Taxonomy of Centralization in Public Blockchain Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.12542v1
• Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 08:58:48 GMT
• Title: Taxonomy of Centralization in Public Blockchain Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
• Authors: Ashish Rajendra Sai, Jim Buckley, Brian Fitzgerald and Andrew Le Gear
• Abstract summary: Bitcoin introduced delegation of control over a monetary system from a select few to all who participate in that system. This delegation is known as the decentralization of controlling power and is a powerful security mechanism for the ecosystem. Recent studies have observed a trend of increased centralization in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Governance.
• Score: 2.1315215140430683
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Bitcoin introduced delegation of control over a monetary system from a select few to all who participate in that system. This delegation is known as the decentralization of controlling power and is a powerful security mechanism for the ecosystem. After the introduction of Bitcoin, the field of cryptocurrency has seen widespread attention from industry and academia, so much so that the original novel contribution of Bitcoin i.e. decentralization, may be overlooked, due to decentralizations assumed fundamental existence for the functioning of such cryptoassets. However recent studies have observed a trend of increased centralization in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. As this increased centralization has an impact the security of the blockchain, it is crucial that it is measured, towards adequate control. This research derives an initial taxonomy of centralization present in decentralized blockchains through rigorous synthesis using a systematic literature review. This is followed by iterative refinement through expert interviews. We systematically analyzed 89 research papers published between 2009 and 2019. Our study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by highlighting the multiple definitions and measurements of centralization in the literature. We identify different aspects of centralization and propose an encompassing taxonomy of centralization concerns. This taxonomy is based on empirically observable and measurable characteristics. It consists of 13 aspects of centralization classified over six architectural layers Governance Network Consensus Incentive Operational and Application. We also discuss how the implications of centralization can vary depending on the aspects studied. We believe that this review and taxonomy provides a comprehensive overview of centralization in decentralized blockchains involving various conceptualizations and measures.

Related papers

• Quantifying the Blockchain Trilemma: A Comparative Analysis of Algorand, Ethereum 2.0, and Beyond [4.605490094506685]
  This study evaluates and compares two leading proof-of-stake (PoS) systems, Algorand and 2.0. We analyze each platform's strategies in a structured manner to understand their effectiveness in addressing trilemma challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T14:15:29Z)
• IT Strategic alignment in the decentralized finance (DeFi): CBDC and digital currencies [49.1574468325115]
  Decentralized finance (DeFi) is a disruptive-based financial infrastructure. This paper seeks to answer two main questions 1) What are the common IT elements in the DeFi? And 2) How the elements to the IT strategic alignment in DeFi?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T10:19:20Z)
• Blockchains for Internet of Things: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [38.29453164670072]
  Not every blockchain system is suitable for specific IoT applications. Public blockchains are not suitable for storing sensitive data. We explore the blockchain's application in three pivotal IoT areas: edge AI, communications, and healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T04:25:57Z)
• Decentralization of Ethereum's Builder Market [13.369643484986593]
  The builder market was introduced to fairly distribute Maximal Extractable Values (MEV) among validators. As of the time of writing, three builders produced the vast majority of blocks in, creating a concerning centralization factor. Our main finding is that builder centralization has led to a significant loss by validators and, if left uncontrolled, could lead to validator centralization. We propose a structural change to the existing MEV supply chain and a solution based on the new supply chain structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T14:32:21Z)
• Enhancing Trust and Privacy in Distributed Networks: A Comprehensive Survey on Blockchain-based Federated Learning [51.13534069758711]
  Decentralized approaches like blockchain offer a compelling solution by implementing a consensus mechanism among multiple entities. Federated Learning (FL) enables participants to collaboratively train models while safeguarding data privacy. This paper investigates the synergy between blockchain's security features and FL's privacy-preserving model training capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T07:08:26Z)
• Analyzing Reward Dynamics and Decentralization in Ethereum 2.0: An Advanced Data Engineering Workflow and Comprehensive Datasets for Proof-of-Stake Incentives [5.18461573800406]
  Smart contract blockchain platform, Proof-of-Stake 2.0, guarantees precise execution of applications without third-party intervention. Our study collects consensus reward data from the Beacon chain and conducts a comprehensive analysis of reward distribution and evolution. To evaluate the degree of decentralization in PoS, we apply several inequality indices, including the Shannon entropy, the Gini Index, the Nakamoto Coefficient, and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T02:40:00Z)
• Generative AI-enabled Blockchain Networks: Fundamentals, Applications, and Case Study [73.87110604150315]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has emerged as a promising solution to address challenges of blockchain technology. In this paper, we first introduce GAI techniques, outline their applications, and discuss existing solutions for integrating GAI into blockchains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T10:46:17Z)
• How Does Stake Distribution Influence Consensus? Analyzing Blockchain Decentralization [10.679753825744964]
  This study first formalizes decentralization metrics for weighted consensus mechanisms. We introduce the Square Root Stake Weight (SRSW) model, which effectively recalibrates staking weight distribution. This research is a pivotal step toward a more fair and equitable distribution of staking weight, advancing the decentralization in blockchain consensus mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T15:32:20Z)
• Unpacking How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) Work in Practice [54.47385318258732]
  Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have emerged as a novel way to coordinate a group of entities towards a shared vision. In just a few years, over 4,000 DAOs have been launched in various domains, such as investment, education, health, and research. Despite such rapid growth and diversity, it is unclear how theses actually work in practice and to what extent they are effective in achieving their goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T01:30:03Z)
• SoK: A Stratified Approach to Blockchain Decentralization [6.66161432273916]
  We put forth a systematization of the current landscape with respect to decentralization. Our approach dissects blockchain systems into multiple layers, or strata, each possibly encapsulating multiple categories. We introduce a practical test, the "Minimum Decentralization Test" which can provide quick insights about the decentralization state of a blockchain system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T17:13:09Z)
• Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Stochastic Gradient Descent [85.15773446094576]
  We present an in-depth study towards the Byzantine resilience of decentralized learning systems. We propose UBAR, a novel algorithm to enhance decentralized learning with Byzantine Fault Tolerance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T05:11:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.