Counterfactual Fairness Evaluation of Machine Learning Models on Educational Datasets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11504v2
• Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 07:34:59 GMT
• Title: Counterfactual Fairness Evaluation of Machine Learning Models on Educational Datasets
• Authors: Woojin Kim, Hyeoncheol Kim,
• Abstract summary: Group fairness is widely explored in education, but works on individual fairness in a causal context are understudied.<n>This paper explores the notion of counterfactual fairness for educational data by conducting counterfactual fairness analysis of machine learning models.<n>We demonstrate that counterfactual fairness provides meaningful insight into the causality of sensitive attributes and causal-based individual fairness in education.
• Score: 4.7223923266180785
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As machine learning models are increasingly used in educational settings, from detecting at-risk students to predicting student performance, algorithmic bias and its potential impacts on students raise critical concerns about algorithmic fairness. Although group fairness is widely explored in education, works on individual fairness in a causal context are understudied, especially on counterfactual fairness. This paper explores the notion of counterfactual fairness for educational data by conducting counterfactual fairness analysis of machine learning models on benchmark educational datasets. We demonstrate that counterfactual fairness provides meaningful insight into the causality of sensitive attributes and causal-based individual fairness in education.

Related papers

• Targeted Learning for Data Fairness [52.59573714151884]
  We expand fairness inference by evaluating fairness in the data generating process itself. We derive estimators demographic parity, equal opportunity, and conditional mutual information. To validate our approach, we perform several simulations and apply our estimators to real data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T18:51:28Z)
• Fairness Evaluation with Item Response Theory [10.871079276188649]
  This paper proposes a novel Fair-IRT framework to evaluate fairness in Machine Learning (ML) models. Detailed explanations for item characteristic curves (ICCs) are provided for particular individuals. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this framework as a fairness evaluation tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T22:25:20Z)
• Rethinking Fair Representation Learning for Performance-Sensitive Tasks [19.40265690963578]
  We use causal reasoning to define and formalise different sources of dataset bias.<n>We run experiments across a range of medical modalities to examine the performance of fair representation learning under distribution shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T11:01:16Z)
• Toward Fairer Face Recognition Datasets [69.04239222633795]
  Face recognition and verification are computer vision tasks whose performance has progressed with the introduction of deep representations. Ethical, legal, and technical challenges due to the sensitive character of face data and biases in real training datasets hinder their development. We promote fairness by introducing a demographic attributes balancing mechanism in generated training datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T12:33:21Z)
• Learning for Counterfactual Fairness from Observational Data [62.43249746968616]
  Fairness-aware machine learning aims to eliminate biases of learning models against certain subgroups described by certain protected (sensitive) attributes such as race, gender, and age. A prerequisite for existing methods to achieve counterfactual fairness is the prior human knowledge of the causal model for the data. In this work, we address the problem of counterfactually fair prediction from observational data without given causal models by proposing a novel framework CLAIRE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T04:08:29Z)
• DualFair: Fair Representation Learning at Both Group and Individual Levels via Contrastive Self-supervision [73.80009454050858]
  This work presents a self-supervised model, called DualFair, that can debias sensitive attributes like gender and race from learned representations. Our model jointly optimize for two fairness criteria - group fairness and counterfactual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T07:13:54Z)
• Fairness Evaluation in Text Classification: Machine Learning Practitioner Perspectives of Individual and Group Fairness [34.071324739205096]
  We run a study with Machine Learning practitioners to understand the strategies used to evaluate models. We discover fairness assessment strategies involving personal experiences or how users form groups of identity tokens to test model fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T17:12:49Z)
• A review of clustering models in educational data science towards fairness-aware learning [14.051419173519308]
  This chapter comprehensively surveys clustering models and their fairness in educational activities. We especially focus on investigating the fair clustering models applied in educational activities. These models are believed to be practical tools for analyzing students' data and ensuring fairness in EDS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T15:18:51Z)
• Fair Inference for Discrete Latent Variable Models [12.558187319452657]
  Machine learning models, trained on data without due care, often exhibit unfair and discriminatory behavior against certain populations. We develop a fair variational inference technique for the discrete latent variables, which is accomplished by including a fairness penalty on the variational distribution. To demonstrate the generality of our approach and its potential for real-world impact, we then develop a special-purpose graphical model for criminal justice risk assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T04:54:21Z)
• Fairness in Semi-supervised Learning: Unlabeled Data Help to Reduce Discrimination [53.3082498402884]
  A growing specter in the rise of machine learning is whether the decisions made by machine learning models are fair. We present a framework of fair semi-supervised learning in the pre-processing phase, including pseudo labeling to predict labels for unlabeled data. A theoretical decomposition analysis of bias, variance and noise highlights the different sources of discrimination and the impact they have on fairness in semi-supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-25T05:48:56Z)
• Fairness Constraints in Semi-supervised Learning [56.48626493765908]
  We develop a framework for fair semi-supervised learning, which is formulated as an optimization problem. We theoretically analyze the source of discrimination in semi-supervised learning via bias, variance and noise decomposition. Our method is able to achieve fair semi-supervised learning, and reach a better trade-off between accuracy and fairness than fair supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T04:25:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.