Readable Twins of Unreadable Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13150v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:55:34 GMT
• Title: Readable Twins of Unreadable Models
• Authors: Krzysztof Pancerz, Piotr Kulicki, Michał Kalisz, Andrzej Burda, Maciej Stanisławski, Jaromir Sarzyński,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the idea of creating readable twins for unreadable deep learning models.<n>The proposed approach is illustrated with an example of a deep learning classification model for image recognition of handwritten digits.
• Score: 0.07916635054977067
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Creating responsible artificial intelligence (AI) systems is an important issue in contemporary research and development of works on AI. One of the characteristics of responsible AI systems is their explainability. In the paper, we are interested in explainable deep learning (XDL) systems. On the basis of the creation of digital twins of physical objects, we introduce the idea of creating readable twins (in the form of imprecise information flow models) for unreadable deep learning models. The complete procedure for switching from the deep learning model (DLM) to the imprecise information flow model (IIFM) is presented. The proposed approach is illustrated with an example of a deep learning classification model for image recognition of handwritten digits from the MNIST data set.

Related papers

• Fill in the blanks: Rethinking Interpretability in vision [0.0]
  We re-think vision-model explainability from a novel perspective, to probe the general input structure that a model has learnt during its training. Experiments on standard vision datasets and pre-trained models reveal consistent patterns, and could be intergrated as an additional model-agnostic explainability tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T15:31:06Z)
• Identifiable Causal Representation Learning: Unsupervised, Multi-View, and Multi-Environment [10.814585613336778]
  Causal representation learning aims to combine the core strengths of machine learning and causality. This thesis investigates what is possible for CRL without direct supervision, and thus contributes to its theoretical foundations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T09:14:40Z)
• AI-Generated Images as Data Source: The Dawn of Synthetic Era [61.879821573066216]
  generative AI has unlocked the potential to create synthetic images that closely resemble real-world photographs. This paper explores the innovative concept of harnessing these AI-generated images as new data sources. In contrast to real data, AI-generated data exhibit remarkable advantages, including unmatched abundance and scalability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T06:55:19Z)
• Representing Timed Automata and Timing Anomalies of Cyber-Physical Production Systems in Knowledge Graphs [51.98400002538092]
  This paper aims to improve model-based anomaly detection in CPPS by combining the learned timed automaton with a formal knowledge graph about the system. Both the model and the detected anomalies are described in the knowledge graph in order to allow operators an easier interpretation of the model and the detected anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T15:25:57Z)
• Explaining Explainability: Towards Deeper Actionable Insights into Deep Learning through Second-order Explainability [70.60433013657693]
  Second-order explainable AI (SOXAI) was recently proposed to extend explainable AI (XAI) from the instance level to the dataset level. We demonstrate for the first time, via example classification and segmentation cases, that eliminating irrelevant concepts from the training set based on actionable insights from SOXAI can enhance a model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T23:24:01Z)
• The KITMUS Test: Evaluating Knowledge Integration from Multiple Sources in Natural Language Understanding Systems [87.3207729953778]
  We evaluate state-of-the-art coreference resolution models on our dataset. Several models struggle to reason on-the-fly over knowledge observed both at pretrain time and at inference time. Still, even the best performing models seem to have difficulties with reliably integrating knowledge presented only at inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T23:26:54Z)
• Perception Visualization: Seeing Through the Eyes of a DNN [5.9557391359320375]
  We develop a new form of explanation that is radically different in nature from current explanation methods, such as Grad-CAM. Perception visualization provides a visual representation of what the DNN perceives in the input image by depicting what visual patterns the latent representation corresponds to. Results of our user study demonstrate that humans can better understand and predict the system's decisions when perception visualizations are available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-21T07:18:55Z)
• Neurosymbolic hybrid approach to driver collision warning [64.02492460600905]
  There are two main algorithmic approaches to autonomous driving systems. Deep learning alone has achieved state-of-the-art results in many areas. But sometimes it can be very difficult to debug if the deep learning model doesn't work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-28T20:29:50Z)
• Algebraic Learning: Towards Interpretable Information Modeling [0.0]
  This thesis addresses the issue of interpretability in general information modeling and endeavors to ease the problem from two scopes. Firstly, a problem-oriented perspective is applied to incorporate knowledge into modeling practice, where interesting mathematical properties emerge naturally. Secondly, given a trained model, various methods could be applied to extract further insights about the underlying system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-13T15:53:39Z)
• Deep Learning Reproducibility and Explainable AI (XAI) [9.13755431537592]
  The nondeterminism of Deep Learning (DL) training algorithms and its influence on the explainability of neural network (NN) models are investigated. To discuss the issue, two convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been trained and their results compared.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-23T12:06:20Z)
• Explainability in Deep Reinforcement Learning [68.8204255655161]
  We review recent works in the direction to attain Explainable Reinforcement Learning (XRL) In critical situations where it is essential to justify and explain the agent's behaviour, better explainability and interpretability of RL models could help gain scientific insight on the inner workings of what is still considered a black box.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T10:11:42Z)
• Explainable Active Learning (XAL): An Empirical Study of How Local Explanations Impact Annotator Experience [76.9910678786031]
  We propose a novel paradigm of explainable active learning (XAL), by introducing techniques from the recently surging field of explainable AI (XAI) into an Active Learning setting. Our study shows benefits of AI explanation as interfaces for machine teaching--supporting trust calibration and enabling rich forms of teaching feedback, and potential drawbacks--anchoring effect with the model judgment and cognitive workload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:52:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.