StyleRec: A Benchmark Dataset for Prompt Recovery in Writing Style Transformation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.04373v1
• Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 06:02:28 GMT
• Title: StyleRec: A Benchmark Dataset for Prompt Recovery in Writing Style Transformation
• Authors: Shenyang Liu, Yang Gao, Shaoyan Zhai, Liqiang Wang,
• Abstract summary: This paper explores a unique prompt recovery task focused on reconstructing prompts for style transfer and rephrasing.<n>We introduce a dataset created with LLM assistance, ensuring quality through multiple techniques.<n>Our results show that one-shot and fine-tuning yield the best outcomes but highlight flaws in traditional sentence similarity metrics.
• Score: 16.666885275128507
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Prompt Recovery, reconstructing prompts from the outputs of large language models (LLMs), has grown in importance as LLMs become ubiquitous. Most users access LLMs through APIs without internal model weights, relying only on outputs and logits, which complicates recovery. This paper explores a unique prompt recovery task focused on reconstructing prompts for style transfer and rephrasing, rather than typical question-answering. We introduce a dataset created with LLM assistance, ensuring quality through multiple techniques, and test methods like zero-shot, few-shot, jailbreak, chain-of-thought, fine-tuning, and a novel canonical-prompt fallback for poor-performing cases. Our results show that one-shot and fine-tuning yield the best outcomes but highlight flaws in traditional sentence similarity metrics for evaluating prompt recovery. Contributions include (1) a benchmark dataset, (2) comprehensive experiments on prompt recovery strategies, and (3) identification of limitations in current evaluation metrics, all of which advance general prompt recovery research, where the structure of the input prompt is unrestricted.

Related papers

• RALLRec+: Retrieval Augmented Large Language Model Recommendation with Reasoning [22.495874056980824]
  We propose Representation learning and textbfReasoning empowered retrieval-textbfAugmented textbfLarge textbfLanguage model textbfRecommendation (RALLRec+).
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T11:03:34Z)
• R-Bot: An LLM-based Query Rewrite System [15.46599915198438]
  We propose R-Bot, a query rewrite system based on machine learning. We first design a multi-source rewrite evidence preparation pipeline to generate query rewrite evidences. We then propose a hybrid-semantics retrieval method that combines structural and semantic analysis. We conduct comprehensive experiments on widely used benchmarks, and demonstrate the superior performance of our system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T16:13:04Z)
• MaFeRw: Query Rewriting with Multi-Aspect Feedbacks for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [22.50450558103786]
  In a real-world RAG system, the current query often involves spoken ellipses and ambiguous references from dialogue contexts. We propose a novel query rewriting method MaFeRw, which improves RAG performance by integrating multi-aspect feedback from both the retrieval process and generated results. Experimental results on two conversational RAG datasets demonstrate that MaFeRw achieves superior generation metrics and more stable training compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T07:57:30Z)
• FIRST: Faster Improved Listwise Reranking with Single Token Decoding [56.727761901751194]
  First, we introduce FIRST, a novel listwise LLM reranking approach leveraging the output logits of the first generated identifier to directly obtain a ranked ordering of the candidates. Empirical results demonstrate that FIRST accelerates inference by 50% while maintaining a robust ranking performance with gains across the BEIR benchmark. Our results show that LLM rerankers can provide a stronger distillation signal compared to cross-encoders, yielding substantial improvements in retriever recall after relevance feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T21:27:50Z)
• DORY: Deliberative Prompt Recovery for LLM [11.988508965818767]
  Deliberative PrOmpt RecoverY (DORY) is a novel approach that leverages uncertainty to recover prompts accurately. DORY involves reconstructing drafts from outputs, refining these with hints, and filtering out noise based on uncertainty. Our evaluation shows that DORY outperforms existing baselines, improving performance by approximately 10.82%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T07:51:16Z)
• PromptReps: Prompting Large Language Models to Generate Dense and Sparse Representations for Zero-Shot Document Retrieval [76.50690734636477]
  We propose PromptReps, which combines the advantages of both categories: no need for training and the ability to retrieve from the whole corpus. The retrieval system harnesses both dense text embedding and sparse bag-of-words representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T04:51:30Z)
• SuRe: Summarizing Retrievals using Answer Candidates for Open-domain QA of LLMs [85.54906813106683]
  We propose a simple yet effective framework to enhance open-domain question answering (ODQA) with large language models (LLMs) SuRe helps LLMs predict more accurate answers for a given question, which are well-supported by the summarized retrieval (SuRe) Experimental results on diverse ODQA benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of SuRe, with improvements of up to 4.6% in exact match (EM) and 4.0% in F1 score over standard prompting approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T01:15:54Z)
• Revisiting Large Language Models as Zero-shot Relation Extractors [8.953462875381888]
  Relation extraction (RE) consistently involves a certain degree of labeled or unlabeled data even if under zero-shot setting. Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) transfer well to new tasks out-of-the-box simply given a natural language prompt. This work focuses on the study of exploring LLMs as zero-shot relation extractors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T06:17:39Z)
• Do Compressed LLMs Forget Knowledge? An Experimental Study with Practical Implications [63.29358103217275]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often leads to reduced performance, especially for knowledge-intensive tasks. We propose two conjectures on the nature of the damage: one is certain knowledge being forgotten (or erased) after compression. We introduce a variant called Inference-time Dynamic Prompting (IDP) that can effectively increase prompt diversity without incurring any inference overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T03:12:06Z)
• Query-Dependent Prompt Evaluation and Optimization with Offline Inverse RL [62.824464372594576]
  We aim to enhance arithmetic reasoning ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) through zero-shot prompt optimization. We identify a previously overlooked objective of query dependency in such optimization. We introduce Prompt-OIRL, which harnesses offline inverse reinforcement learning to draw insights from offline prompting demonstration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T01:12:52Z)
• Re-Reading Improves Reasoning in Large Language Models [87.46256176508376]
  We introduce a simple, yet general and effective prompting method, Re2, to enhance the reasoning capabilities of off-the-shelf Large Language Models (LLMs) Unlike most thought-eliciting prompting methods, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT), Re2 shifts the focus to the input by processing questions twice, thereby enhancing the understanding process. We evaluate Re2 on extensive reasoning benchmarks across 14 datasets, spanning 112 experiments, to validate its effectiveness and generality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T14:36:23Z)
• Query Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [139.242907155883]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play powerful, black-box readers in the retrieve-then-read pipeline. This work introduces a new framework, Rewrite-Retrieve-Read instead of the previous retrieve-then-read for the retrieval-augmented LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:27:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.