Bridging Writing Manner Gap in Visual Instruction Tuning by Creating LLM-aligned Instructions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18320v1
• Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 03:59:06 GMT
• Title: Bridging Writing Manner Gap in Visual Instruction Tuning by Creating LLM-aligned Instructions
• Authors: Dong Jing, Nanyi Fei, Zhiwu Lu,
• Abstract summary: We argue that there exists a substantial writing manner gap between the visual instructions and the base Large Language Models (LLMs) within LMMs.<n>We propose leveraging the base LLM to align the writing manner of soft-format visual instructions with that of the base LLM itself, resulting in novel LLM-aligned instructions.
• Score: 20.58878416527427
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the realm of Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs), the instruction quality during the visual instruction tuning stage significantly influences the performance of modality alignment. In this paper, we assess the instruction quality from a unique perspective termed \textbf{Writing Manner}, which encompasses the selection of vocabulary, grammar and sentence structure to convey specific semantics. We argue that there exists a substantial writing manner gap between the visual instructions and the base Large Language Models (LLMs) within LMMs. This gap forces the pre-trained base LLMs to deviate from their original writing styles, leading to capability degradation of both base LLMs and LMMs. To bridge the writing manner gap while preserving the original semantics, we propose directly leveraging the base LLM to align the writing manner of soft-format visual instructions with that of the base LLM itself, resulting in novel LLM-aligned instructions. The manual writing manner evaluation results demonstrate that our approach successfully minimizes the writing manner gap. By utilizing LLM-aligned instructions, the baseline models LLaVA-7B and QwenVL demonstrate enhanced resistance to hallucinations and non-trivial comprehensive improvements across all $15$ visual and language benchmarks.

Related papers

• Self-Correction Makes LLMs Better Parsers [19.20952673157709]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Recent studies suggest that they still face challenges in performing fundamental NLP tasks essential for deep language understanding. We propose a self-correction method that leverages grammar rules from existing treebanks to guide LLMs in correcting previous errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T03:50:59Z)
• Rethinking Semantic Parsing for Large Language Models: Enhancing LLM Performance with Semantic Hints [20.844061807562436]
  We propose SENSE, a novel prompting approach that embeds semantic hints within the prompt. Experiments show that SENSE consistently improves LLMs' performance across various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-22T14:35:09Z)
• CodecLM: Aligning Language Models with Tailored Synthetic Data [51.59223474427153]
  We introduce CodecLM, a framework for adaptively generating high-quality synthetic data for instruction-following abilities. We first encode seed instructions into metadata, which are concise keywords generated on-the-fly to capture the target instruction distribution. We also introduce Self-Rubrics and Contrastive Filtering during decoding to tailor data-efficient samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T21:15:36Z)
• Towards Multimodal In-Context Learning for Vision & Language Models [21.69457980865084]
  State-of-the-art Vision-Language Models (VLMs) ground the vision and the language modality. We propose a simple yet surprisingly effective multi-turn curriculum-based learning methodology with effective data mixes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T13:53:37Z)
• RoCoIns: Enhancing Robustness of Large Language Models through Code-Style Instructions [43.19966425619236]
  We utilize instructions in code style, which are more structural and less ambiguous, to replace typically natural language instructions. Under few-shot scenarios, we propose a novel method to compose in-context demonstrations using both clean and adversarial samples. Experiments on eight robustness datasets show that our method consistently outperforms prompting LLMs with natural language instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T09:30:55Z)
• Contrastive Instruction Tuning [61.97704869248903]
  We propose Contrastive Instruction Tuning to maximize the similarity between semantically equivalent instruction-instance pairs. Experiments on the PromptBench benchmark show that CoIN consistently improves LLMs' robustness to unseen instructions with variations across character, word, sentence, and semantic levels by an average of +2.5% in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T00:09:32Z)
• If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agents [81.60906807941188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a combination of natural language and formal language (code) Code translates high-level goals into executable steps, featuring standard syntax, logical consistency, abstraction, and modularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T16:51:20Z)
• The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning [61.68787689234622]
  A recent study, LIMA, shows that using merely 1K examples for alignment tuning can achieve significant alignment performance as well. This raises questions about how exactly the alignment tuning transforms a base LLM. We show that the gap between tuning-free and tuning-based alignment methods can be significantly reduced through strategic prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T00:46:11Z)
• Auto-Instruct: Automatic Instruction Generation and Ranking for Black-Box Language Models [91.02730155418699]
  Large language models (LLMs) can perform a wide range of tasks by following natural language instructions. We introduce Auto-Instruct, a novel method to automatically improve the quality of instructions provided to LLMs. In experiments on 118 out-of-domain tasks, Auto-Instruct surpasses both human-written instructions and existing baselines of LLM-generated instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T19:52:55Z)
• From Language Modeling to Instruction Following: Understanding the Behavior Shift in LLMs after Instruction Tuning [63.63840740526497]
  We investigate how instruction tuning adjusts pre-trained models with a focus on intrinsic changes. The impact of instruction tuning is then studied by comparing the explanations derived from the pre-trained and instruction-tuned models. Our findings reveal three significant impacts of instruction tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T21:16:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.