Benchmarking Next-Generation Reasoning-Focused Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Head-to-Head Evaluation on 5,888 Items

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11186v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 13:42:34 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Next-Generation Reasoning-Focused Large Language Models in Ophthalmology: A Head-to-Head Evaluation on 5,888 Items
• Abstract summary: This study comprehensively evaluated and compared the accuracy and reasoning capabilities of four newly developed reasoning-focused LLMs.<n>O1 and DeepSeek-R1 achieved the highest accuracy, with o1 also leading in Macro-F1 (0.900).<n>The performance of models across the text-generation metrics varied: o3-mini excelled in ROUGE-L (0.151), o1 in METEOR (0.232), DeepSeek-R1 and o3-mini tied for BERTScore (0.673), DeepSeek-R1 (-4.105) and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Thinking (-4.127) performed best in BART
• Score: 5.087573829521397
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in reasoning-focused large language models (LLMs) mark a shift from general LLMs toward models designed for complex decision-making, a crucial aspect in medicine. However, their performance in specialized domains like ophthalmology remains underexplored. This study comprehensively evaluated and compared the accuracy and reasoning capabilities of four newly developed reasoning-focused LLMs, namely DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI o1, o3-mini, and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Thinking. Each model was assessed using 5,888 multiple-choice ophthalmology exam questions from the MedMCQA dataset in zero-shot setting. Quantitative evaluation included accuracy, Macro-F1, and five text-generation metrics (ROUGE-L, METEOR, BERTScore, BARTScore, and AlignScore), computed against ground-truth reasonings. Average inference time was recorded for a subset of 100 randomly selected questions. Additionally, two board-certified ophthalmologists qualitatively assessed clarity, completeness, and reasoning structure of responses to differential diagnosis questions.O1 (0.902) and DeepSeek-R1 (0.888) achieved the highest accuracy, with o1 also leading in Macro-F1 (0.900). The performance of models across the text-generation metrics varied: O3-mini excelled in ROUGE-L (0.151), o1 in METEOR (0.232), DeepSeek-R1 and o3-mini tied for BERTScore (0.673), DeepSeek-R1 (-4.105) and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Thinking (-4.127) performed best in BARTScore, while o3-mini (0.181) and o1 (0.176) led AlignScore. Inference time across the models varied, with DeepSeek-R1 being slowest (40.4 seconds) and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Thinking fastest (6.7 seconds). Qualitative evaluation revealed that DeepSeek-R1 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Thinking tended to provide detailed and comprehensive intermediate reasoning, whereas o1 and o3-mini displayed concise and summarized justifications.

