Look Before Leap: Look-Ahead Planning with Uncertainty in Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.20139v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 01:07:35 GMT
• Title: Look Before Leap: Look-Ahead Planning with Uncertainty in Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Yongshuai Liu, Xin Liu,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel framework for uncertainty-aware policy optimization with model-based exploratory planning.<n>In the policy optimization phase, we leverage an uncertainty-driven exploratory policy to actively collect diverse training samples.<n>Our approach offers flexibility and applicability to tasks with varying state/action spaces and reward structures.
• Score: 4.902161835372679
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) has demonstrated superior sample efficiency compared to model-free reinforcement learning (MFRL). However, the presence of inaccurate models can introduce biases during policy learning, resulting in misleading trajectories. The challenge lies in obtaining accurate models due to limited diverse training data, particularly in regions with limited visits (uncertain regions). Existing approaches passively quantify uncertainty after sample generation, failing to actively collect uncertain samples that could enhance state coverage and improve model accuracy. Moreover, MBRL often faces difficulties in making accurate multi-step predictions, thereby impacting overall performance. To address these limitations, we propose a novel framework for uncertainty-aware policy optimization with model-based exploratory planning. In the model-based planning phase, we introduce an uncertainty-aware k-step lookahead planning approach to guide action selection at each step. This process involves a trade-off analysis between model uncertainty and value function approximation error, effectively enhancing policy performance. In the policy optimization phase, we leverage an uncertainty-driven exploratory policy to actively collect diverse training samples, resulting in improved model accuracy and overall performance of the RL agent. Our approach offers flexibility and applicability to tasks with varying state/action spaces and reward structures. We validate its effectiveness through experiments on challenging robotic manipulation tasks and Atari games, surpassing state-of-the-art methods with fewer interactions, thereby leading to significant performance improvements.

Related papers

• STAR: Constraint LoRA with Dynamic Active Learning for Data-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models [21.929902181609936]
  We propose a novel approach to integrate uncertainty-based active learning and LoRA. For the uncertainty gap, we introduce a dynamic uncertainty measurement that combines the uncertainty of the base model and the uncertainty of the full model. For poor model calibration, we incorporate the regularization method during LoRA training to keep the model from being over-confident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-02T10:38:10Z)
• When Demonstrations Meet Generative World Models: A Maximum Likelihood Framework for Offline Inverse Reinforcement Learning [62.00672284480755]
  This paper aims to recover the structure of rewards and environment dynamics that underlie observed actions in a fixed, finite set of demonstrations from an expert agent. Accurate models of expertise in executing a task has applications in safety-sensitive applications such as clinical decision making and autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T04:14:20Z)
• Plan To Predict: Learning an Uncertainty-Foreseeing Model for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [32.24146877835396]
  We propose emphPlan To Predict (P2P), a framework that treats the model rollout process as a sequential decision making problem. We show that P2P achieves state-of-the-art performance on several challenging benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-20T10:17:22Z)
• Post-hoc Uncertainty Learning using a Dirichlet Meta-Model [28.522673618527417]
  We propose a novel Bayesian meta-model to augment pre-trained models with better uncertainty quantification abilities. Our proposed method requires no additional training data and is flexible enough to quantify different uncertainties. We demonstrate our proposed meta-model approach's flexibility and superior empirical performance on these applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T17:34:11Z)
• When to Update Your Model: Constrained Model-based Reinforcement Learning [50.74369835934703]
  We propose a novel and general theoretical scheme for a non-decreasing performance guarantee of model-based RL (MBRL) Our follow-up derived bounds reveal the relationship between model shifts and performance improvement. A further example demonstrates that learning models from a dynamically-varying number of explorations benefit the eventual returns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T17:57:43Z)
• Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexity [51.476337785345436]
  We study a pessimistic variant of Q-learning in the context of finite-horizon Markov decision processes. A variance-reduced pessimistic Q-learning algorithm is proposed to achieve near-optimal sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T15:39:36Z)
• Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Conservative Model-Based Actor-Critic [67.00475077281212]
  Model-based reinforcement learning algorithms are more sample efficient than their model-free counterparts. We propose a novel approach that achieves high sample efficiency without the strong reliance on accurate learned models. We show that CMBAC significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in terms of sample efficiency on several challenging tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T15:33:11Z)
• Revisiting Design Choices in Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning [39.01805509055988]
  Offline reinforcement learning enables agents to leverage large pre-collected datasets of environment transitions to learn control policies. This paper compares and designs novel protocols to investigate their interaction with other hyper parameters, such as the number of models, or imaginary rollout horizon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T13:51:34Z)
• Evaluating model-based planning and planner amortization for continuous control [79.49319308600228]
  We take a hybrid approach, combining model predictive control (MPC) with a learned model and model-free policy learning. We find that well-tuned model-free agents are strong baselines even for high DoF control problems. We show that it is possible to distil a model-based planner into a policy that amortizes the planning without any loss of performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T12:00:40Z)
• Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Model-Ensemble Exploration and Exploitation [3.728946517493471]
  MEEE is a model-ensemble method that consists of optimistic exploration and weighted exploitation. Our approach outperforms other model-free and model-based state-of-the-art methods, especially in sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T07:18:20Z)
• COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization [120.55713363569845]
  Uncertainty estimation with complex models, such as deep neural networks, can be difficult and unreliable. We develop a new model-based offline RL algorithm, COMBO, that regularizes the value function on out-of-support state-actions. We find that COMBO consistently performs as well or better as compared to prior offline model-free and model-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T18:50:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.