Democratizing Differential Privacy: A Participatory AI Framework for Public Decision-Making

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.21297v2
• Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 21:11:31 GMT
• Title: Democratizing Differential Privacy: A Participatory AI Framework for Public Decision-Making
• Authors: Wenjun Yang, Eyhab Al-Masri,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a conversational interface system that enables participatory design of differentially private AI systems in public sector applications.<n>Our results advance participatory AI practices by demonstrating how conversational interfaces can enhance public engagement in algorithmic privacy mechanisms.
• Score: 2.1967674611287444
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper introduces a conversational interface system that enables participatory design of differentially private AI systems in public sector applications. Addressing the challenge of balancing mathematical privacy guarantees with democratic accountability, we propose three key contributions: (1) an adaptive $\epsilon$-selection protocol leveraging TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis to align citizen preferences with differential privacy (DP) parameters, (2) an explainable noise-injection framework featuring real-time Mean Absolute Error (MAE) visualizations and GPT-4-powered impact analysis, and (3) an integrated legal-compliance mechanism that dynamically modulates privacy budgets based on evolving regulatory constraints. Our results advance participatory AI practices by demonstrating how conversational interfaces can enhance public engagement in algorithmic privacy mechanisms, ensuring that privacy-preserving AI in public sector governance remains both mathematically robust and democratically accountable.

