AnesSuite: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Dataset Suite for Anesthesiology Reasoning in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02404v2
• Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 04:08:42 GMT
• Title: AnesSuite: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Dataset Suite for Anesthesiology Reasoning in LLMs
• Authors: Xiang Feng, Wentao Jiang, Zengmao Wang, Yong Luo, Pingbo Xu, Baosheng Yu, Hua Jin, Bo Du, Jing Zhang,
• Abstract summary: AnesSuite is the first dataset suite specifically designed for anesthesiology reasoning in LLMs.<n>Morpheus is the first baseline model collection for anesthesiology reasoning.
• Score: 62.60333833486799
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The application of large language models (LLMs) in the medical field has garnered significant attention, yet their reasoning capabilities in more specialized domains like anesthesiology remain underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce AnesSuite, the first comprehensive dataset suite specifically designed for anesthesiology reasoning in LLMs. The suite features AnesBench, an evaluation benchmark tailored to assess anesthesiology-related reasoning across three levels: factual retrieval (System 1), hybrid reasoning (System 1.x), and complex decision-making (System 2). Alongside this benchmark, the suite includes three training datasets that provide an infrastructure for continued pre-training (CPT), supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). Leveraging this suite, we develop Morpheus, the first baseline model collection for anesthesiology reasoning. Despite undergoing limited training with SFT and group relative policy optimization (GRPO), Morpheus demonstrates substantial performance improvements, rivaling the performance of larger-scale models. Furthermore, through comprehensive evaluations and experiments, we analyze the key factors influencing anesthesiology reasoning performance, including model characteristics, training strategies and training data. Both AnesSuite and Morpheus will be open-sourced at https://github.com/MiliLab/AnesSuite.

Related papers

• The Geometry of Transfer: Unlocking Medical Vision Manifolds for Training-Free Model Ranking [31.961181244685932]
  We propose a novel Topology-Driven Transferability Estimation framework that evaluates manifold tractability rather than statistical overlap.<n>Our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by around textbf31% relative improvement in the weighted Kendall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T11:04:15Z)
• Towards Better Ultrasound Video Segmentation Foundation Model: An Empirical study on SAM2 Finetuning from Data Perspective [0.7629717457706325]
  We present a data-centric investigation of SAM2 adaptation for ultrasound video segmentation.<n>We analyze how training-set size, video duration, and augmentation schemes affect adaptation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T21:45:18Z)
• MedSeqFT: Sequential Fine-tuning Foundation Models for 3D Medical Image Segmentation [55.37355146924576]
  MedSeqFT is a sequential fine-tuning framework for medical image analysis.<n>It adapts pre-trained models to new tasks while refining their representational capacity.<n>It consistently outperforms state-of-the-art fine-tuning strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-07T15:22:53Z)
• Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z)
• Enhancing Study-Level Inference from Clinical Trial Papers via RL-based Numeric Reasoning [10.449112615828419]
  We conceptualise the problem as one of quantitative reasoning.<n>We develop a numeric reasoning system composed of a numeric data extraction model and an effect estimate component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T22:59:45Z)
• AGIR: Assessing 3D Gait Impairment with Reasoning based on LLMs [0.0]
  gait impairment plays an important role in early diagnosis, disease monitoring, and treatment evaluation for neurodegenerative diseases.<n>Recent deep learning-based approaches have consistently improved classification accuracies, but they often lack interpretability.<n>We introduce AGIR, a novel pipeline consisting of a pre-trained VQ-VAE motion tokenizer and a Large Language Model (LLM) fine-tuned over pairs of motion tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T17:12:16Z)
• MedAgentsBench: Benchmarking Thinking Models and Agent Frameworks for Complex Medical Reasoning [34.93995619867384]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on existing medical question-answering benchmarks.<n>We present MedAgentsBench, a benchmark that focuses on challenging medical questions requiring multi-step clinical reasoning, diagnosis formulation, and treatment planning-scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T15:38:44Z)
• Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases [48.87360916431396]
  We introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references.<n>We propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey.<n>Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T18:35:39Z)
• Federated Fine-Tuning of LLMs: Framework Comparison and Research Directions [59.5243730853157]
  Federated learning (FL) provides a privacy-preserving solution for fine-tuning pre-trained large language models (LLMs) using distributed private datasets.<n>This article conducts a comparative analysis of three advanced federated LLM (FedLLM) frameworks that integrate knowledge distillation (KD) and split learning (SL) to mitigate these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-08T11:37:06Z)
• SELF: Surrogate-light Feature Selection with Large Language Models in Deep Recommender Systems [51.09233156090496]
