A Library of LLM Intrinsics for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11704v2
• Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 02:10:42 GMT
• Title: A Library of LLM Intrinsics for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
• Abstract summary: This article describes the intended usage, training details, and evaluations for each intrinsic, as well as compositions of multiple intrinsics.<n>An intrinsic is a capability that can be invoked through a well-defined API that is reasonably stable and independent of how the LLM intrinsic itself is implemented.<n>The intrinsics in our library are released as LoRA adapters on HuggingFace, and through a software interface with clear structured input/output characteristics on top of vLLM as an inference platform.
• Score: 23.943062719367816
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the developer community for large language models (LLMs), there is not yet a clean pattern analogous to a software library, to support very large scale collaboration. Even for the commonplace use case of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), it is not currently possible to write a RAG application against a well-defined set of APIs that are agreed upon by different LLM providers. Inspired by the idea of compiler intrinsics, we propose some elements of such a concept through introducing a library of LLM Intrinsics for RAG. An LLM intrinsic is defined as a capability that can be invoked through a well-defined API that is reasonably stable and independent of how the LLM intrinsic itself is implemented. The intrinsics in our library are released as LoRA adapters on HuggingFace, and through a software interface with clear structured input/output characteristics on top of vLLM as an inference platform, accompanied in both places with documentation and code. This article describes the intended usage, training details, and evaluations for each intrinsic, as well as compositions of multiple intrinsics.

Related papers

• RealBench: A Repo-Level Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Software Development Practices [54.956760584923295]
  Researchers have made substantial progress using Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation.<n>However, developers typically write code based on structured designs or specifications rather than raw natural language descriptions.<n>This gap between existing benchmarks and real industry development practices means that current benchmark scores may not accurately reflect how much code generation can help automate development tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T15:35:54Z)
• The Fools are Certain; the Wise are Doubtful: Exploring LLM Confidence in Code Completion [4.215010577170175]
  We evaluate the confidence of Large Language Models (LLMs) when generating code by measuring code perplexity.<n>We find that strongly-typed languages exhibit lower perplexity than dynamically typed languages.<n> Perl appears universally high in perplexity, whereas Java appears low.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T06:51:13Z)
• On LLM-Assisted Generation of Smart Contracts from Business Processes [0.08192907805418582]
  Large language models (LLMs) have changed the reality of how software is produced.<n>We present an exploratory study to investigate the use of LLMs for generating smart contract code from business process descriptions.<n>Our results show that LLM performance falls short of the perfect reliability required for smart contract development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T20:39:45Z)
• LaRA: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Long-Context LLMs -- No Silver Bullet for LC or RAG Routing [70.35888047551643]
  We present LaRA, a novel benchmark specifically designed to rigorously compare RAG and LC LLMs. LaRA encompasses 2326 test cases across four practical QA task categories and three types of naturally occurring long texts. We find that the optimal choice between RAG and LC depends on a complex interplay of factors, including the model's parameter size, long-text capabilities, context length, task type, and the characteristics of the retrieved chunks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T08:04:22Z)
• Commit0: Library Generation from Scratch [77.38414688148006]
  Commit0 is a benchmark that challenges AI agents to write libraries from scratch. Agents are provided with a specification document outlining the library's API as well as a suite of interactive unit tests. Commit0 also offers an interactive environment where models receive static analysis and execution feedback on the code they generate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T18:11:30Z)
• Codellm-Devkit: A Framework for Contextualizing Code LLMs with Program Analysis Insights [9.414198519543564]
  We present codellm-devkit (hereafter, CLDK'), an open-source library that significantly simplifies the process of performing program analysis. CLDK offers developers an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it incredibly easy to provide rich program analysis context to code LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T20:05:59Z)
• Open-domain Implicit Format Control for Large Language Model Generation [52.83173553689678]
  We introduce a novel framework for controlled generation in large language models (LLMs) This study investigates LLMs' capabilities to follow open-domain, one-shot constraints and replicate the format of the example answers. We also develop a dataset collection methodology for supervised fine-tuning that enhances the open-domain format control of LLMs without degrading output quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T11:51:45Z)
• llmNER: (Zero|Few)-Shot Named Entity Recognition, Exploiting the Power of Large Language Models [1.1196013962698619]
  This paper presents llmNER, a Python library for implementing zero-shot and few-shot NER with large language models (LLMs) llmNER can compose prompts, query the model, and parse the completion returned by the LLM. We validated our software on two NER tasks to show the library's flexibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T22:01:59Z)
• If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agents [81.60906807941188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a combination of natural language and formal language (code) Code translates high-level goals into executable steps, featuring standard syntax, logical consistency, abstraction, and modularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T16:51:20Z)
• Making Large Language Models A Better Foundation For Dense Retrieval [19.38740248464456]
  Dense retrieval needs to learn discriminative text embeddings to represent the semantic relationship between query and document. It may benefit from the using of large language models (LLMs), given LLMs' strong capability on semantic understanding. We propose LLaRA (LLM adapted for dense RetrievAl), which works as a post-hoc adaptation of dense retrieval application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-24T15:10:35Z)
• ML-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models and Agents for Machine Learning Tasks on Repository-Level Code [76.84199699772903]
  ML-Bench is a benchmark rooted in real-world programming applications that leverage existing code repositories to perform tasks. To evaluate both Large Language Models (LLMs) and AI agents, two setups are employed: ML-LLM-Bench for assessing LLMs' text-to-code conversion within a predefined deployment environment, and ML-Agent-Bench for testing autonomous agents in an end-to-end task execution within a Linux sandbox environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T12:03:21Z)
• Evaluating In-Context Learning of Libraries for Code Generation [35.57902679044737]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a high degree of code generation and comprehension capability. Recent work has shown that large proprietary LLMs can learn novel library usage in-context from demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:37:25Z)
• LILO: Learning Interpretable Libraries by Compressing and Documenting Code [71.55208585024198]
  We introduce LILO, a neurosymbolic framework that iteratively synthesizes, compresses, and documents code. LILO combines LLM-guided program synthesis with recent algorithmic advances in automated from Stitch. We find that AutoDoc boosts performance by helping LILO's synthesizer to interpret and deploy learned abstractions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T17:55:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.