An Organizationally-Oriented Approach to Enhancing Explainability and Control in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23615v1
• Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 22:43:01 GMT
• Title: An Organizationally-Oriented Approach to Enhancing Explainability and Control in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
• Abstract summary: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning can lead to the development of collaborative agent behaviors that show similarities with organizational concepts.<n>We introduce a novel framework that explicitly incorporates organizational roles and goals from the $mathcalMOISE+$ model into the MARL process.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning can lead to the development of collaborative agent behaviors that show similarities with organizational concepts. Pushing forward this perspective, we introduce a novel framework that explicitly incorporates organizational roles and goals from the $\mathcal{M}OISE^+$ model into the MARL process, guiding agents to satisfy corresponding organizational constraints. By structuring training with roles and goals, we aim to enhance both the explainability and control of agent behaviors at the organizational level, whereas much of the literature primarily focuses on individual agents. Additionally, our framework includes a post-training analysis method to infer implicit roles and goals, offering insights into emergent agent behaviors. This framework has been applied across various MARL environments and algorithms, demonstrating coherence between predefined organizational specifications and those inferred from trained agents.

Related papers

• Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems [65.90791804095561]
  Multi-agent systems address this through structured collaboration among specialized agents, but tighter coordination amplifies a less explored risk.<n>Existing surveys cover individual agent capabilities, multi-agent collaboration, or agent self-evolution separately, leaving the causal dependencies among them unexamined.<n>This survey provides a unified review organized around four causally linked stages, which we term the LIFE progression: Lay the capability foundation, Integrate agents through collaboration, Find faults through attribution, and Evolve through autonomous self-improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T14:36:13Z)
• Toward Formalizing LLM-Based Agent Designs through Structural Context Modeling and Semantic Dynamics Analysis [13.919694566467053]
  We argue that this fragmentation stems from the absence of an analyzable, self-consistent formal model that enables characterization and comparison of LLM agents.<n>To address this gap, we propose the texttt Structural Context Model, a formal model for analyzing and comparing LLM agents from the perspective of context structure.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of the complete framework on dynamic variants of the monkey-banana problem, where agents engineered using our approach achieve up to a 32 percentage points improvement in success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T05:15:11Z)
• Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z)
• Adaptation of Agentic AI [162.63072848575695]
  We unify the rapidly expanding research landscape into a systematic framework that spans both agent adaptations and tool adaptations.<n>We demonstrate that this framework helps clarify the design space of adaptation strategies in agentic AI.<n>We then review the representative approaches in each category, analyze their strengths and limitations, and highlight key open challenges and future opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T08:38:51Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Multi-Turn LLM Agents via Behavioral Guidance [0.0]
  Large Language Models demonstrate strong reasoning and generation abilities, yet their behavior in multi-turn tasks often lacks reliability and verifiability.<n>We present a task completion framework that enables LLM-based agents to act under explicit behavioral guidance in environments described by reinforcement learning formalisms with defined observation, action, and reward signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T10:03:24Z)
• An Empirical Study of Agent Developer Practices in AI Agent Frameworks [59.862193600499914]
  The rise of large language models (LLMs) has sparked a surge of interest in agents, leading to the rapid growth of agent frameworks.<n>Despite widespread use of agent frameworks, their practical applications and how they influence the agent development process remain underexplored.<n>More than 80% of developers report difficulties in identifying the frameworks that best meet their specific development requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T17:52:15Z)
• The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey [103.32591749156416]
  The emergence of agentic reinforcement learning (Agentic RL) marks a paradigm shift from conventional reinforcement learning applied to large language models (LLM RL)<n>This survey formalizes this conceptual shift by contrasting the degenerate single-step Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) of LLM-RL with the temporally extended, partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) that define Agentic RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-02T17:46:26Z)
