Leveraging deep learning for plant disease identification: a bibliometric analysis in SCOPUS from 2018 to 2024

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.07342v1
• Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 23:57:30 GMT
• Title: Leveraging deep learning for plant disease identification: a bibliometric analysis in SCOPUS from 2018 to 2024
• Authors: Enow Takang Achuo Albert, Ngalle Hermine Bille, Ngonkeu Mangaptche Eddy Leonard,
• Abstract summary: This work aimed to present a bibliometric analysis of deep learning research for plant disease identification.<n>A thorough analysis of SCOPUS-sourced bibliometric data from 253 documents was performed.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This work aimed to present a bibliometric analysis of deep learning research for plant disease identification, with a special focus on generative modeling. A thorough analysis of SCOPUS-sourced bibliometric data from 253 documents was performed. Key performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were analyzed for generative modeling. The findings highlighted significant contributions from some authors Too and Arnal Barbedo, whose works had notable citation counts, suggesting their influence on the academic community. Co-authorship networks revealed strong collaborative clusters, while keyword analysis identified emerging research gaps. This study highlights the role of collaboration and citation metrics in shaping research directions and enhancing the impact of scholarly work in applications of deep learning to plant disease identification. Future research should explore the methodologies of highly cited studies to inform best practices and policy-making.

Related papers

• ResearchBench: Benchmarking LLMs in Scientific Discovery via Inspiration-Based Task Decomposition [67.26124739345332]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in assisting scientific research, yet their ability to discover high-quality research hypotheses remains unexamined.<n>We introduce the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating LLMs with a near-sufficient set of sub-tasks of scientific discovery.<n>We develop an automated framework that extracts critical components - research questions, background surveys, inspirations, and hypotheses - from scientific papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T08:09:15Z)
• Automatic Detection of Research Values from Scientific Abstracts Across Computer Science Subfields [32.82061305764996]
  It is crucial to explore what specific research values, known as basic and fundamental beliefs that guide or motivate research attitudes or actions.<n>Prior research has manually analyzed research values from a small sample of machine learning papers.<n>This paper introduces a detailed annotation scheme featuring ten research values that guide CS-related research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T00:44:27Z)
• Causal Representation Learning from Multimodal Biomedical Observations [57.00712157758845]
  We develop flexible identification conditions for multimodal data and principled methods to facilitate the understanding of biomedical datasets.<n>Key theoretical contribution is the structural sparsity of causal connections between modalities.<n>Results on a real-world human phenotype dataset are consistent with established biomedical research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-10T16:40:27Z)
• CiteFusion: An Ensemble Framework for Citation Intent Classification Harnessing Dual-Model Binary Couples and SHAP Analyses [1.7812428873698407]
  This study introduces CiteFusion, an ensemble framework designed to address the multiclass Citation Intent Classification task.<n>CiteFusion achieves state-of-the-art performance, with Macro-F1 scores of 89.60% on SciCite and 76.24% on ACL-ARC.<n>We release a web-based application that classifies citation intents leveraging CiteFusion models developed on SciCite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T09:29:33Z)
• Large Language Models as Biomedical Hypothesis Generators: A Comprehensive Evaluation [15.495976478018264]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a promising tool to revolutionize knowledge interaction. We construct a dataset of background-hypothesis pairs from biomedical literature, partitioned into training, seen, and unseen test sets. We assess the hypothesis generation capabilities of top-tier instructed models in zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T02:55:13Z)
• ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Models [56.08917291606421]
  ResearchAgent is an AI-based system for ideation and operationalization of novel work.<n>ResearchAgent automatically defines novel problems, proposes methods and designs experiments, while iteratively refining them.<n>We experimentally validate our ResearchAgent on scientific publications across multiple disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T13:36:29Z)
• A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [55.33653554387953]
  Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) has led to numerous literature reviews aimed at collecting and fragmented information.<n>This paper presents a thorough analysis of these literature reviews within the PAMI field.<n>We try to address three core research questions: (1) What are the prevalent structural and statistical characteristics of PAMI literature reviews; (2) What strategies can researchers employ to efficiently navigate the growing corpus of reviews; and (3) What are the advantages and limitations of AI-generated reviews compared to human-authored ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z)
• A Reliable Knowledge Processing Framework for Combustion Science using Foundation Models [0.0]
  The study introduces an approach to process diverse combustion research data, spanning experimental studies, simulations, and literature. The developed approach minimizes computational and economic expenses while optimizing data privacy and accuracy. The framework consistently delivers accurate domain-specific responses with minimal human oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T17:15:25Z)
• De-identification of clinical free text using natural language processing: A systematic review of current approaches [48.343430343213896]
  Natural language processing has repeatedly demonstrated its feasibility in automating the de-identification process. Our study aims to provide systematic evidence on how the de-identification of clinical free text has evolved in the last thirteen years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T13:20:41Z)
• MRI Images, Brain Lesions and Deep Learning [0.0]
  We review the published literature on systems and algorithms that allow for classification, identification, and detection of White Matter Hyperintensities (WMHs) of brain MRI images. There is constant growth in the research and proposal of new models of deep learning to achieve the highest accuracy and reliability of the segmentation of ischemic and demyelinating lesions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T14:18:48Z)
• A bibliometric analysis of research based on the Roy Adaptation Model: a contribution to Nursing [0.0]
  To perform a modern bibliometric analysis of the research based on the Roy Adaptation Model, a founding nursing model proposed by Sor Callista Roy in the1970s. We used information from the two dominant scientific databases, Web Of Science and SCOPUS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-29T14:02:16Z)
• Opportunities and Challenges of Deep Learning Methods for Electrocardiogram Data: A Systematic Review [62.490310870300746]
  The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most commonly used diagnostic tools in medicine and healthcare. Deep learning methods have achieved promising results on predictive healthcare tasks using ECG signals. This paper presents a systematic review of deep learning methods for ECG data from both modeling and application perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-28T02:44:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.