Related papers

• From Statistical Disclosure Control to Fair AI: Navigating Fundamental Tradeoffs in Differential Privacy [0.0]
  Differential privacy has become the gold standard for privacy-preserving machine learning systems.<n>This paper provides a systematic treatment connecting three threads: Dalenius's impossibility results for semantic privacy, Dwork's differential privacy as an achievable alternative, and emerging impossibility results from the addition of a fairness requirement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T17:07:00Z)
• Of the People, By the Algorithm: How AI Transforms Democratic Representation [0.0]
  AI technologies are transforming democratic representation, focusing on citizen participation and algorithmic decision-making.<n>Social media platforms' AI-driven algorithms currently mediate much political discourse.<n>The emergence of Mass Online Deliberation platforms suggests possibilities for scaling up meaningful citizen participation.<n>Algorithmic Decision-Making systems promise more efficient policy implementation but face limitations in handling complex political trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T13:54:17Z)
• Differential Privacy in Machine Learning: From Symbolic AI to LLMs [49.1574468325115]
  Differential privacy provides a formal framework to mitigate privacy risks.<n>It ensures that the inclusion or exclusion of any single data point does not significantly alter the output of an algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T11:30:35Z)
• A Multi-Layered Research Framework for Human-Centered AI: Defining the Path to Explainability and Trust [2.4578723416255754]
  Human-Centered AI (HCAI) emphasizes alignment with human values, while Explainable AI (XAI) enhances transparency by making AI decisions more understandable.<n>This paper presents a novel three-layered framework that bridges HCAI and XAI to establish a structured explainability paradigm.<n>Our findings advance Human-Centered Explainable AI (HCXAI), fostering AI systems that are transparent, adaptable, and ethically aligned.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T01:29:30Z)
• Achieving Socio-Economic Parity through the Lens of EU AI Act [11.550643687258738]
  Unfair treatment and discrimination are critical ethical concerns in AI systems. The recent introduction of the EU AI Act establishes a unified legal framework to ensure legal certainty for AI innovation and investment. We propose a novel fairness notion, Socio-Economic Parity (SEP), which incorporates Socio-Economic Status (SES) and promotes positive actions for underprivileged groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T12:27:27Z)
• In-House Evaluation Is Not Enough: Towards Robust Third-Party Flaw Disclosure for General-Purpose AI [93.33036653316591]
  We call for three interventions to advance system safety.<n>First, we propose using standardized AI flaw reports and rules of engagement for researchers.<n>Second, we propose GPAI system providers adopt broadly-scoped flaw disclosure programs.<n>Third, we advocate for the development of improved infrastructure to coordinate distribution of flaw reports.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T05:09:46Z)
• Privacy Ethics Alignment in AI: A Stakeholder-Centric Based Framework for Ethical AI [0.0]
  This study explores evolving privacy concerns across three key stakeholder groups, digital citizens (ages 16-19), parents/educators, and AI professionals.<n>Young users emphasize autonomy and digital freedom, while parents and educators advocate for regulatory oversight and AI literacy programs.<n>The data further highlights gaps in AI literacy and transparency, emphasizing the need for stakeholder-driven privacy frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-15T01:42:45Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Human Decision-making is Susceptible to AI-driven Manipulation [87.24007555151452]
  AI systems may exploit users' cognitive biases and emotional vulnerabilities to steer them toward harmful outcomes. This study examined human susceptibility to such manipulation in financial and emotional decision-making contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T15:56:22Z)
• Democratizing AI Governance: Balancing Expertise and Public Participation [1.0878040851638]
  The development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, with their profound societal impacts, raise critical challenges for governance. This article explores the tension between expert-led oversight and democratic participation, analyzing models of participatory and deliberative democracy. Recommendations are provided for integrating these approaches into a balanced governance model tailored to the European Union.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T17:47:33Z)
• AI Delegates with a Dual Focus: Ensuring Privacy and Strategic Self-Disclosure [42.96087647326612]
  We conduct a pilot study to investigate user preferences for AI delegates across various social relations and task scenarios. We then propose a novel AI delegate system that enables privacy-conscious self-disclosure. Our user study demonstrates that the proposed AI delegate strategically protects privacy, pioneering its use in diverse and dynamic social interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T08:45:15Z)
• TernaryVote: Differentially Private, Communication Efficient, and Byzantine Resilient Distributed Optimization on Heterogeneous Data [50.797729676285876]
  We propose TernaryVote, which combines a ternary compressor and the majority vote mechanism to realize differential privacy, gradient compression, and Byzantine resilience simultaneously. We theoretically quantify the privacy guarantee through the lens of the emerging f-differential privacy (DP) and the Byzantine resilience of the proposed algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T16:41:14Z)
• Personalized Reinforcement Learning with a Budget of Policies [9.846353643883443]
  Personalization in machine learning (ML) tailors models' decisions to the individual characteristics of users. We propose a novel framework termed represented Markov Decision Processes (r-MDPs) that is designed to balance the need for personalization with the regulatory constraints. In an r-MDP, we cater to a diverse user population, each with unique preferences, through interaction with a small set of representative policies. We develop two deep reinforcement learning algorithms that efficiently solve r-MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T11:27:55Z)
• Bridging the gap: Towards an Expanded Toolkit for AI-driven Decision-Making in the Public Sector [6.693502127460251]
  AI-driven decision-making systems are becoming instrumental in the public sector, with applications spanning areas like criminal justice, social welfare, financial fraud detection, and public health. These systems face the challenge of aligning machine learning (ML) models with the complex realities of public sector decision-making. We examine five key challenges where misalignment can occur, including distribution shifts, label bias, the influence of past decision-making on the data side, as well as competing objectives and human-in-the-loop on the model output side.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T17:44:48Z)
• A Randomized Approach for Tight Privacy Accounting [63.67296945525791]
  We propose a new differential privacy paradigm called estimate-verify-release (EVR) EVR paradigm first estimates the privacy parameter of a mechanism, then verifies whether it meets this guarantee, and finally releases the query output. Our empirical evaluation shows the newly proposed EVR paradigm improves the utility-privacy tradeoff for privacy-preserving machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T00:38:01Z)
• On Differentially Private Federated Linear Contextual Bandits [9.51828574518325]
  We consider cross-silo federated linear contextual bandit (LCB) problem under differential privacy. We identify three issues in the state-of-the-art: (i) failure of claimed privacy protection and (ii) incorrect regret bound due to noise miscalculation. We show that our algorithm can achieve nearly optimal'' regret without a trusted server.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T16:47:49Z)
• Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoff with $f$-Differential Privacy [51.11280118806893]
  We consider a federated data analytics problem in which a server coordinates the collaborative data analysis of multiple users with privacy concerns and limited communication capability. We study the local differential privacy guarantees of discrete-valued mechanisms with finite output space through the lens of $f$-differential privacy (DP) More specifically, we advance the existing literature by deriving tight $f$-DP guarantees for a variety of discrete-valued mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T16:58:53Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Decentralized Stochastic Optimization with Inherent Privacy Protection [103.62463469366557]
  Decentralized optimization is the basic building block of modern collaborative machine learning, distributed estimation and control, and large-scale sensing. Since involved data, privacy protection has become an increasingly pressing need in the implementation of decentralized optimization algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-08T14:38:23Z)
• Privacy-Constrained Policies via Mutual Information Regularized Policy Gradients [54.98496284653234]
  We consider the task of training a policy that maximizes reward while minimizing disclosure of certain sensitive state variables through the actions. We solve this problem by introducing a regularizer based on the mutual information between the sensitive state and the actions. We develop a model-based estimator for optimization of privacy-constrained policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-30T03:22:35Z)
• More Than Privacy: Applying Differential Privacy in Key Areas of Artificial Intelligence [62.3133247463974]
  We show that differential privacy can do more than just privacy preservation in AI. It can also be used to improve security, stabilize learning, build fair models, and impose composition in selected areas of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T03:07:36Z)
• Contestable Black Boxes [10.552465253379134]
  This paper investigates the type of assurances that are needed in the contesting process when algorithmic black-boxes are involved. We argue that specialised complementary methodologies to evaluate automated decision-making in the case of a particular decision being contested need to be developed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-09T09:09:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.