Comparing Methods for Bias Mitigation in Graph Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22569v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:18:48 GMT
• Title: Comparing Methods for Bias Mitigation in Graph Neural Networks
• Authors: Barbara Hoffmann, Ruben Mayer,
• Abstract summary: This paper examines the critical role of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in data preparation for generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems.<n>We present a comparative analysis of three distinct methods for bias mitigation: data sparsification, feature modification, and synthetic data augmentation.
• Score: 5.256237513030105
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper examines the critical role of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in data preparation for generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) systems, with a particular focus on addressing and mitigating biases. We present a comparative analysis of three distinct methods for bias mitigation: data sparsification, feature modification, and synthetic data augmentation. Through experimental analysis using the german credit dataset, we evaluate these approaches using multiple fairness metrics, including statistical parity, equality of opportunity, and false positive rates. Our research demonstrates that while all methods improve fairness metrics compared to the original dataset, stratified sampling and synthetic data augmentation using GraphSAGE prove particularly effective in balancing demographic representation while maintaining model performance. The results provide practical insights for developing more equitable AI systems while maintaining model performance.

Related papers

• Prototype-Guided Diffusion for Digital Pathology: Achieving Foundation Model Performance with Minimal Clinical Data [6.318463500874778]
  We propose a prototype-guided diffusion model to generate high-fidelity synthetic pathology data at scale. Our approach ensures biologically and diagnostically meaningful variations in the generated data. We demonstrate that self-supervised features trained on our synthetic dataset achieve competitive performance despite using 60x-760x less data than models trained on large real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T21:17:39Z)
• Graph Neural Network-Driven Hierarchical Mining for Complex Imbalanced Data [0.8246494848934447]
  This study presents a hierarchical mining framework for high-dimensional imbalanced data.<n>By constructing a structured graph representation of the dataset and integrating graph neural network embeddings, the proposed method effectively captures global interdependencies among samples.<n> Empirical evaluations across multiple experimental scenarios validate the efficacy of the proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T06:26:41Z)
• Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models [89.88010750772413]
  Synthetic data has been proposed as a solution to address the issue of high-quality data scarcity in the training of large language models (LLMs) Our work delves into these specific flaws associated with question-answer (Q-A) pairs, a prevalent type of synthetic data, and presents a method based on unlearning techniques to mitigate these flaws. Our work has yielded key insights into the effective use of synthetic data, aiming to promote more robust and efficient LLM training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T08:38:59Z)
• A Comparative Study on Enhancing Prediction in Social Network Advertisement through Data Augmentation [0.6707149143800017]
  This study presents and explores a generative augmentation framework of social network advertising data. Our framework explores three generative models for data augmentation - Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), and Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T01:16:11Z)
• The Common Stability Mechanism behind most Self-Supervised Learning Approaches [64.40701218561921]
  We provide a framework to explain the stability mechanism of different self-supervised learning techniques. We discuss the working mechanism of contrastive techniques like SimCLR, non-contrastive techniques like BYOL, SWAV, SimSiam, Barlow Twins, and DINO. We formulate different hypotheses and test them using the Imagenet100 dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T20:36:24Z)
• TRIAGE: Characterizing and auditing training data for improved regression [80.11415390605215]
  We introduce TRIAGE, a novel data characterization framework tailored to regression tasks and compatible with a broad class of regressors. TRIAGE utilizes conformal predictive distributions to provide a model-agnostic scoring method, the TRIAGE score. We show that TRIAGE's characterization is consistent and highlight its utility to improve performance via data sculpting/filtering, in multiple regression settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T10:31:59Z)
• Data-heterogeneity-aware Mixing for Decentralized Learning [63.83913592085953]
  We characterize the dependence of convergence on the relationship between the mixing weights of the graph and the data heterogeneity across nodes. We propose a metric that quantifies the ability of a graph to mix the current gradients. Motivated by our analysis, we propose an approach that periodically and efficiently optimize the metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T15:54:35Z)
• CAFE: Learning to Condense Dataset by Aligning Features [72.99394941348757]
  We propose a novel scheme to Condense dataset by Aligning FEatures (CAFE) At the heart of our approach is an effective strategy to align features from the real and synthetic data across various scales. We validate the proposed CAFE across various datasets, and demonstrate that it generally outperforms the state of the art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T05:58:49Z)
• Fair Node Representation Learning via Adaptive Data Augmentation [9.492903649862761]
  This work theoretically explains the sources of bias in node representations obtained via Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) Building upon the analysis, fairness-aware data augmentation frameworks are developed to reduce the intrinsic bias. Our analysis and proposed schemes can be readily employed to enhance the fairness of various GNN-based learning mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T05:49:15Z)
• Transitioning from Real to Synthetic data: Quantifying the bias in model [1.6134566438137665]
  This study aims to establish a trade-off between bias and fairness in the models trained using synthetic data. We demonstrate there exist a varying levels of bias impact on models trained using synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T06:57:14Z)
• Negative Data Augmentation [127.28042046152954]
  We show that negative data augmentation samples provide information on the support of the data distribution. We introduce a new GAN training objective where we use NDA as an additional source of synthetic data for the discriminator. Empirically, models trained with our method achieve improved conditional/unconditional image generation along with improved anomaly detection capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-09T20:28:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.