A Statistical Theory of Contrastive Learning via Approximate Sufficient Statistics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17538v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 21:07:18 GMT
• Title: A Statistical Theory of Contrastive Learning via Approximate Sufficient Statistics
• Authors: Licong Lin, Song Mei,
• Abstract summary: We develop a new theoretical framework for analyzing data augmentation-based contrastive learning.<n>We show that minimizing SimCLR and other contrastive losses yields encoders that are approximately sufficient.
• Score: 19.24473530318175
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Contrastive learning -- a modern approach to extract useful representations from unlabeled data by training models to distinguish similar samples from dissimilar ones -- has driven significant progress in foundation models. In this work, we develop a new theoretical framework for analyzing data augmentation-based contrastive learning, with a focus on SimCLR as a representative example. Our approach is based on the concept of \emph{approximate sufficient statistics}, which we extend beyond its original definition in \cite{oko2025statistical} for contrastive language-image pretraining (CLIP) using KL-divergence. We generalize it to equivalent forms and general f-divergences, and show that minimizing SimCLR and other contrastive losses yields encoders that are approximately sufficient. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these near-sufficient encoders can be effectively adapted to downstream regression and classification tasks, with performance depending on their sufficiency and the error induced by data augmentation in contrastive learning. Concrete examples in linear regression and topic classification are provided to illustrate the broad applicability of our results.

Related papers

• The Common Stability Mechanism behind most Self-Supervised Learning Approaches [64.40701218561921]
  We provide a framework to explain the stability mechanism of different self-supervised learning techniques. We discuss the working mechanism of contrastive techniques like SimCLR, non-contrastive techniques like BYOL, SWAV, SimSiam, Barlow Twins, and DINO. We formulate different hypotheses and test them using the Imagenet100 dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T20:36:24Z)
• Impact of Dataset Properties on Membership Inference Vulnerability of Deep Transfer Learning [8.808963973962278]
  We analyse the relationship between privacy vulnerability and dataset properties, such as examples per class and number of classes. We derive per-example MIA vulnerability in terms of score distributions and statistics computed from shadow models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T14:23:01Z)
• Towards Better Modeling with Missing Data: A Contrastive Learning-based Visual Analytics Perspective [7.577040836988683]
  Missing data can pose a challenge for machine learning (ML) modeling. Current approaches are categorized into feature imputation and label prediction. This study proposes a Contrastive Learning framework to model observed data with missing values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T13:16:24Z)
• Bias-inducing geometries: an exactly solvable data model with fairness implications [12.532003449620607]
  We introduce an exactly solvable high-dimensional model of data imbalance.<n>We analytically unpack the typical properties of learning models trained in this synthetic framework.<n>We obtain exact predictions for the observables that are commonly employed for fairness assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T16:27:57Z)
• Generalizable Information Theoretic Causal Representation [37.54158138447033]
  We propose to learn causal representation from observational data by regularizing the learning procedure with mutual information measures according to our hypothetical causal graph. The optimization involves a counterfactual loss, based on which we deduce a theoretical guarantee that the causality-inspired learning is with reduced sample complexity and better generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-17T00:38:35Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Fair Representations [50.95604482330149]
  Trained classification models can unintentionally lead to biased representations and predictions. Existing debiasing methods for classification models, such as adversarial training, are often expensive to train and difficult to optimise. We propose a method for mitigating bias by incorporating contrastive learning, in which instances sharing the same class label are encouraged to have similar representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T10:47:51Z)
• Improving the Reconstruction of Disentangled Representation Learners via Multi-Stage Modeling [54.94763543386523]
  Current autoencoder-based disentangled representation learning methods achieve disentanglement by penalizing the ( aggregate) posterior to encourage statistical independence of the latent factors. We present a novel multi-stage modeling approach where the disentangled factors are first learned using a penalty-based disentangled representation learning method. Then, the low-quality reconstruction is improved with another deep generative model that is trained to model the missing correlated latent variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-25T18:51:15Z)
• Adversarial Robustness of Supervised Sparse Coding [34.94566482399662]
  We consider a model that involves learning a representation while at the same time giving a precise generalization bound and a robustness certificate. We focus on the hypothesis class obtained by combining a sparsity-promoting encoder coupled with a linear encoder. We provide a robustness certificate for end-to-end classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T22:05:21Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
• Learning Diverse Representations for Fast Adaptation to Distribution Shift [78.83747601814669]
  We present a method for learning multiple models, incorporating an objective that pressures each to learn a distinct way to solve the task. We demonstrate our framework's ability to facilitate rapid adaptation to distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T12:23:50Z)
• On the Benefits of Invariance in Neural Networks [56.362579457990094]
  We show that training with data augmentation leads to better estimates of risk and thereof gradients, and we provide a PAC-Bayes generalization bound for models trained with data augmentation. We also show that compared to data augmentation, feature averaging reduces generalization error when used with convex losses, and tightens PAC-Bayes bounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T02:08:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.