Local Interference: Removing Interference Bias in Semi-Parametric Causal Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18756v1
• Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:06:05 GMT
• Title: Local Interference: Removing Interference Bias in Semi-Parametric Causal Models
• Authors: Michael O'Riordan, Ciarán M. Gilligan-Lee,
• Abstract summary: Interference bias is a major impediment to identifying causal effects in real-world settings.<n>We develop a novel definition of causal models with local interference.<n>We prove that the True Average Causal Effect can be identified in certain semi-parametric models.
• Score: 1.1510009152620668
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Interference bias is a major impediment to identifying causal effects in real-world settings. For example, vaccination reduces the transmission of a virus in a population such that everyone benefits -- even those who are not treated. This is a source of bias that must be accounted for if one wants to learn the true effect of a vaccine on an individual's immune system. Previous approaches addressing interference bias require strong domain knowledge in the form of a graphical interaction network fully describing interference between units. Moreover, they place additional constraints on the form the interference can take, such as restricting to linear outcome models, and assuming that interference experienced by a unit does not depend on the unit's covariates. Our work addresses these shortcomings. We first provide and justify a novel definition of causal models with local interference. We prove that the True Average Causal Effect, a measure of causality where interference has been removed, can be identified in certain semi-parametric models satisfying this definition. These models allow for non-linearity, and also for interference to depend on a unit's covariates. An analytic estimand for the True Average Causal Effect is given in such settings. We further prove that the True Average Causal Effect cannot be identified in arbitrary models with local interference, showing that identification requires semi-parametric assumptions. Finally, we provide an empirical validation of our method on both simulated and real-world datasets.

Related papers

• Unsupervised Structural-Counterfactual Generation under Domain Shift [0.0]
  We present a novel generative modeling challenge: generating counterfactual samples in a target domain based on factual observations from a source domain. Our framework combines the posterior distribution of effect-intrinsic variables from the source domain with the prior distribution of domain-intrinsic variables from the target domain to synthesize the desired counterfactuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T16:48:16Z)
• What is causal about causal models and representations? [5.128695263114213]
  Causal Bayesian networks are 'causal' models since they make predictions about interventional distributions.<n>To connect such causal model predictions to real-world outcomes, we must determine which actions in the world correspond to which interventions in the model.<n>We introduce a formal framework to make such requirements for different interpretations of actions as interventions precise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T17:35:21Z)
• Generative Intervention Models for Causal Perturbation Modeling [80.72074987374141]
  In many applications, it is a priori unknown which mechanisms of a system are modified by an external perturbation. We propose a generative intervention model (GIM) that learns to map these perturbation features to distributions over atomic interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T10:37:57Z)
• Estimating Treatment Effects Under Heterogeneous Interference [24.714971680893402]
  We propose a novel approach to model heterogeneous interference by developing a new architecture to aggregate information from diverse neighbors. Our proposed method contains graph neural networks that aggregate same-view information, a mechanism that aggregates information from different views, and attention mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T05:44:17Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Causal Discovery via Conditional Independence Testing with Proxy Variables [35.3493980628004]
  The presence of unobserved variables, such as the latent confounder, can introduce bias in conditional independence testing. We propose a novel hypothesis-testing procedure that can effectively examine the existence of the causal relationship over continuous variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T09:08:39Z)
• Neighborhood Adaptive Estimators for Causal Inference under Network Interference [109.17155002599978]
  We consider the violation of the classical no-interference assumption with units connected by a network.<n>For tractability, we consider a known network that describes how interference may spread.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-07T14:53:47Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders. We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z)
• Causal Expectation-Maximisation [70.45873402967297]
  We show that causal inference is NP-hard even in models characterised by polytree-shaped graphs. We introduce the causal EM algorithm to reconstruct the uncertainty about the latent variables from data about categorical manifest variables. We argue that there appears to be an unnoticed limitation to the trending idea that counterfactual bounds can often be computed without knowledge of the structural equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T10:25:13Z)
• Information-Theoretic Approximation to Causal Models [0.0]
  We show that it is possible to solve the problem of inferring the causal direction and causal effect between two random variables from a finite sample. We embed distributions that originate from samples of X and Y into a higher dimensional probability space. We show that this information-theoretic approximation to causal models (IACM) can be done by solving a linear optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T18:34:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.