BenchQC -- Scalable and modular benchmarking of industrial quantum computing applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11204v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 14:05:11 GMT
• Title: BenchQC -- Scalable and modular benchmarking of industrial quantum computing applications
• Abstract summary: BenchQC promotes an application-centric perspective for benchmarking real-world quantum applications.<n>We aim to uncover meaningful trends, provide systematic guidance on quantum utility, and distinguish promising research directions from less viable approaches.
• Score: 26.629709879735532
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We present BenchQC, a research project funded by the state of Bavaria, which promotes an application-centric perspective for benchmarking real-world quantum applications. Diverse use cases from industry consortium members are the starting point of a benchmarking workflow, that builds on the open-source platform QUARK, encompassing the full quantum software stack from the hardware provider interface to the application layer. By identifying and evaluating key metrics across the entire pipeline, we aim to uncover meaningful trends, provide systematic guidance on quantum utility, and distinguish promising research directions from less viable approaches. Ultimately, this initiative contributes to the broader effort of establishing reliable benchmarking standards that drive the transition from experimental demonstrations to practical quantum advantage.

Related papers

• Benchmarking Quantum Software Testing with Scalable Quantum Programs [9.3695909584334]
  We present Qolumbina, a benchmark infrastructure for controlled QST experiments on scalable quantum programs.<n>Qlumbina curates 40 programs from open-source repositories, turns them into test-ready subjects.<n>We also propose QST-oriented criteria to characterize quantum programs along functionality, output behavior, development complexity, and quantum-specific execution complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-02T10:56:35Z)
• AQER: a scalable and efficient data loader for digital quantum computers [62.40228216126285]
  We develop AQER, a scalable AQL method that constructs the loading circuit by systematically reducing entanglement in target states.<n>We conduct systematic experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of AQER, using synthetic datasets, classical image and language datasets, and a quantum many-body state datasets with up to 50 qubits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T14:39:42Z)
• The EU Quantum Flagship's Key Performance Indicators for Quantum Computing [0.12099984425168675]
  We present a suite of scalable quantum computing benchmarks developed as key performance indicators (KPIs) within the EU Quantum Flagship.<n>These benchmarks are designed to assess holistic system performance rather than isolated components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T18:30:06Z)
• QEF: Reproducible and Exploratory Quantum Software Experiments [1.1683938179815823]
  Quantum Experiment Framework (QEF) is designed to support the systematic, hypothesis-driven study of quantum algorithms.<n>QEF captures all key aspects of quantum software and algorithm experiments through a concise specification.<n>QEF supports parameter reuse to improve overall experiment runtimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-06T17:17:55Z)
• Quantum Machine Learning methods for Fourier-based distribution estimation with application in option pricing [42.79174867716636]
  We introduce two hybrid classical-quantum methods to address the option pricing problem.<n>We show that the proposed methods achieve remarkable accuracy, becoming a competitive quantum alternative for derivatives valuation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T11:43:08Z)
• Quantum Executor: A Unified Interface for Quantum Computing [46.36953285198747]
  Quantum Executor is a backend-agnostic execution engine designed to orchestrate quantum experiments across heterogeneous platforms.<n>Key features include support for asynchronous and distributed execution, customizable execution strategies and a unified API for managing quantum experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T09:55:32Z)
• What is a good use case for quantum computers? [0.0]
  We introduce a four-step framework for assessing quantum computing applications.<n>Applying this framework to cases like NMR reveals both significant opportunities and key barriers on the path to practical advantage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T12:57:22Z)
• A Framework for Integrating Quantum Simulation and High Performance Computing [0.0]
  We describe a framework to help streamline access to quantum simulation software running on HPC resources. This includes an interface for circuit-based quantum computing tasks, as well as the necessary resource management infrastructure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T11:48:14Z)
• QuAS: Quantum Application Score for benchmarking the utility of quantum computers [0.0]
  This paper presents a revised holistic scoring method called the Quantum Application Score (QuAS) We discuss how to integrate both and thereby obtain an application-level metric that better quantifies the practical utility of quantum computers. We evaluate the new metric on different hardware platforms such as D-Wave and IBM as well as quantum simulators of Quantum Inspire and Rigetti.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T09:39:58Z)
• HamilToniQ: An Open-Source Benchmark Toolkit for Quantum Computers [4.795321943127061]
  HamilToniQ is an open-source, application-oriented benchmarking toolkit for the comprehensive evaluation of Quantum Processing Units (QPUs) It incorporates a methodological framework assessing QPU types, topologies, and multi-QPU systems. HamilToniQ's standardized score, H-Score, quantifies the fidelity and reliability of QPUs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T08:27:14Z)
• Quantum Computing Enhanced Service Ecosystem for Simulation in Manufacturing [56.61654656648898]
  We propose a framework for a quantum computing-enhanced service ecosystem for simulation in manufacturing. We analyse two high-value use cases with the aim of a quantitative evaluation of these new computing paradigms for industrially-relevant settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T11:04:14Z)
• Assessing requirements to scale to practical quantum advantage [56.22441723982983]
  We develop a framework for quantum resource estimation, abstracting the layers of the stack, to estimate resources required for large-scale quantum applications. We assess three scaled quantum applications and find that hundreds of thousands to millions of physical qubits are needed to achieve practical quantum advantage. A goal of our work is to accelerate progress towards practical quantum advantage by enabling the broader community to explore design choices across the stack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T18:50:27Z)
• QUARK: A Framework for Quantum Computing Application Benchmarking [0.0]
  We propose an application-centric benchmark method and the QUARK framework to foster the investigation and creation of application benchmarks for QC. This paper makes a case for application-level benchmarks and provides an in-depth "pen and paper" benchmark formulation of two reference problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T09:41:24Z)
• Generalization Metrics for Practical Quantum Advantage in Generative Models [68.8204255655161]
  Generative modeling is a widely accepted natural use case for quantum computers. We construct a simple and unambiguous approach to probe practical quantum advantage for generative modeling by measuring the algorithm's generalization performance. Our simulation results show that our quantum-inspired models have up to a $68 times$ enhancement in generating unseen unique and valid samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T16:35:35Z)
• Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks for Quantum Computing [0.0]
  benchmarking suite is designed to be readily accessible to a broad audience of users. Our methodology is constructed to anticipate advances in quantum computing hardware that are likely to emerge in the next five years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T01:45:06Z)
• Realization of arbitrary doubly-controlled quantum phase gates [62.997667081978825]
  We introduce a high-fidelity gate set inspired by a proposal for near-term quantum advantage in optimization problems. By orchestrating coherent, multi-level control over three transmon qutrits, we synthesize a family of deterministic, continuous-angle quantum phase gates acting in the natural three-qubit computational basis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-03T17:49:09Z)
• Quantum Machine Learning with SQUID [64.53556573827525]
  We present the Scaled QUantum IDentifier (SQUID), an open-source framework for exploring hybrid Quantum-Classical algorithms for classification problems. We provide examples of using SQUID in a standard binary classification problem from the popular MNIST dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-30T21:34:11Z)
• Nearest Centroid Classification on a Trapped Ion Quantum Computer [57.5195654107363]
  We design a quantum Nearest Centroid classifier, using techniques for efficiently loading classical data into quantum states and performing distance estimations. We experimentally demonstrate it on a 11-qubit trapped-ion quantum machine, matching the accuracy of classical nearest centroid classifiers for the MNIST handwritten digits dataset and achieving up to 100% accuracy for 8-dimensional synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T01:10:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.