Decentralization: A Qualitative Survey of Node Operators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17246v2
• Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 16:59:07 GMT
• Title: Decentralization: A Qualitative Survey of Node Operators
• Authors: Alex Lynham, Geoff Goodell,
• Abstract summary: We solicit definitions of 'decentralization' and 'decentralization theatre' from blockchain node operators.<n>We find that most operators conceive decentralization as existing broadly on a technical and a governance axis.<n>Our key finding is that decentralization' alone does not affect ledger immutability or systemic robustness.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Decentralization is understood both by professionals in the blockchain industry and general users as a core design goal of permissionless ledgers. However, its meaning is far from universally agreed, and often it is easier to get opinions on what it is not, rather than what it is. In this paper, we solicit definitions of 'decentralization' and 'decentralization theatre' from blockchain node operators. Key to a definition is asking about effective decentralization strategies, as well as those that are ineffective, sometimes deliberately so. Malicious, deceptive, or incompetent strategies are commonly referred to by the term 'decentralization theatre.' Finally, we ask what is being decentralized. Via thematic analysis of interview transcripts, we find that most operators conceive decentralization as existing broadly on a technical and a governance axis. Isolating relevant variables, we collapse the categories to network topology and governance topology, or the structure of decision-making power. Our key finding is that `decentralization' alone does not affect ledger immutability or systemic robustness.

Related papers

• Decentralized Credential Status Management: A Paradigm Shift in Digital Trust [0.0]
  Public key infrastructures are essential for Internet security, ensuring robust certificate management and revocation mechanisms. The transition from centralized to decentralized systems presents challenges such as trust distribution and privacy-preserving credential management. This paper explores the evolution of certificate status management from centralized to decentralized frameworks, focusing on blockchain technology and advanced cryptography.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T13:17:56Z)
• On Fairness Concerns in the Blockchain Ecosystem [0.0]
  We audit the Bitcoin and blockchains to investigate the norms followed by miners in determining the transaction prioritization. Our findings have significant implications for future developments of blockchains and decentralized applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T08:35:37Z)
• IT Strategic alignment in the decentralized finance (DeFi): CBDC and digital currencies [49.1574468325115]
  Decentralized finance (DeFi) is a disruptive-based financial infrastructure. This paper seeks to answer two main questions 1) What are the common IT elements in the DeFi? And 2) How the elements to the IT strategic alignment in DeFi?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T10:19:20Z)
• Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in Practice [54.47385318258732]
  Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of entities towards a shared vision. In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research. Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how theses actually work in practice and to what extent they are effective in achieving their goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T01:30:03Z)
• SoK: A Stratified Approach to Blockchain Decentralization [6.66161432273916]
  We put forth a systematization of the current landscape with respect to decentralization. Our approach dissects blockchain systems into multiple layers, or strata, each possibly encapsulating multiple categories. We introduce a practical test, the "Minimum Decentralization Test" which can provide quick insights about the decentralization state of a blockchain system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T17:13:09Z)
• Decentralized Local Stochastic Extra-Gradient for Variational Inequalities [125.62877849447729]
  We consider distributed variational inequalities (VIs) on domains with the problem data that is heterogeneous (non-IID) and distributed across many devices. We make a very general assumption on the computational network that covers the settings of fully decentralized calculations. We theoretically analyze its convergence rate in the strongly-monotone, monotone, and non-monotone settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T17:45:51Z)
• Consensus Control for Decentralized Deep Learning [72.50487751271069]
  Decentralized training of deep learning models enables on-device learning over networks, as well as efficient scaling to large compute clusters. We show in theory that when the training consensus distance is lower than a critical quantity, decentralized training converges as fast as the centralized counterpart. Our empirical insights allow the principled design of better decentralized training schemes that mitigate the performance drop.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-09T13:58:33Z)
• Contrasting Centralized and Decentralized Critics in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [19.66161324837036]
  Training for Decentralized Execution, where agents are trained offline using centralized information but execute in a decentralized manner online, has gained popularity in the multi-agent reinforcement learning community. In particular, actor-critic methods with a centralized critic and decentralized actors are a common instance of this idea. We analyze centralized and decentralized critic approaches, providing a deeper understanding of the implications of critic choice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T18:08:11Z)
• Taxonomy of Centralization in Public Blockchain Systems: A Systematic Literature Review [2.1315215140430683]
  Bitcoin introduced delegation of control over a monetary system from a select few to all who participate in that system. This delegation is known as the decentralization of controlling power and is a powerful security mechanism for the ecosystem. Recent studies have observed a trend of increased centralization in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T08:58:48Z)
• Demand-Side Scheduling Based on Multi-Agent Deep Actor-Critic Learning for Smart Grids [56.35173057183362]
  We consider the problem of demand-side energy management, where each household is equipped with a smart meter that is able to schedule home appliances online. The goal is to minimize the overall cost under a real-time pricing scheme. We propose the formulation of a smart grid environment as a Markov game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-05T07:32:40Z)
• Graph Neural Networks for Decentralized Controllers [171.6642679604005]
  Dynamical systems comprised of autonomous agents arise in many relevant problems such as robotics, smart grids, or smart cities. Optimal centralized controllers are readily available but face limitations in terms of scalability and practical implementation. We propose a framework using graph neural networks (GNNs) to learn decentralized controllers from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T13:51:18Z)
• Quantized Decentralized Stochastic Learning over Directed Graphs [54.005946490293496]
  We consider a decentralized learning problem where data points are distributed among computing nodes communicating over a directed graph.<n>As the model size gets large, decentralized learning faces a major bottleneck that is the communication load due to each node transmitting messages (model updates) to its neighbors.<n>We propose the quantized decentralized learning algorithm over directed graphs that is based on the push-sum algorithm in decentralized consensus optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-23T18:25:39Z)
• Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Descent [85.15773446094576]
  We present an in-depth study towards the Byzantine resilience of decentralized learning systems. We propose UBAR, a novel algorithm to enhance decentralized learning with Byzantine Fault Tolerance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T05:11:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.