Reimagining Urban Science: Scaling Causal Inference with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12345v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 16:58:11 GMT
• Title: Reimagining Urban Science: Scaling Causal Inference with Large Language Models
• Authors: Yutong Xia, Ao Qu, Yunhan Zheng, Yihong Tang, Dingyi Zhuang, Yuxuan Liang, Cathy Wu, Roger Zimmermann, Jinhua Zhao,
• Abstract summary: This Perspective examines current urban causal research by analyzing that categorize research topics, data sources, and methodological approaches to identify structural gaps.<n>We introduce an AutoUrbanCI conceptual framework, composed of four distinct modular agents responsible for hypothesis generation, data engineering, experiment design and execution, and results interpretation with policy recommendations.<n>We propose evaluation criteria for rigor and transparency and reflect on implications for human-AI collaboration, equity, and accountability.
• Score: 29.65991531410286
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Urban causal research is essential for understanding the complex dynamics of cities and informing evidence-based policies. However, it is challenged by the inefficiency and bias of hypothesis generation, barriers to multimodal data complexity, and the methodological fragility of causal experimentation. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) present an opportunity to rethink how urban causal analysis is conducted. This Perspective examines current urban causal research by analyzing taxonomies that categorize research topics, data sources, and methodological approaches to identify structural gaps. We then introduce an LLM-driven conceptual framework, AutoUrbanCI, composed of four distinct modular agents responsible for hypothesis generation, data engineering, experiment design and execution, and results interpretation with policy recommendations. We propose evaluation criteria for rigor and transparency and reflect on implications for human-AI collaboration, equity, and accountability. We call for a new research agenda that embraces AI-augmented workflows not as replacements for human expertise but as tools to broaden participation, improve reproducibility, and unlock more inclusive forms of urban causal reasoning.

Related papers

• Causality for Natural Language Processing [17.681875945732042]
  Causal reasoning is a cornerstone of human intelligence and a critical capability for artificial systems. This thesis delves into various dimensions of causal reasoning and understanding in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-20T08:11:11Z)
• A Survey on Hypothesis Generation for Scientific Discovery in the Era of Large Language Models [0.9383505015433911]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked growing interest in their potential to enhance and automate hypothesis generation.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive survey of hypothesis generation with LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T20:44:33Z)
• Why Reasoning Matters? A Survey of Advancements in Multimodal Reasoning (v1) [66.51642638034822]
  Reasoning is central to human intelligence, enabling structured problem-solving across diverse tasks.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced their reasoning abilities in arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic domains.<n>This paper offers a concise yet insightful overview of reasoning techniques in both textual and multimodal LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T04:04:56Z)
• An LLM-based Delphi Study to Predict GenAI Evolution [0.6138671548064356]
  This study introduces a novel approach to qualitative forecasting by leveraging Large Language Models.<n>The methodology was applied to explore the future evolution of Generative Artificial Intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T14:31:25Z)
• Causality can systematically address the monsters under the bench(marks) [64.36592889550431]
  Benchmarks are plagued by various biases, artifacts, or leakage.<n>Models may behave unreliably due to poorly explored failure modes.<n> causality offers an ideal framework to systematically address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T17:01:37Z)
• Collaborative Imputation of Urban Time Series through Cross-city Meta-learning [54.438991949772145]
  We propose a novel collaborative imputation paradigm leveraging meta-learned implicit neural representations (INRs)<n>We then introduce a cross-city collaborative learning scheme through model-agnostic meta learning.<n>Experiments on a diverse urban dataset from 20 global cities demonstrate our model's superior imputation performance and generalizability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T07:12:40Z)
• Discovery of the Hidden World with Large Language Models [95.58823685009727]
  This paper presents Causal representatiOn AssistanT (COAT) that introduces large language models (LLMs) to bridge the gap. LLMs are trained on massive observations of the world and have demonstrated great capability in extracting key information from unstructured data. COAT also adopts CDs to find causal relations among the identified variables as well as to provide feedback to LLMs to iteratively refine the proposed factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T12:18:54Z)
• Machine-assisted quantitizing designs: augmenting humanities and social sciences with artificial intelligence [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to present an unprecedented opportunity to scale up data analytics in the humanities and social sciences. We build on mixed methods quantitizing and converting design principles, and feature analysis from linguistics, to transparently integrate human expertise and machine scalability. The approach is discussed and demonstrated in over a dozen LLM-assisted case studies, covering 9 diverse languages, multiple disciplines and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T14:21:50Z)
• Towards CausalGPT: A Multi-Agent Approach for Faithful Knowledge Reasoning via Promoting Causal Consistency in LLMs [55.66353783572259]
  Causal-Consistency Chain-of-Thought harnesses multi-agent collaboration to bolster the faithfulness and causality of foundation models.<n>Our framework demonstrates significant superiority over state-of-the-art methods through extensive and comprehensive evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T04:59:21Z)
• Learning a Structural Causal Model for Intuition Reasoning in Conversation [20.243323155177766]
  Reasoning, a crucial aspect of NLP research, has not been adequately addressed by prevailing models. We develop a conversation cognitive model ( CCM) that explains how each utterance receives and activates channels of information. By leveraging variational inference, it explores substitutes for implicit causes, addresses the issue of their unobservability, and reconstructs the causal representations of utterances through the evidence lower bounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T13:54:09Z)
• Causal Reasoning Meets Visual Representation Learning: A Prospective Study [117.08431221482638]
  Lack of interpretability, robustness, and out-of-distribution generalization are becoming the challenges of the existing visual models. Inspired by the strong inference ability of human-level agents, recent years have witnessed great effort in developing causal reasoning paradigms. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of this emerging field, attract attention, encourage discussions, bring to the forefront the urgency of developing novel causal reasoning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T02:22:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.