AI frameworks, specifically TensorFlow and scikit-learn, adhere to the SOLID design principles - Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, and Dependency Inversion. Analyzing the frameworks architectural documentation and design philosophies, this research investigates architectural trade-offs when balancing software engineering best practices with AI-specific needs. I examined each frameworks documentation, source code, and architectural components to evaluate their adherence to these principles. The results show that both frameworks adopt certain aspects of SOLID design principles but make intentional trade-offs to address performance, scalability, and the experimental nature of AI development. TensorFlow focuses on performance and scalability, sometimes sacrificing strict adherence to principles like Single Responsibility and Interface Segregation. While scikit-learns design philosophy aligns more closely with SOLID principles through consistent interfaces and composition principles, sticking closer to SOLID guidelines but with occasional deviations for performance optimizations and scalability. This research discovered that applying SOLID principles in AI frameworks depends on context, as performance, scalability, and flexibility often require deviations from traditional software engineering principles. This research contributes to understanding how domain-specific constraints influence architectural decisions in modern AI frameworks and how these frameworks strategically adapted design choices to effectively balance these contradicting requirements.

Related papers

• SENAI: Towards Software Engineering Native Generative Artificial Intelligence [3.915435754274075]
  This paper argues for the integration of Software Engineering knowledge into Large Language Models. The aim is to propose a new direction where LLMs can move beyond mere functional accuracy to perform generative tasks. Software engineering native generative models will not only overcome the shortcomings present in current models but also pave the way for the next generation of generative models capable of handling real-world software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T15:02:07Z)
• Towards Developing Ethical Reasoners: Integrating Probabilistic Reasoning and Decision-Making for Complex AI Systems [4.854297874710511]
  A computational ethics framework is essential for AI and autonomous systems operating in complex, real-world environments.<n>Existing approaches often lack the adaptability needed to integrate ethical principles into dynamic and ambiguous contexts.<n>We outline the necessary ingredients for building a holistic, meta-level framework that combines intermediate representations, probabilistic reasoning, and knowledge representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T17:25:11Z)
• Understanding the differences in Foundation Models: Attention, State Space Models, and Recurrent Neural Networks [50.29356570858905]
  We introduce the Dynamical Systems Framework (DSF), which allows a principled investigation of all these architectures in a common representation. We provide principled comparisons between softmax attention and other model classes, discussing the theoretical conditions under which softmax attention can be approximated. This shows the DSF's potential to guide the systematic development of future more efficient and scalable foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T17:19:57Z)
• SymbolicAI: A framework for logic-based approaches combining generative models and solvers [9.841285581456722]
  We introduce SymbolicAI, a versatile and modular framework employing a logic-based approach to concept learning and flow management in generative processes. We treat large language models (LLMs) as semantic solvers that execute tasks based on both natural and formal language instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:50:50Z)
• Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI [64.59151650272477]
  We propose a framework for classifying the capabilities and behavior of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models and their precursors. This framework introduces levels of AGI performance, generality, and autonomy, providing a common language to compare models, assess risks, and measure progress along the path to AGI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-04T17:44:58Z)
• A Rapid Review of Responsible AI frameworks: How to guide the development of ethical AI [1.3734044451150018]
  We conduct a rapid review of several frameworks providing principles, guidelines, and/or tools to help practitioners in the development and deployment of Responsible AI (RAI) applications. Our results reveal that there is not a "catching-all" framework supporting both technical and non-technical stakeholders in the implementation of real-world projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:47:18Z)
• A multidomain relational framework to guide institutional AI research and adoption [0.0]
  We argue that research efforts aimed at understanding the implications of adopting AI tend to prioritize only a handful of ideas. We propose a simple policy and research design tool in the form of a conceptual framework to organize terms across fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T16:33:01Z)
• Hierarchical Optimization-Derived Learning [58.69200830655009]
  We establish a new framework, named Hierarchical ODL (HODL), to simultaneously investigate the intrinsic behaviors of optimization-derived model construction and its corresponding learning process. This is the first theoretical guarantee for these two coupled ODL components: optimization and learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T03:35:13Z)
• elBERto: Self-supervised Commonsense Learning for Question Answering [131.51059870970616]
  We propose a Self-supervised Bidirectional Representation Learning of Commonsense framework, which is compatible with off-the-shelf QA model architectures. The framework comprises five self-supervised tasks to force the model to fully exploit the additional training signals from contexts containing rich commonsense. elBERto achieves substantial improvements on out-of-paragraph and no-effect questions where simple lexical similarity comparison does not help.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T16:23:45Z)
• Investigating Bi-Level Optimization for Learning and Vision from a Unified Perspective: A Survey and Beyond [114.39616146985001]
  In machine learning and computer vision fields, despite the different motivations and mechanisms, a lot of complex problems contain a series of closely related subproblms. In this paper, we first uniformly express these complex learning and vision problems from the perspective of Bi-Level Optimization (BLO) Then we construct a value-function-based single-level reformulation and establish a unified algorithmic framework to understand and formulate mainstream gradient-based BLO methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T16:20:23Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Flexibility Design Problems [77.37213643948108]
  We develop a reinforcement learning framework for flexibility design problems. Empirical results show that the RL-based method consistently finds better solutions than classical methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T02:44:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.