AI as a deliberative partner fosters intercultural empathy for Americans but fails for Latin American participants

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13887v1
• Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 17:15:01 GMT
• Title: AI as a deliberative partner fosters intercultural empathy for Americans but fails for Latin American participants
• Authors: Isabel Villanueva, Tara Bobinac, Binwei Yao, Junjie Hu, Kaiping Chen,
• Abstract summary: We examined how different types of AI interaction, i.e. deliberative versus non-deliberative and culturally aligned versus non-aligned, affect intercultural empathy.<n>Results show that deliberative conversations increased intercultural empathy among American participants but not Latin American participants.<n>Despite explicit prompting and instruction to represent cultural perspectives in participants' native languages, AI systems still exhibit significant disparities in cultural representation.
• Score: 4.641694322213005
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite the growing integration of AI chatbots as conversational agents in public discourse, empirical evidence regarding their capacity to foster intercultural empathy remains limited. Using a randomized dialogue experiment, we examined how different types of AI chatbot interaction, i.e., deliberative versus non-deliberative and culturally aligned versus non-aligned, affect intercultural empathy across cultural groups. Results show that deliberative conversations increased intercultural empathy among American participants but not Latin American participants, who perceived AI responses as culturally inaccurate and failing to represent their cultural contexts and perspectives authentically. Real-time interaction analyses reveal that these differences stem from cultural knowledge gaps inherent in Large Language Models. Despite explicit prompting and instruction to represent cultural perspectives in participants' native languages, AI systems still exhibit significant disparities in cultural representation. This highlights the importance of designing AI systems capable of culturally authentic engagement in deliberative conversations. Our study contributes to deliberation theory and AI alignment research by underscoring AI's role in intercultural dialogue and the persistent challenge of representational asymmetry in democratic discourse.

Related papers

• Mind the Gesture: Evaluating AI Sensitivity to Culturally Offensive Non-Verbal Gestures [67.89565097372751]
  Gestures are an integral part of non-verbal communication, with meanings that vary across cultures.<n>As AI systems become more integrated into global applications, ensuring they do not inadvertently perpetuate cultural offenses is critical.<n>We introduce Multi-Cultural Set of Inappropriate Gestures and Nonverbal Signs (MC-SIGNS), a dataset of 288 gesture-country pairs annotated for offensiveness, cultural significance, and contextual factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T23:10:08Z)
• CultureVLM: Characterizing and Improving Cultural Understanding of Vision-Language Models for over 100 Countries [63.00147630084146]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced human-AI interaction but struggle with cultural understanding.<n>CultureVerse is a large-scale multimodal benchmark covering 19, 682 cultural concepts, 188 countries/regions, 15 cultural concepts, and 3 question types.<n>We propose CultureVLM, a series of VLMs fine-tuned on our dataset to achieve significant performance improvement in cultural understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T14:42:37Z)
• The Honorific Effect: Exploring the Impact of Japanese Linguistic Formalities on AI-Generated Physics Explanations [0.0]
  This study investigates the influence of Japanese honorifics on the responses of large language models (LLMs) when explaining the law of conservation of momentum. We analyzed the outputs of six state-of-the-art AI models, including variations of ChatGPT, Coral, and Gemini, using 14 different honorific forms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T11:31:00Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
  We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks. We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts. We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z)
• CIVICS: Building a Dataset for Examining Culturally-Informed Values in Large Language Models [59.22460740026037]
  "CIVICS: Culturally-Informed & Values-Inclusive Corpus for Societal impacts" dataset is designed to evaluate the social and cultural variation of Large Language Models (LLMs) We create a hand-crafted, multilingual dataset of value-laden prompts which address specific socially sensitive topics, including LGBTQI rights, social welfare, immigration, disability rights, and surrogacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T20:19:10Z)
• How Culture Shapes What People Want From AI [0.0]
  There is an urgent need to incorporate the perspectives of culturally diverse groups into AI developments. We present a novel conceptual framework for research that aims to expand, reimagine, and reground mainstream visions of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T07:08:19Z)
• Massively Multi-Cultural Knowledge Acquisition & LM Benchmarking [48.21982147529661]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for massively multicultural knowledge acquisition. Our method strategically navigates from densely informative Wikipedia documents on cultural topics to an extensive network of linked pages. Our work marks an important step towards deeper understanding and bridging the gaps of cultural disparities in AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:16:54Z)
• Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models [0.9374652839580183]
  We conduct a disaggregated evaluation of cultural bias for five widely used large language models. All models exhibit cultural values resembling English-speaking and Protestant European countries. We suggest using cultural prompting and ongoing evaluation to reduce cultural bias in the output of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T16:45:56Z)
• Not All Countries Celebrate Thanksgiving: On the Cultural Dominance in Large Language Models [89.94270049334479]
  This paper identifies a cultural dominance issue within large language models (LLMs) LLMs often provide inappropriate English-culture-related answers that are not relevant to the expected culture when users ask in non-English languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T05:38:23Z)
• Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Study [9.919972416590124]
  ChatGPT has garnered widespread recognition for its exceptional ability to generate human-like responses in dialogue. We investigate the underlying cultural background of ChatGPT by analyzing its responses to questions designed to quantify human cultural differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T15:43:39Z)
• Cultural Incongruencies in Artificial Intelligence [5.817158625734485]
  We describe a set of cultural dependencies and incongruencies in the context of AI-based language and vision technologies. Problems arise when these technologies interact with globally diverse societies and cultures, with different values and interpretive practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T18:45:02Z)
• An Analytics of Culture: Modeling Subjectivity, Scalability, Contextuality, and Temporality [13.638494941763637]
  There is a bidirectional relationship between culture and AI; AI models are increasingly used to analyse culture, thereby shaping our understanding of culture. On the other hand, the models are trained on collections of cultural artifacts thereby implicitly, and not always correctly, encoding expressions of culture. This creates a tension that both limits the use of AI for analysing culture and leads to problems in AI with respect to cultural complex issues such as bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T15:42:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.