  SurrogatE-Light Feature selection method for deep recommender systems.<n> SELF integrates semantic reasoning from Large Language Models with task-specific learning from surrogate models.<n> Comprehensive experiments on three public datasets from real-world recommender platforms validate the effectiveness of SELF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T16:28:18Z)
• X2-DFD: A framework for eXplainable and eXtendable Deepfake Detection [55.77552681618732]
  X2-DFD is an eXplainable and eXtendable framework based on multimodal large-language models (MLLMs) for deepfake detection.<n>The first stage, Model Feature Assessment, systematically evaluates the detectability of forgery-related features for the MLLM.<n>The second stage, Explainable dataset Construction, consists of two key modules: Strong Feature Strengthening and Weak Feature Supplementing.<n>The third stage, Fine-tuning and Inference, involves fine-tuning the MLLM on the constructed dataset and deploying it for final detection and explanation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T15:28:33Z)
• Rethinking Pre-Trained Feature Extractor Selection in Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Classification [2.375943263571389]
  Multiple instance learning (MIL) has become a preferred method for gigapixel whole slide image (WSI) classification without requiring patch-level annotations.<n>This study systematically evaluating MIL feature extractors across three dimensions: pre-training dataset, backbone model, and pre-training method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T10:34:23Z)
• SemioLLM: Assessing Large Language Models for Semiological Analysis in Epilepsy Research [45.2233252981348]
  Large Language Models have shown promising results in their ability to encode general medical knowledge. We test the ability of state-of-the-art LLMs to leverage their internal knowledge and reasoning for epilepsy diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T11:02:12Z)
• Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Foundational Models for Q&A Classification in Mental Health care [0.18416014644193068]
  Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) have the potential to transform mental health support. This study evaluates the effectiveness of PLMs for classification of Questions and Answers in the domain of mental health care.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T00:11:07Z)
• MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.<n>We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.<n>Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z)
• GenBench: A Benchmarking Suite for Systematic Evaluation of Genomic Foundation Models [56.63218531256961]
  We introduce GenBench, a benchmarking suite specifically tailored for evaluating the efficacy of Genomic Foundation Models. GenBench offers a modular and expandable framework that encapsulates a variety of state-of-the-art methodologies. We provide a nuanced analysis of the interplay between model architecture and dataset characteristics on task-specific performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T08:01:05Z)
• XAI4LLM. Let Machine Learning Models and LLMs Collaborate for Enhanced In-Context Learning in Healthcare [16.79952669254101]
  We introduce a knowledge-guided in-context learning framework to enable large language models to process structured clinical data.<n>Our approach integrates domain-specific feature groupings, carefully balanced few-shot examples, and task-specific prompting strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T06:52:44Z)
• Evaluation of General Large Language Models in Contextually Assessing Semantic Concepts Extracted from Adult Critical Care Electronic Health Record Notes [17.648021186810663]
  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in understanding and processing real-world clinical notes. The GPT family models have demonstrated considerable efficiency, evidenced by their cost-effectiveness and time-saving capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T16:52:37Z)
• Physics Inspired Hybrid Attention for SAR Target Recognition [61.01086031364307]
  We propose a physics inspired hybrid attention (PIHA) mechanism and the once-for-all (OFA) evaluation protocol to address the issues. PIHA leverages the high-level semantics of physical information to activate and guide the feature group aware of local semantics of target. Our method outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches in 12 test scenarios with same ASC parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:39:41Z)
• MS Lesion Segmentation: Revisiting Weighting Mechanisms for Federated Learning [92.91544082745196]
  Federated learning (FL) has been widely employed for medical image analysis. FL's performance is limited for multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion segmentation tasks. We propose the first FL MS lesion segmentation framework via two effective re-weighting mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T14:06:03Z)
• Estimating and Improving Fairness with Adversarial Learning [65.99330614802388]
  We propose an adversarial multi-task training strategy to simultaneously mitigate and detect bias in the deep learning-based medical image analysis system. Specifically, we propose to add a discrimination module against bias and a critical module that predicts unfairness within the base classification model. We evaluate our framework on a large-scale public-available skin lesion dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-07T03:10:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.