The Future of MLLM Prompting is Adaptive: A Comprehensive Experimental Evaluation of Prompt Engineering Methods for Robust Multimodal Performance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10179v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 12:31:39 GMT
• Title: The Future of MLLM Prompting is Adaptive: A Comprehensive Experimental Evaluation of Prompt Engineering Methods for Robust Multimodal Performance
• Authors: Anwesha Mohanty, Venkatesh Balavadhani Parthasarathy, Arsalan Shahid,
• Abstract summary: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are set to transform how machines process and generate human-like responses.<n>We present a comprehensive experimental evaluation of seven prompt engineering methods applied to 13 open-source MLLMs over 24 tasks.
• Score: 0.393259574660092
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are set to transform how machines process and generate human-like responses by integrating diverse modalities such as text, images, and code. Yet, effectively harnessing their capabilities hinges on optimal prompt engineering. We present a comprehensive experimental evaluation of seven prompt engineering methods applied to 13 open-source MLLMs over 24 tasks spanning Reasoning and Compositionality, Multimodal Understanding and Alignment, Complex Code Generation and Execution, and Knowledge Retrieval and Integration. Our approach stratifies models by parameter count into Small (<4B), Medium (4B-10B), and Large (>10B) categories and compares prompting techniques including Zero-Shot, One-Shot, Few-Shot, Chain-of-Thought, Analogical, Generated Knowledge, and Tree-of-Thought. While Large MLLMs excel in structured tasks such as code generation, achieving accuracies up to 96.88% under Few-Shot prompting, all models struggle with complex reasoning and abstract understanding, often yielding accuracies below 60% and high hallucination rates. Structured reasoning prompts frequently increased hallucination up to 75% in small models and led to longer response times (over 20 seconds in Large MLLMs), while simpler prompting methods provided more concise and efficient outputs. No single prompting method uniformly optimises all task types. Instead, adaptive strategies combining example-based guidance with selective structured reasoning are essential to enhance robustness, efficiency, and factual accuracy. Our findings offer practical recommendations for prompt engineering and support more reliable deployment of MLLMs across applications including AI-assisted coding, knowledge retrieval, and multimodal content understanding.

Related papers

• Multi2: Multi-Agent Test-Time Scalable Framework for Multi-Document Processing [35.686125031177234]
  Multi-Document Summarization (MDS) is a challenging task that focuses on extracting and synthesizing useful information from multiple lengthy documents.<n>We propose a novel framework that leverages inference-time scaling for this task.<n>We also introduce two new evaluation metrics: Consistency-Aware Preference (CAP) score and LLM Atom-Content-Unit (ACU) score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T23:34:47Z)
• Progressive Multimodal Reasoning via Active Retrieval [64.74746997923967]
  Multi-step multimodal reasoning tasks pose significant challenges for large language models (MLLMs)<n>We propose AR-MCTS, a universal framework designed to progressively improve the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.<n>We show that AR-MCTS can optimize sampling diversity and accuracy, yielding reliable multimodal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:25:39Z)
• GRL-Prompt: Towards Knowledge Graph based Prompt Optimization via Reinforcement Learning [8.307785339429863]
  We propose a novel framework for prompt optimization for large language models (LLMs) GRL-Prompt aims to automatically construct optimal prompts via reinforcement learning (RL) in an end-to-end manner. Experiments show that GRL-Prompt outperforms recent state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T10:52:25Z)
• RA-BLIP: Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training [55.54020926284334]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently received substantial interest, which shows their emerging potential as general-purpose models for various vision-language tasks. Retrieval augmentation techniques have proven to be effective plugins for both LLMs and MLLMs. In this study, we propose multimodal adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training (RA-BLIP), a novel retrieval-augmented framework for various MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T03:45:19Z)
• QPO: Query-dependent Prompt Optimization via Multi-Loop Offline Reinforcement Learning [58.767866109043055]
  We introduce Query-dependent Prompt Optimization (QPO), which iteratively fine-tune a small pretrained language model to generate optimal prompts tailored to the input queries. We derive insights from offline prompting demonstration data, which already exists in large quantities as a by-product of benchmarking diverse prompts on open-sourced tasks. Experiments on various LLM scales and diverse NLP and math tasks demonstrate the efficacy and cost-efficiency of our method in both zero-shot and few-shot scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T03:06:48Z)
• Fine-tuning Multimodal Large Language Models for Product Bundling [53.01642741096356]
  We introduce Bundle-MLLM, a novel framework that fine-tunes large language models (LLMs) through a hybrid item tokenization approach.<n>Specifically, we integrate textual, media, and relational data into a unified tokenization, introducing a soft separation token to distinguish between textual and non-textual tokens.<n>We propose a progressive optimization strategy that fine-tunes LLMs for disentangled objectives: 1) learning bundle patterns and 2) enhancing multimodal semantic understanding specific to product bundling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T13:30:14Z)
• PromptWizard: Task-Aware Prompt Optimization Framework [2.618253052454435]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed AI across diverse domains. Manual prompt engineering is both labor-intensive and domain-specific. We introduce PromptWizard, a novel, fully automated framework for discrete prompt optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T17:08:31Z)
• Efficient Prompting Methods for Large Language Models: A Survey [50.82812214830023]
  Efficient Prompting Methods have attracted a wide range of attention.<n>We discuss Automatic Prompt Engineering for different prompt components and Prompt Compression in continuous and discrete spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T12:19:08Z)
• Towards Generalist Prompting for Large Language Models by Mental Models [105.03747314550591]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on many tasks. To achieve optimal performance, specially designed prompting methods are still needed. We introduce the concept of generalist prompting, which operates on the design principle of achieving optimal or near-optimal performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T11:29:09Z)
• Intent-based Prompt Calibration: Enhancing prompt optimization with synthetic boundary cases [2.6159111710501506]
  We introduce a new method for automatic prompt engineering, using a calibration process that iteratively refines the prompt to the user intent. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method with respect to strong proprietary models on real-world tasks such as moderation and generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T15:28:43Z)
• RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts With Reinforcement Learning [84.75064077323098]
  This paper proposes RLPrompt, an efficient discrete prompt optimization approach with reinforcement learning (RL) RLPrompt is flexibly applicable to different types of LMs, such as masked gibberish (e.g., grammaBERT) and left-to-right models (e.g., GPTs) Experiments on few-shot classification and unsupervised text style transfer show superior performance over a wide range of existing finetuning or prompting methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T07:50:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.