EMAFusion: A Self-Optimizing System for Seamless LLM Selection and Integration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10681v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:04:54 GMT
• Title: EMAFusion: A Self-Optimizing System for Seamless LLM Selection and Integration
• Abstract summary: We introduce EMAFusion, a new framework that self-optimizes for LLM selection and reliable execution for a given query.<n>We find EMAFusion outperforms the best individual models by over 2.6 percentage points (94.3% vs. 91.7%) while being 4X cheaper than the average cost.<n>Our combined routing approach delivers 94.3% accuracy compared to taxonomy-based (88.1%) and learned model predictor-based (91.7%) methods alone.
• Score: 9.019951211182969
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: While recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced performance across diverse natural language tasks, the high computational and financial costs associated with their deployment remain substantial barriers. Existing routing strategies partially alleviate this challenge by assigning queries to cheaper or specialized models, but they frequently rely on extensive labeled data or fragile task-specific heuristics. Conversely, fusion techniques aggregate multiple LLM outputs to boost accuracy and robustness, yet they often exacerbate cost and may reinforce shared biases. We introduce EMAFusion, a new framework that self-optimizes for seamless LLM selection and reliable execution for a given query. Specifically, EMAFusion integrates a taxonomy-based router for familiar query types, a learned router for ambiguous inputs, and a cascading approach that progressively escalates from cheaper to more expensive models based on multi-judge confidence evaluations. Through extensive evaluations, we find EMAFusion outperforms the best individual models by over 2.6 percentage points (94.3% vs. 91.7%), while being 4X cheaper than the average cost. EMAFusion further achieves a remarkable 17.1 percentage point improvement over models like GPT-4 at less than 1/20th the cost. Our combined routing approach delivers 94.3% accuracy compared to taxonomy-based (88.1%) and learned model predictor-based (91.7%) methods alone, demonstrating the effectiveness of our unified strategy. Finally, EMAFusion supports flexible cost-accuracy trade-offs, allowing users to balance their budgetary constraints and performance needs.

Related papers

• RouteLMT: Learned Sample Routing for Hybrid LLM Translation Deployment [57.588738943463646]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in Machine Translation (MT)<n> deploying them at scale remains prohibitively expensive.<n>We propose textbfRouteLMT, an in-model router that predicts the expected gain by probing the small translators prompt-token representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T13:02:45Z)
• RouteMoA: Dynamic Routing without Pre-Inference Boosts Efficient Mixture-of-Agents [91.0187958746262]
  RouteMoA is an efficient mixture-of-agents framework with dynamic routing.<n>It employs a lightweight scorer to perform initial screening by predicting coarse-grained performance from the query.<n>It refines these scores through lightweight self- and cross-assessment based on existing model outputs, providing posterior correction without additional inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T04:22:22Z)
• MergeMix: Optimizing Mid-Training Data Mixtures via Learnable Model Merging [72.00014675808228]
  textbfMix determines optimal data mixing ratios by repurposing model merging weights as a high-fidelity, low-cost performance proxy.<n>Experiments on models with 8B and 16B parameters validate that MergeMix achieves performance comparable to or surpassing exhaustive manual tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T14:31:57Z)
• Don't Start Over: A Cost-Effective Framework for Migrating Personalized Prompts Between LLMs [51.79252689855809]
  Personalization in Large Language Models (LLMs) often relies on user-specific soft prompts.<n>We propose the Prompt-level User Migration Adapter (PUMA), a framework to efficiently migrate personalized prompts across incompatible models.<n>Experiments on three large-scale datasets show our method matches or even surpasses the performance of retraining from scratch, reducing computational cost by up to 98%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-17T12:30:31Z)
• SPEAR-MM: Selective Parameter Evaluation and Restoration via Model Merging for Efficient Financial LLM Adaptation [7.761546505292692]
  Large language models (LLMs) adapted to financial domains often suffer from catastrophic forgetting of general reasoning capabilities.<n>We introduce Selective Evaluation and Restoration via Model Merging (SPEAR-MM), a practical framework that preserves critical capabilities while enabling domain adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T17:34:31Z)
• A$^2$FM: An Adaptive Agent Foundation Model for Tool-Aware Hybrid Reasoning [40.6234318894435]
  Large language models split into two families: reasoning-centric LLMs and agentic LLMs.<n>This divide arises from fundamentally different training objectives, leading to mismatched strengths and inefficiency on simple queries.<n>We present Adaptive Agent Foundation Model (A$2$FM), a unified framework that follows a route-then-align principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T17:08:25Z)
• One Head, Many Models: Cross-Attention Routing for Cost-Aware LLM Selection [3.872690949369412]
  Large language models (LLMs) with varying computational costs and performance profiles present a critical challenge for scalable, cost-effective deployment in real-world applications.<n>We introduce a unified routing framework that leverages a single-head cross-attention mechanism to jointly model query and model embeddings.<n>By explicitly capturing fine-grained query-model interactions, our router predicts both response quality and generation cost, achieving up to 6.6% improvement in Average Improvement in Quality (AIQ) and 2.9% in maximum performance over existing routers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T18:29:09Z)