• Multi-Agent Collaboration via Evolving Orchestration [61.93162413517026]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable results across diverse downstream tasks, but their monolithic nature restricts scalability and efficiency in complex problem-solving.<n>We propose a puppeteer-style paradigm for LLM-based multi-agent collaboration, where a central orchestrator dynamically directs agents in response to evolving task states.<n> Experiments on closed- and open-domain scenarios show that this method achieves superior performance with reduced computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T07:02:17Z)
• The Influence of Human-inspired Agentic Sophistication in LLM-driven Strategic Reasoners [3.5083201638203154]
  We evaluate the role of agentic sophistication in shaping artificial reasoners' performance.<n>We benchmarked three agent designs: a simple game-theoretic model, an unstructured LLM-as-agent model, and an LLM integrated into a traditional agentic framework.<n>Our analysis, covering over 2000 reasoning samples across 25 agent configurations, shows that human-inspired cognitive structures can enhance LLM agents' alignment with human strategic behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-14T13:51:24Z)
• Emergence of Roles in Robotic Teams with Model Sharing and Limited Communication [0.0]
  We present a reinforcement learning strategy for use in multi-agent foraging systems in which the learning is centralised to a single agent. This approach aims to significantly reduce the computational and energy demands compared to approaches such as MARL and centralised learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T14:05:46Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making. With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems. We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges [88.3032929492409]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents, with goal-driven behaviors and dynamic adaptation capabilities, potentially represent a critical pathway toward artificial general intelligence.<n>This survey systematically deconstructs LLM agent systems through a methodology-centered taxonomy.<n>Our work provides a unified architectural perspective, examining how agents are constructed, how they collaborate, and how they evolve over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T12:50:17Z)
• ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [54.787341008881036]
  We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA), a novel framework that leverages Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors.<n>ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z)
• Contextual Knowledge Sharing in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Decentralized Communication and Coordination [0.9776703963093367]
  Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (Dec-MARL) has emerged as a pivotal approach for addressing complex tasks in dynamic environments.<n>This paper presents a novel Dec-MARL framework that integrates peer-to-peer communication and coordination, incorporating goal-awareness and time-awareness into the agents' knowledge-sharing processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-26T22:49:50Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process.<n>We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• Gödel Agent: A Self-Referential Agent Framework for Recursive Self-Improvement [117.94654815220404]
  G"odel Agent is a self-evolving framework inspired by the G"odel machine. G"odel Agent can achieve continuous self-improvement, surpassing manually crafted agents in performance, efficiency, and generalizability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T10:49:40Z)
• LLM-Agent-UMF: LLM-based Agent Unified Modeling Framework for Seamless Integration of Multi Active/Passive Core-Agents [0.0]
  We propose a novel LLM-based Agent Unified Modeling Framework (LLM-Agent-UMF) Our framework distinguishes between the different components of an LLM-based agent, setting LLMs and tools apart from a new element, the core-agent. We evaluate our framework by applying it to thirteen state-of-the-art agents, thereby demonstrating its alignment with their functionalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T17:54:17Z)
• Optimizing Collaboration of LLM based Agents for Finite Element Analysis [1.5039745292757671]
  This paper investigates the interactions between multiple agents within Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of programming and coding tasks. We utilize the AutoGen framework to facilitate communication among agents, evaluating different configurations based on the success rates from 40 random runs for each setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T23:11:08Z)
• AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents [74.16170899755281]
  We introduce AgentBoard, a pioneering comprehensive benchmark and accompanied open-source evaluation framework tailored to analytical evaluation of LLM agents.<n>AgentBoard offers a fine-grained progress rate metric that captures incremental advancements as well as a comprehensive evaluation toolkit.<n>This not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also propels the interpretability of their performance to the forefront.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T01:51:00Z)
• Beyond Rewards: a Hierarchical Perspective on Offline Multiagent Behavioral Analysis [14.656957226255628]
  We introduce a model-agnostic method for discovery of behavior clusters in multiagent domains. Our framework makes no assumption about agents' underlying learning algorithms, does not require access to their latent states or models, and can be trained using entirely offline observational data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T23:07:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.