Related papers

• NovGauge: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Diagnosing LLMs' Capability in Paper Novelty Assessment [54.4265627247104]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in peer review at major AI conferences.<n>Existing benchmarks assess novelty as a single holistic score.<n>We present NovGauge, a human-anchored benchmark for fine-grained novelty assessment diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-10T08:34:56Z)
• PanCanBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Pancreatic Oncology [48.732366302949515]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved expert-level performance on standardized examinations, yet multiple-choice accuracy poorly reflects real-world clinical utility and safety.<n>We developed a human-in-the-loop pipeline to create expert rubrics for de-identified patient questions.<n>We evaluated 22 proprietary and open-source LLMs using an LLM-as-a-judge framework, measuring clinical completeness, factual accuracy, and web-search integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T00:50:39Z)
• Explainable Admission-Level Predictive Modeling for Prolonged Hospital Stay in Elderly Populations: Challenges in Low- and Middle-Income Countries [65.4286079244589]
  Prolonged length of stay (pLoS) is a significant factor associated with the risk of adverse in-hospital events.<n>We develop and explain a predictive model for pLos using admission-level patient and hospital administrative data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T23:35:24Z)
• Automated Identification of Incidentalomas Requiring Follow-Up: A Multi-Anatomy Evaluation of LLM-Based and Supervised Approaches [5.958100741754613]
  We evaluated large language models (LLMs) against supervised baselines for fine-grained, lesion-level detection of incidentalomas.<n>We introduced a novel inference strategy using lesion-tagged inputs and anatomy-aware prompting to ground model reasoning.<n>The anatomy-informed GPT-OSS-20b model achieved the highest performance, yielding an incidentaloma-positive macro-F1 of 0.79.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T08:49:57Z)
• RefineBench: Evaluating Refinement Capability of Language Models via Checklists [71.02281792867531]
  We evaluate two refinement modes: guided refinement and self-refinement.<n>In guided refinement, both proprietary LMs and large open-weight LMs can leverage targeted feedback to refine responses to near-perfect levels within five turns.<n>These findings suggest that frontier LMs require breakthroughs to self-refine their incorrect responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T07:20:52Z)
• BEnchmarking LLMs for Ophthalmology (BELO) for Ophthalmological Knowledge and Reasoning [4.765373980518581]
  BELO is an evaluation benchmark for ophthalmology-related clinical accuracy and reasoning quality.<n>It consists of 900 high-quality, expert-reviewed questions aggregated from five sources.<n>A public leaderboard has been established to promote transparent evaluation and reporting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T15:27:32Z)
• ReasonMed: A 370K Multi-Agent Generated Dataset for Advancing Medical Reasoning [44.96018028534255]
  ReasonMed is the largest medical reasoning dataset, comprising 370k high-quality examples distilled from 1.7 million initial reasoning paths.<n>We train ReasonMed-7B, which sets a new benchmark for sub-10B models, outperforming the prior best by 4.17% and even exceeding LLaMA3.1-70B on PubMedQA by 4.60%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T08:36:55Z)
• MedHELM: Holistic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Medical Tasks [47.486705282473984]
  Large language models (LLMs) achieve near-perfect scores on medical exams.<n>These evaluations inadequately reflect complexity and diversity of real-world clinical practice.<n>We introduce MedHELM, an evaluation framework for assessing LLM performance for medical tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T22:55:49Z)
• Predicting Length of Stay in Neurological ICU Patients Using Classical Machine Learning and Neural Network Models: A Benchmark Study on MIMIC-IV [49.1574468325115]
  This study explores multiple ML approaches for predicting LOS in ICU specifically for the patients with neurological diseases based on the MIMIC-IV dataset.<n>The evaluated models include classic ML algorithms (K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, XGBoost and CatBoost) and Neural Networks (LSTM, BERT and Temporal Fusion Transformer)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T14:06:42Z)
• Can Reasoning LLMs Enhance Clinical Document Classification? [7.026393789313748]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising improvements in accuracy and efficiency for this task.<n>This study evaluates the performance and consistency of eight LLMs; four reasoning (Qwen QWQ, Deepseek Reasoner, GPT o3 Mini, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking) and four non-reasoning (Llama 3.3, GPT 4o Mini, Gemini 2.0 Flash, Deepseek Chat)<n>Results showed that reasoning models outperformed non-reasoning models in accuracy (71% vs 68%) and F1 score (67% vs 60%)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T18:00:27Z)
• Multimodal Human-AI Synergy for Medical Imaging Quality Control: A Hybrid Intelligence Framework with Adaptive Dataset Curation and Closed-Loop Evaluation [16.19033330311087]
  We evaluate large language models (LLMs) in image quality assessment and report standardization.<n> Gemini 2.0-Flash achieved a Macro F1 score of 90 in CXR tasks, demonstrating strong generalization but limited fine-grained performance.<n>DeepSeek-R1 excelled in CT report auditing with a 62.23% recall rate, outperforming other models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T08:16:18Z)
• Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases [48.87360916431396]
  We introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references.<n>We propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey.<n>Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T18:35:39Z)
• Benchmarking Reasoning Robustness in Large Language Models [76.79744000300363]
  We find significant performance degradation on novel or incomplete data.<n>These findings highlight the reliance on recall over rigorous logical inference.<n>This paper introduces a novel benchmark, termed as Math-RoB, that exploits hallucinations triggered by missing information to expose reasoning gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T15:36:06Z)
• DeepSeek-R1 Outperforms Gemini 2.0 Pro, OpenAI o1, and o3-mini in Bilingual Complex Ophthalmology Reasoning [4.050281368901217]
  DeepSeek-R1 and three other recently released large ophthalmology reasoning models (LLMs) were evaluated.<n>DeepSeek-R1 achieved the highest accuracy across five topics in both Chinese English and Chinese MCQs.<n> Reasoning ability was evaluated through analyzing reasoning logic and the causes of reasoning error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T08:08:53Z)
• DocPuzzle: A Process-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Realistic Long-Context Reasoning Capabilities [39.68147391225923]
  We present DocPuzzle, a rigorously constructed benchmark for evaluating long-context reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) This benchmark comprises 100 expert-level QA problems requiring multi-step reasoning over long real-world documents. We introduce an innovative evaluation framework that mitigates guessing bias through checklist-guided process analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T03:29:53Z)
• Can OpenAI o1 Reason Well in Ophthalmology? A 6,990-Question Head-to-Head Evaluation Study [6.883286555555795]
  This study evaluated OpenAI o1 and five LLMs using 6,990 ophthalmological questions from MedMCQA.<n>O1 achieved the highest accuracy (0.88) and macro-F1 score but ranked third in reasoning capabilities based on text-generation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T02:40:01Z)
• CRTRE: Causal Rule Generation with Target Trial Emulation Framework [47.2836994469923]
  We introduce a novel method called causal rule generation with target trial emulation framework (CRTRE) CRTRE applies randomize trial design principles to estimate the causal effect of association rules. We then incorporate such association rules for the downstream applications such as prediction of disease onsets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-10T02:40:06Z)
• Language Enhanced Model for Eye (LEME): An Open-Source Ophthalmology-Specific Large Language Model [25.384237687766024]
  We introduce an open-source, specialized LLM for ophthalmology, termed Language Enhanced Model for Eye (LEME) LEME was initially pre-trained on the Llama2 70B framework and further fine-tuned with a corpus of 127,000 non-copyrighted training instances. We benchmarked LEME against eight other LLMs, namely, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, three Llama2 models (7B, 13B, 70B), PMC-LLAMA 13B, Meditron 70B, and EYE-Llama.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T02:43:54Z)
• AXIAL: Attention-based eXplainability for Interpretable Alzheimer's Localized Diagnosis using 2D CNNs on 3D MRI brain scans [43.06293430764841]
  This study presents an innovative method for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis using 3D MRI designed to enhance the explainability of model decisions. Our approach adopts a soft attention mechanism, enabling 2D CNNs to extract volumetric representations. With voxel-level precision, our method identified which specific areas are being paid attention to, identifying these predominant brain regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T16:44:00Z)
• Towards a Holistic Framework for Multimodal Large Language Models in Three-dimensional Brain CT Report Generation [42.06416052431378]
  2D radiology captioning is incompetent to reflect the real-world diagnostic challenge in the volumetric 3D anatomy. We collected an 18,885 text-scan pairs 3D-BrainCT dataset and applied clinical visual instruction tuning to train BrainGPT models to generate radiology-adherent 3D brain CT reports. Our work embodies a holistic framework that showcased the first-hand experience of curating a 3D brain CT dataset, fine-tuning anatomy-sensible language models, and proposing robust radiology evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T12:58:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.