How Artificial Intelligence Leads to Knowledge Why: An Inquiry Inspired by Aristotle's Posterior Analytics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02430v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 09:37:05 GMT
• Title: How Artificial Intelligence Leads to Knowledge Why: An Inquiry Inspired by Aristotle's Posterior Analytics
• Authors: Guus Eelink, Kilian Rückschloß, Felix Weitkämper,
• Abstract summary: This work introduces the theoretical framework of causal systems to clarify Aristotle's distinction between knowledge that and knowledge why within artificial intelligence.<n>It argues that predicting the effects of external interventions is feasible only with knowledge why, providing a more precise understanding of the knowledge necessary for such tasks.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Bayesian networks and causal models provide frameworks for handling queries about external interventions and counterfactuals, enabling tasks that go beyond what probability distributions alone can address. While these formalisms are often informally described as capturing causal knowledge, there is a lack of a formal theory characterizing the type of knowledge required to predict the effects of external interventions. This work introduces the theoretical framework of causal systems to clarify Aristotle's distinction between knowledge that and knowledge why within artificial intelligence. By interpreting existing artificial intelligence technologies as causal systems, it investigates the corresponding types of knowledge. Furthermore, it argues that predicting the effects of external interventions is feasible only with knowledge why, providing a more precise understanding of the knowledge necessary for such tasks.

Related papers

• Epistemic Skills: Reasoning about Knowledge and Oblivion [0.8287206589886879]
  This paper captures the dynamics of acquiring knowledge and descending into oblivion, while incorporating concepts of group knowledge.<n>The computational complexity of the model checking and satisfiability problems is examined, offering insights into their theoretical foundations and practical implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T13:41:42Z)
• The Relativity of Causal Knowledge [4.051523221722475]
  Recent advances in artificial intelligence reveal the limits of purely predictive systems and call for a shift toward causal and collaborative reasoning.<n>We introduce the relativity of causal knowledge, which posits structural causal models (SCMs) are inherently imperfect, subjective representations embedded within networks of relationships.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T16:24:48Z)
• Crystal: Introspective Reasoners Reinforced with Self-Feedback [118.53428015478957]
  We propose a novel method to develop an introspective commonsense reasoner, Crystal. To tackle commonsense problems, it first introspects for knowledge statements related to the given question, and subsequently makes an informed prediction that is grounded in the previously introspected knowledge. Experiments show that Crystal significantly outperforms both the standard supervised finetuning and chain-of-thought distilled methods, and enhances the transparency of the commonsense reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T21:23:58Z)
• Learning by Applying: A General Framework for Mathematical Reasoning via Enhancing Explicit Knowledge Learning [47.96987739801807]
  We propose a framework to enhance existing models (backbones) in a principled way by explicit knowledge learning. In LeAp, we perform knowledge learning in a novel problem-knowledge-expression paradigm. We show that LeAp improves all backbones' performances, learns accurate knowledge, and achieves a more interpretable reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T15:15:41Z)
• Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual Explanations (XAI) [68.8204255655161]
  The emphasis of XAI research appears to have turned to a more pragmatic explanation approach for better understanding. An extensive area where cognitive science research may substantially influence XAI advancements is evaluating user knowledge and feedback. We propose a framework to experiment with generating and evaluating the explanations on the grounds of different cognitive levels of understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T19:20:22Z)
• Projection: A Mechanism for Human-like Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence [6.218613353519724]
  Methods of inference exploiting top-down information (from a model) have been shown to be effective for recognising entities in difficult conditions. Projection is shown to be a key mechanism to solve the problem of applying knowledge to varied or challenging situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-24T22:33:51Z)
• Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
  Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI) This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)
• Neuro-symbolic Architectures for Context Understanding [59.899606495602406]
  We propose the use of hybrid AI methodology as a framework for combining the strengths of data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches. Specifically, we inherit the concept of neuro-symbolism as a way of using knowledge-bases to guide the learning progress of deep neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-09T15:04:07Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.