Quantifying Robustness: A Benchmarking Framework for Deep Learning Forecasting in Cyber-Physical Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.03494v1
• Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:50:48 GMT
• Title: Quantifying Robustness: A Benchmarking Framework for Deep Learning Forecasting in Cyber-Physical Systems
• Authors: Alexander Windmann, Henrik Steude, Daniel Boschmann, Oliver Niggemann,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a practical robustness definition grounded in distributional robustness, explicitly tailored to industrial CPS.<n>Our framework simulates realistic disturbances, such as sensor drift, noise and irregular sampling, enabling thorough robustness analyses of forecasting models.
• Score: 44.61435605872856
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) in domains such as manufacturing and energy distribution generate complex time series data crucial for Prognostics and Health Management (PHM). While Deep Learning (DL) methods have demonstrated strong forecasting capabilities, their adoption in industrial CPS remains limited due insufficient robustness. Existing robustness evaluations primarily focus on formal verification or adversarial perturbations, inadequately representing the complexities encountered in real-world CPS scenarios. To address this, we introduce a practical robustness definition grounded in distributional robustness, explicitly tailored to industrial CPS, and propose a systematic framework for robustness evaluation. Our framework simulates realistic disturbances, such as sensor drift, noise and irregular sampling, enabling thorough robustness analyses of forecasting models on real-world CPS datasets. The robustness definition provides a standardized score to quantify and compare model performance across diverse datasets, assisting in informed model selection and architecture design. Through extensive empirical studies evaluating prominent DL architectures (including recurrent, convolutional, attention-based, modular, and structured state-space models) we demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of our approach. We publicly release our robustness benchmark to encourage further research and reproducibility.

Related papers

• Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Visual State Space Models [63.14954591606638]
  Vision State Space Models (VSSMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in visual perception tasks. However, their robustness under natural and adversarial perturbations remains a critical concern. We present a comprehensive evaluation of VSSMs' robustness under various perturbation scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T17:59:44Z)
• Benchmarking Zero-Shot Robustness of Multimodal Foundation Models: A Pilot Study [61.65123150513683]
  multimodal foundation models, such as CLIP, produce state-of-the-art zero-shot results. It is reported that these models close the robustness gap by matching the performance of supervised models trained on ImageNet. We show that CLIP leads to a significant robustness drop compared to supervised ImageNet models on our benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T17:33:49Z)
• On the Foundation of Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning [19.621038847810198]
  We contribute to the theoretical foundation of distributionally robust reinforcement learning (DRRL) This framework obliges the decision maker to choose an optimal policy under the worst-case distributional shift orchestrated by an adversary. Within this DRMDP framework, we investigate conditions for the existence or absence of the dynamic programming principle (DPP)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T15:02:23Z)
• Investigating Robustness in Cyber-Physical Systems: Specification-Centric Analysis in the face of System Deviations [8.8690305802668]
  A critical attribute of cyber-physical systems (CPS) is robustness, denoting its capacity to operate safely. This paper proposes a novel specification-based robustness, which characterizes the effectiveness of a controller in meeting a specified system requirement. We present an innovative two-layer simulation-based analysis framework designed to identify subtle robustness violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T16:44:43Z)
• Robustness and Generalization Performance of Deep Learning Models on Cyber-Physical Systems: A Comparative Study [71.84852429039881]
  Investigation focuses on the models' ability to handle a range of perturbations, such as sensor faults and noise. We test the generalization and transfer learning capabilities of these models by exposing them to out-of-distribution (OOD) samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T12:43:59Z)
• On the Robustness of Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis: Rethinking Model, Data, and Training [109.9218185711916]
  Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) aims at automatically inferring the specific sentiment polarities toward certain aspects of products or services behind social media texts or reviews. We propose to enhance the ABSA robustness by systematically rethinking the bottlenecks from all possible angles, including model, data, and training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T11:07:43Z)
• Leveraging the structure of dynamical systems for data-driven modeling [111.45324708884813]
  We consider the impact of the training set and its structure on the quality of the long-term prediction. We show how an informed design of the training set, based on invariants of the system and the structure of the underlying attractor, significantly improves the resulting models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T20:09:20Z)
• Robustness in Deep Learning for Computer Vision: Mind the gap? [13.576376492050185]
  We identify, analyze, and summarize current definitions and progress towards non-adversarial robustness in deep learning for computer vision. We find that this area of research has received disproportionately little attention relative to adversarial machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-01T16:42:38Z)
• A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Deep Model Robustness [44.20580847861682]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable performance across a wide area of applications. They are vulnerable to adversarial examples, which motivates the adversarial defense. This paper presents a model evaluation framework containing a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent set of evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-24T01:04:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.