Automated Unit Test Case Generation: A Systematic Literature Review

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20357v1
• Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 01:50:06 GMT
• Title: Automated Unit Test Case Generation: A Systematic Literature Review
• Authors: Jason Wang, Basem Suleiman, Muhammad Johan Alibasa,
• Abstract summary: This review aims to consolidate existing knowledge in regards to the evolutionary approaches as well as their improvements and resulting limitations.<n>We will explore the main test criterion that are used in these algorithms alongside the challenges currently faced in the field related to readability, mocking and more.
• Score: 2.273531916003657
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Software is omnipresent within all factors of society. It is thus important to ensure that software are well tested to mitigate bad user experiences as well as the potential for severe financial and human losses. Software testing is however expensive and absorbs valuable time and resources. As a result, the field of automated software testing has grown of interest to researchers in past decades. In our review of present and past research papers, we have identified an information gap in the areas of improvement for the Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimisation. A gap in knowledge in the current challenges that face automated testing has also been identified. We therefore present this systematic literature review in an effort to consolidate existing knowledge in regards to the evolutionary approaches as well as their improvements and resulting limitations. These improvements include hybrid algorithm combinations as well as interoperability with mutation testing and neural networks. We will also explore the main test criterion that are used in these algorithms alongside the challenges currently faced in the field related to readability, mocking and more.

Related papers

• Requirements-Driven Automated Software Testing: A Systematic Review [13.67495800498868]
  This study synthesizes the current state of REDAST research, highlights trends, and proposes future directions.<n>This systematic literature review ( SLR) explores the landscape of REDAST by analyzing requirements input, transformation techniques, test outcomes, evaluation methods, and existing limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T23:13:09Z)
• The Future of Software Testing: AI-Powered Test Case Generation and Validation [0.0]
  This paper explores the transformative potential of AI in improving test case generation and validation. It focuses on its ability to enhance efficiency, accuracy, and scalability in testing processes. It also addresses key challenges associated with adapting AI for testing, including the need for high quality training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T17:12:40Z)
• The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software Testing [0.14896196009851972]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have significantly impacted various industries. Software testing, a crucial part of the software development lifecycle (SDLC), ensures the quality and reliability of software products. This paper explores the role of AI and ML in software testing by reviewing existing literature, analyzing current tools and techniques, and presenting case studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T13:25:13Z)
• AutoSurvey: Large Language Models Can Automatically Write Surveys [77.0458309675818]
  This paper introduces AutoSurvey, a speedy and well-organized methodology for automating the creation of comprehensive literature surveys. Traditional survey paper creation faces challenges due to the vast volume and complexity of information. Our contributions include a comprehensive solution to the survey problem, a reliable evaluation method, and experimental validation demonstrating AutoSurvey's effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T12:56:06Z)
• Software Testing of Generative AI Systems: Challenges and Opportunities [5.634825161148484]
  I will explore the challenges posed by generative AI systems and discuss potential opportunities for future research in the field of testing. I will touch on the specific characteristics of GenAI systems that make traditional testing techniques inadequate or insufficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T08:35:49Z)
• Using Machine Learning To Identify Software Weaknesses From Software Requirement Specifications [49.1574468325115]
  This research focuses on finding an efficient machine learning algorithm to identify software weaknesses from requirement specifications. Keywords extracted using latent semantic analysis help map the CWE categories to PROMISE_exp. Naive Bayes, support vector machine (SVM), decision trees, neural network, and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms were tested.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-10T13:19:10Z)
• A Gold Standard Dataset for the Reviewer Assignment Problem [117.59690218507565]
  "Similarity score" is a numerical estimate of the expertise of a reviewer in reviewing a paper. Our dataset consists of 477 self-reported expertise scores provided by 58 researchers. For the task of ordering two papers in terms of their relevance for a reviewer, the error rates range from 12%-30% in easy cases to 36%-43% in hard cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T16:15:03Z)
• Constrained Adversarial Learning and its applicability to Automated Software Testing: a systematic review [0.0]
  This systematic review is focused on the current state-of-the-art of constrained data generation methods applied for adversarial learning and software testing. It aims to guide researchers and developers to enhance testing tools with adversarial learning methods and improve the resilience and robustness of their digital systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T00:27:33Z)
• SUPERNOVA: Automating Test Selection and Defect Prevention in AAA Video Games Using Risk Based Testing and Machine Learning [62.997667081978825]
  Testing video games is an increasingly difficult task as traditional methods fail to scale with growing software systems. We present SUPERNOVA, a system responsible for test selection and defect prevention while also functioning as an automation hub. The direct impact of this has been observed to be a reduction in 55% or more testing hours for an undisclosed sports game title.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T00:47:46Z)
• Benchmarking Quality-Dependent and Cost-Sensitive Score-Level Multimodal Biometric Fusion Algorithms [58.156733807470395]
  This paper reports a benchmarking study carried out within the framework of the BioSecure DS2 (Access Control) evaluation campaign. The campaign targeted the application of physical access control in a medium-size establishment with some 500 persons. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to benchmark quality-based multimodal fusion algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-17T13:39:48Z)
• Bias in Multimodal AI: Testbed for Fair Automatic Recruitment [73.85525896663371]
  We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data. We train automatic recruitment algorithms using a set of multimodal synthetic profiles consciously scored with gender and racial biases. Our methodology and results show how to generate fairer AI-based tools in general, and in particular fairer automated recruitment systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T15:58:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.