1.4 Million Open-Source Distilled Reasoning Dataset to Empower Large Language Model Training

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.19633v1
• Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:19:46 GMT
• Title: 1.4 Million Open-Source Distilled Reasoning Dataset to Empower Large Language Model Training
• Authors: Han Zhao, Haotian Wang, Yiping Peng, Sitong Zhao, Xiaoyu Tian, Shuaiting Chen, Yunjie Ji, Xiangang Li,
• Abstract summary: The AM-DeepSeek-R1-Distilled is a large-scale dataset with thinking traces for general reasoning tasks.<n>The AM-Distill-Qwen-32B model, which was trained through only simple Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), outperformed the DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B model on four benchmarks.
• Score: 16.441081996257576
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The AM-DeepSeek-R1-Distilled is a large-scale dataset with thinking traces for general reasoning tasks, composed of high-quality and challenging reasoning problems. These problems are collected from a multitude of open-source datasets, subjected to semantic deduplication and meticulous cleaning to eliminate test set contamination. All responses within the dataset are distilled from reasoning models (predominantly DeepSeek-R1) and have undergone rigorous verification procedures. Mathematical problems are validated by checking against reference answers, code problems are verified using test cases, and other tasks are evaluated with the aid of a reward model. The AM-Distill-Qwen-32B model, which was trained through only simple Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) using this batch of data, outperformed the DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B model on four benchmarks: AIME2024, MATH-500, GPQA-Diamond, and LiveCodeBench. Additionally, the AM-Distill-Qwen-72B model surpassed the DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B model on all benchmarks as well. We are releasing these 1.4 million problems and their corresponding responses to the research community with the objective of fostering the development of powerful reasoning-oriented Large Language Models (LLMs). The dataset was published in \href{https://huggingface.co/datasets/a-m-team/AM-DeepSeek-R1-Distilled-1.4M}{https://huggingface.co/datasets/a-m-team/AM-DeepSeek-R1-Distilled-1.4M}.

Related papers

• Phi-4-Mini-Reasoning: Exploring the Limits of Small Reasoning Language Models in Math [135.1260782461186]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) significantly enhances formal reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) However, improving reasoning in Small Language Models (SLMs) remains challenging due to their limited model capacity. We present a systematic training recipe for SLMs that consists of four steps: (1) large-scale mid-training on diverse distilled long-CoT data, (2) supervised fine-tuning on high-quality long-CoT data, (3) Rollout DPO leveraging a carefully curated preference dataset, and (4) Reinforcement Learning (RL) with Verifiable Reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T00:04:35Z)
• SEAL: Steerable Reasoning Calibration of Large Language Models for Free [58.190800043449336]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated compelling capabilities for complex reasoning tasks via the extended chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning mechanism. Recent studies reveal substantial redundancy in the CoT reasoning traces, which negatively impacts model performance. We introduce SEAL, a training-free approach that seamlessly calibrates the CoT process, improving accuracy while demonstrating significant efficiency gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T02:42:07Z)
• Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Models [24.45348222168512]
  We propose the reasoning MLLM, Vision-R1, to improve multimodal reasoning capability.<n>Our model achieves an average improvement of $sim$6% across various multimodal math reasoning benchmarks.<n>Vision-R1-7B achieves a 73.5% accuracy on the widely used MathVista benchmark, which is only 0.4% lower than the leading reasoning model, OpenAI O1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T20:06:45Z)
• TinyR1-32B-Preview: Boosting Accuracy with Branch-Merge Distillation [19.938309176933902]
  We introduce the Branch-Merge distillation approach, which enhances model compression through two phases. We validate our distillation approach using DeepSeek-R1 as the teacher and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B as the student. The resulting merged model, TinyR1-32B-Preview, outperforms its counterpart DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B across multiple benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T16:25:53Z)
• DocPuzzle: A Process-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Realistic Long-Context Reasoning Capabilities [39.68147391225923]
  We present DocPuzzle, a rigorously constructed benchmark for evaluating long-context reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs)<n>This benchmark comprises 100 expert-level QA problems requiring multi-step reasoning over long real-world documents.<n>We introduce an innovative evaluation framework that mitigates guessing bias through checklist-guided process analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T03:29:53Z)
• Token-Hungry, Yet Precise: DeepSeek R1 Highlights the Need for Multi-Step Reasoning Over Speed in MATH [0.0]
  This study investigates the performance of the DeepSeek R1 language model on 30 challenging mathematical problems.<n>DeepSeek R1 achieves superior accuracy on these complex problems but generates significantly more tokens than other models.<n>The findings highlight a trade-off between accuracy and efficiency in mathematical problem-solving with large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T18:45:51Z)
• DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [147.16121855209246]
  We introduce our first-generation reasoning models, DeepSeek-R1-Zero and DeepSeek-R1.<n>DeepSeek-R1-Zero is trained via large-scale reinforcement learning.<n>DeepSeek-R1 incorporates multi-stage training and cold-start data before RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-22T15:19:35Z)
• MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale [66.73529246309033]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown significant potential in a broad range of multimodal tasks.<n>Existing instruction-tuning datasets only provide phrase-level answers without any intermediate rationales.<n>We introduce a scalable and cost-effective method to construct a large-scale multimodal instruction-tuning dataset with rich intermediate rationales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T18:14:24Z)
• TextSquare: Scaling up Text-Centric Visual Instruction Tuning [64.55339431760727]
  We introduce a new approach for creating a massive, high-quality instruction-tuning dataset, Square-10M. Our model, TextSquare, considerably surpasses open-source previous state-of-the-art Text-centric MLLMs. It even outperforms top-tier models like GPT4V and Gemini in 6 of 10 text-centric benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T11:38:08Z)
• How Easy is It to Fool Your Multimodal LLMs? An Empirical Analysis on Deceptive Prompts [54.07541591018305]
  We present MAD-Bench, a benchmark that contains 1000 test samples divided into 5 categories, such as non-existent objects, count of objects, and spatial relationship. We provide a comprehensive analysis of popular MLLMs, ranging from GPT-4v, Reka, Gemini-Pro, to open-sourced models, such as LLaVA-NeXT and MiniCPM-Llama3. While GPT-4o achieves 82.82% accuracy on MAD-Bench, the accuracy of any other model in our experiments ranges from 9% to 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:31:27Z)
• Exploring Multimodal Large Language Models for Radiology Report Error-checking [1.7217842380976978]
  This paper proposes one of the first clinical applications of multimodal large language models (LLMs) as an assistant for radiologists to check errors in their reports. We created an evaluation dataset from real-world radiology datasets (including X-rays and CT scans) At the SIMPLE level, our fine-tuned model significantly enhanced performance by 47.4% and 25.4% on MIMIC-CXR and IU X-ray data, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T15:20:33Z)
• TACRED Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the TACRED Relation Extraction Task [80.38130122127882]
  TACRED is one of the largest, most widely used crowdsourced datasets in Relation Extraction (RE) In this paper, we investigate the questions: Have we reached a performance ceiling or is there still room for improvement? We find that label errors account for 8% absolute F1 test error, and that more than 50% of the examples need to be relabeled.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T15:07:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.