Aerial Image Classification in Scarce and Unconstrained Environments via Conformal Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17655v1
• Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:25:37 GMT
• Title: Aerial Image Classification in Scarce and Unconstrained Environments via Conformal Prediction
• Authors: Farhad Pourkamali-Anaraki,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a comprehensive empirical analysis of conformal prediction methods on a challenging aerial image dataset.<n>Our study addresses the complexities of data-scarce and highly variable real-world settings.<n>Our findings demonstrate that even with relatively small labeled samples and simple nonconformity scores, conformal prediction can yield valuable uncertainty estimates.
• Score: 2.77390041716769
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive empirical analysis of conformal prediction methods on a challenging aerial image dataset featuring diverse events in unconstrained environments. Conformal prediction is a powerful post-hoc technique that takes the output of any classifier and transforms it into a set of likely labels, providing a statistical guarantee on the coverage of the true label. Unlike evaluations on standard benchmarks, our study addresses the complexities of data-scarce and highly variable real-world settings. We investigate the effectiveness of leveraging pretrained models (MobileNet, DenseNet, and ResNet), fine-tuned with limited labeled data, to generate informative prediction sets. To further evaluate the impact of calibration, we consider two parallel pipelines (with and without temperature scaling) and assess performance using two key metrics: empirical coverage and average prediction set size. This setup allows us to systematically examine how calibration choices influence the trade-off between reliability and efficiency. Our findings demonstrate that even with relatively small labeled samples and simple nonconformity scores, conformal prediction can yield valuable uncertainty estimates for complex tasks. Moreover, our analysis reveals that while temperature scaling is often employed for calibration, it does not consistently lead to smaller prediction sets, underscoring the importance of careful consideration in its application. Furthermore, our results highlight the significant potential of model compression techniques within the conformal prediction pipeline for deployment in resource-constrained environments. Based on our observations, we advocate for future research to delve into the impact of noisy or ambiguous labels on conformal prediction performance and to explore effective model reduction strategies.

Related papers

• Noise-Adaptive Conformal Classification with Marginal Coverage [53.74125453366155]
  We introduce an adaptive conformal inference method capable of efficiently handling deviations from exchangeability caused by random label noise.<n>We validate our method through extensive numerical experiments demonstrating its effectiveness on synthetic and real data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T23:55:23Z)
• A Conformal Approach to Feature-based Newsvendor under Model Misspecification [2.801095519296785]
  We propose a model-free and distribution-free framework inspired by conformal prediction. We validate our framework using both simulated data and a real-world dataset from the Capital Bikeshare program in Washington, D.C.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T18:34:43Z)
• Provably Reliable Conformal Prediction Sets in the Presence of Data Poisoning [53.42244686183879]
  Conformal prediction provides model-agnostic and distribution-free uncertainty quantification.<n>Yet, conformal prediction is not reliable under poisoning attacks where adversaries manipulate both training and calibration data.<n>We propose reliable prediction sets (RPS): the first efficient method for constructing conformal prediction sets with provable reliability guarantees under poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T15:37:11Z)
• Split Conformal Prediction under Data Contamination [14.23965125128232]
  We study the robustness of split conformal prediction in a data contamination setting. We quantify the impact of corrupted data on the coverage and efficiency of the constructed sets. We propose an adjustment in the classification setting which we call Contamination Robust Conformal Prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T14:33:28Z)
• The Penalized Inverse Probability Measure for Conformal Classification [0.5172964916120902]
  The work introduces the Penalized Inverse Probability (PIP) nonconformity score, and its regularized version RePIP, that allow the joint optimization of both efficiency and informativeness. The work shows how PIP-based conformal classifiers exhibit precisely the desired behavior in comparison with other nonconformity measures and strike a good balance between informativeness and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T07:37:16Z)
• Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selection [82.43311784594384]
  Real-world datasets contain not only noisy labels but also class imbalance. We propose a simple yet effective method to address noisy labels in imbalanced datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T10:34:53Z)
• On the Expected Size of Conformal Prediction Sets [24.161372736642157]
  We theoretically quantify the expected size of the prediction sets under the split conformal prediction framework. As this precise formulation cannot usually be calculated directly, we derive point estimates and high-probability bounds interval. We corroborate the efficacy of our results with experiments on real-world datasets for both regression and classification problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T17:22:57Z)
• Improving Adaptive Conformal Prediction Using Self-Supervised Learning [72.2614468437919]
  We train an auxiliary model with a self-supervised pretext task on top of an existing predictive model and use the self-supervised error as an additional feature to estimate nonconformity scores. We empirically demonstrate the benefit of the additional information using both synthetic and real data on the efficiency (width), deficit, and excess of conformal prediction intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T18:57:14Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Taming Overconfident Prediction on Unlabeled Data from Hindsight [50.9088560433925]
  Minimizing prediction uncertainty on unlabeled data is a key factor to achieve good performance in semi-supervised learning. This paper proposes a dual mechanism, named ADaptive Sharpening (ADS), which first applies a soft-threshold to adaptively mask out determinate and negligible predictions. ADS significantly improves the state-of-the-art SSL methods by making it a plug-in.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T15:17:02Z)
• Robust Validation: Confident Predictions Even When Distributions Shift [19.327409270934474]
  We describe procedures for robust predictive inference, where a model provides uncertainty estimates on its predictions rather than point predictions. We present a method that produces prediction sets (almost exactly) giving the right coverage level for any test distribution in an $f$-divergence ball around the training population. An essential component of our methodology is to estimate the amount of expected future data shift and build robustness to it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T17:09:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.