• A thorough benchmark of automatic text classification: From traditional approaches to large language models [9.069939079065298]
  This study investigates whether the effectiveness gains of recent approaches compensate their much higher costs.<n>It includes a scientifically sound comparative analysis of the cost-benefit of twelve traditional and recent ATC solutions.<n>The release of code, data, and documentation enables the community to replicate experiments and advance the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T17:40:08Z)
• Data Mixture Optimization: A Multi-fidelity Multi-scale Bayesian Framework [10.317740844867913]
  We build a simulator based on 472 language model pre-training runs with varying data compositions from the SlimPajama dataset.<n>We observe that even simple acquisition functions can enable principled training decisions across training models from 20M to 1B kernels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-26T22:19:47Z)
• MixLLM: Dynamic Routing in Mixed Large Language Models [57.309520357563215]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit potential artificial generic intelligence recently, however, their usage is costly with high response latency.<n>We develop MixLLM, a dynamic contextual-bandit-based routing system for query-LLM assignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T02:26:15Z)
• Adaptive Pruning for Large Language Models with Structural Importance Awareness [66.2690963378878]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved language understanding and generation capabilities.<n>LLMs are difficult to deploy on resource-constrained edge devices due to their high computational and storage resource demands.<n>We propose structurally-aware adaptive pruning (SAAP) to significantly reduce the computational and memory costs while maintaining model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T18:08:04Z)
• EACO: Enhancing Alignment in Multimodal LLMs via Critical Observation [58.546205554954454]
  We propose Enhancing Alignment in MLLMs via Critical Observation (EACO) EACO aligns MLLMs by self-generated preference data using only 5k images economically. EACO reduces the overall hallucinations by 65.6% on HallusionBench and improves the reasoning ability by 21.8% on MME-Cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T09:59:47Z)
• Enhancing the Reasoning Ability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Mixed Preference Optimization [65.64108848398696]
  We introduce a preference optimization (PO) process to enhance the multimodal reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.<n>Specifically, we design an automated preference data construction pipeline to create MMPR, a high-quality, large-scale multimodal reasoning preference dataset.<n>We explore integrating PO with MLLMs, developing a simple yet effective method, termed Mixed Preference Optimization (MPO), which boosts multimodal CoT performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T18:59:27Z)
• FactorLLM: Factorizing Knowledge via Mixture of Experts for Large Language Models [50.331708897857574]
  We introduce FactorLLM, a novel approach that decomposes well-trained dense FFNs into sparse sub-networks without requiring any further modifications. FactorLLM achieves comparable performance to the source model securing up to 85% model performance while obtaining over a 30% increase in inference speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T16:45:16Z)
• Cost-efficient Knowledge-based Question Answering with Large Language Models [28.816821631082856]
  Knowledge-based question answering (KBQA) is widely used in many scenarios that necessitate domain knowledge. Large language models (LLMs) bring opportunities to KBQA, while their costs are significantly higher and absence of domain-specific knowledge during pre-training. We propose Coke, a novel cost-efficient strategy for KBQA with LLMs, modeled as a tailored multi-armed bandit problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T16:37:34Z)
• OptLLM: Optimal Assignment of Queries to Large Language Models [12.07164196530872]
  We propose a framework for addressing the cost-effective query allocation problem for large language models (LLMs) Our framework, named OptLLM, provides users with a range of optimal solutions to choose from, aligning with their budget constraints and performance preferences. To evaluate the effectiveness of OptLLM, we conduct extensive experiments on various types of tasks, including text classification, question answering, sentiment analysis, reasoning, and log parsing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T01:05:37Z)
• SMART: Automatically Scaling Down Language Models with Accuracy Guarantees for Reduced Processing Fees [21.801053526411415]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly boosted performance in natural language processing (NLP) tasks. The deployment of high-performance LLMs incurs substantial costs, primarily due to the increased number of parameters aimed at enhancing model performance. We introduce SMART, a novel framework designed to minimize the inference costs of NLP tasks while ensuring sufficient result quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T17:45:47Z)
• Democratizing LLMs: An Exploration of Cost-Performance Trade-offs in Self-Refined Open-Source Models [53.859446823312126]
  SoTA open source models of varying sizes from 7B - 65B, on average, improve 8.2% from their baseline performance. Strikingly, even models with extremely small memory footprints, such as Vicuna-7B, show a 11.74% improvement overall and up to a 25.39% improvement in high-creativity, open ended tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T15:56:00Z)
• Confronting Reward Model Overoptimization with Constrained RLHF [114.71591361764547]
  We show that correlation between component RMs has a significant effect on the locations of these points. Our method addresses the problem of weighting component RMs by learning dynamic weights, naturally expressed by Lagrange multipliers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T16:59:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.