Towards More Efficient, Robust, Instance-adaptive, and Generalizable Sequential Decision making

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09192v4
• Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 06:21:11 GMT
• Title: Towards More Efficient, Robust, Instance-adaptive, and Generalizable Sequential Decision making
• Authors: Zhiyong Wang,
• Abstract summary: My work focuses on reinforcement learning (RL), multi-armed bandits, and their applications.<n>My research aims to develop more efficient, robust, instance-adaptive, and generalizable sequential decision-making algorithms.
• Score: 9.955716251167424
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The primary goal of my Ph.D. study is to develop provably efficient and practical algorithms for data-driven sequential decision-making under uncertainty. My work focuses on reinforcement learning (RL), multi-armed bandits, and their applications, including recommendation systems, computer networks, video analytics, and large language models (LLMs). Sequential decision-making methods, such as bandits and RL, have demonstrated remarkable success - ranging from outperforming human players in complex games like Atari and Go to advancing robotics, recommendation systems, and fine-tuning LLMs. Despite these successes, many established algorithms rely on idealized models that can fail under model misspecifications or adversarial perturbations, particularly in settings where accurate prior knowledge of the underlying model class is unavailable or where malicious users operate within dynamic systems. These challenges are pervasive in real-world applications, where robust and adaptive solutions are critical. Furthermore, while worst-case guarantees provide theoretical reliability, they often fail to capture instance-dependent performance, which can lead to more efficient and practical solutions. Another key challenge lies in generalizing to new, unseen environments, a crucial requirement for deploying these methods in dynamic and unpredictable settings. To address these limitations, my research aims to develop more efficient, robust, instance-adaptive, and generalizable sequential decision-making algorithms for both reinforcement learning and bandits. Towards this end, I focus on developing more efficient, robust, instance-adaptive, and generalizable for both general reinforcement learning (RL) and bandits.

Related papers

• Application of LLM Guided Reinforcement Learning in Formation Control with Collision Avoidance [1.1718316049475228]
  Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) excel at accomplishing complex objectives through the collaborative efforts of individual agents.<n>In this paper, we introduce a novel framework that aims to overcome the challenge of designing an effective reward function.<n>By giving large language models (LLMs) on the prioritization of tasks, our framework generates reward functions that can be dynamically adjusted online.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T09:26:00Z)
• Control-Optimized Deep Reinforcement Learning for Artificially Intelligent Autonomous Systems [8.766411351797885]
  Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has become a powerful tool for complex decision-making in machine learning and AI.<n>Traditional methods often assume perfect action execution, overlooking the uncertainties and deviations between an agent's selected actions and the actual system response.<n>This work advances AI by developing a novel control-optimized DRL framework that explicitly models and compensates for action execution mismatches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T21:25:52Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Machine Learning Model Deployment: Evaluating Multi-Armed Bandits in ML Ops Environments [0.0]
  We investigate whether reinforcement learning (RL)-based model management can manage deployment decisions more effectively.<n>Our approach enables more adaptive production environments by continuously evaluating deployed models and rolling back underperforming ones in real-time.<n>Our findings suggest that RL-based model management can improve automation, reduce reliance on manual interventions, and mitigate risks associated with post-deployment model failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T16:42:21Z)
• Revisiting Robust RAG: Do We Still Need Complex Robust Training in the Era of Powerful LLMs? [69.38149239733994]
  We investigate whether complex robust training strategies remain necessary as model capacity grows.<n>We find that as models become more powerful, the performance gains brought by complex robust training methods drop off dramatically.<n>Our findings suggest that RAG systems can benefit from simpler architectures and training strategies as models become more powerful.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T03:34:31Z)
• Robotic World Model: A Neural Network Simulator for Robust Policy Optimization in Robotics [50.191655141020505]
  We introduce a novel framework for learning world models.<n>By providing a scalable and robust framework, we pave the way for adaptive and efficient robotic systems in real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-17T10:39:09Z)
• On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision Making [52.128546842746246]
  Large pretrained models are showing increasingly better performance in reasoning and planning tasks. We evaluate their ability to produce decision-making policies, either directly, by generating actions, or indirectly. In environments with unfamiliar dynamics, we explore how fine-tuning LLMs with synthetic data can significantly improve their reward modeling capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T03:12:57Z)
• Memory-Enhanced Neural Solvers for Efficient Adaptation in Combinatorial Optimization [6.713974813995327]
  We present MEMENTO, an approach that leverages memory to improve the adaptation of neural solvers at time. We successfully train all RL auto-regressive solvers on large instances, and show that MEMENTO can scale and is data-efficient. Overall, MEMENTO enables to push the state-of-the-art on 11 out of 12 evaluated tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T08:18:19Z)
• Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning Methods [97.2995389188179]
  This paper seeks to refine the evaluation of machine unlearning for large language models.<n>It addresses two key challenges -- the robustness of evaluation metrics and the trade-offs between competing goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• Learning Reward and Policy Jointly from Demonstration and Preference Improves Alignment [58.049113055986375]
  We develop a single stage approach named Alignment with Integrated Human Feedback (AIHF) to train reward models and the policy.<n>The proposed approach admits a suite of efficient algorithms, which can easily reduce to, and leverage, popular alignment algorithms.<n>We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed solutions with extensive experiments involving alignment problems in LLMs and robotic control problems in MuJoCo.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T01:20:53Z)
• SERL: A Software Suite for Sample-Efficient Robotic Reinforcement Learning [82.46975428739329]
  We develop a library containing a sample efficient off-policy deep RL method, together with methods for computing rewards and resetting the environment. We find that our implementation can achieve very efficient learning, acquiring policies for PCB board assembly, cable routing, and object relocation. These policies achieve perfect or near-perfect success rates, extreme robustness even under perturbations, and exhibit emergent robustness recovery and correction behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T10:01:10Z)
• Machine Learning Insides OptVerse AI Solver: Design Principles and Applications [74.67495900436728]
  We present a comprehensive study on the integration of machine learning (ML) techniques into Huawei Cloud's OptVerse AI solver. We showcase our methods for generating complex SAT and MILP instances utilizing generative models that mirror multifaceted structures of real-world problem. We detail the incorporation of state-of-the-art parameter tuning algorithms which markedly elevate solver performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T15:02:15Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Diverse Human Preferences [68.4294547285359]
  This paper develops a method for crowd-sourcing preference labels and learning from diverse human preferences. The proposed method is tested on a variety of tasks in DMcontrol and Meta-world. It has shown consistent and significant improvements over existing preference-based RL algorithms when learning from diverse feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T15:18:54Z)
• A Transferable and Automatic Tuning of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cost Effective Phishing Detection [21.481974148873807]
  Many challenging real-world problems require the deployment of ensembles multiple complementary learning models. Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) offers a cost-effective alternative, where detectors are dynamically chosen based on the output of their predecessors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-19T14:09:07Z)
• Robust Reinforcement Learning using Offline Data [23.260211453437055]
  We propose a robust reinforcement learning algorithm called Robust Fitted Q-Iteration (RFQI) RFQI uses only an offline dataset to learn the optimal robust policy. We prove that RFQI learns a near-optimal robust policy under standard assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T03:47:45Z)
• Information Theoretic Model Predictive Q-Learning [64.74041985237105]
  We present a novel theoretical connection between information theoretic MPC and entropy regularized RL. We develop a Q-learning algorithm that can leverage biased models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-31T00:29:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.