Constructing an Optimal Behavior Basis for the Option Keyboard

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00787v1
• Date: Thu, 01 May 2025 18:32:21 GMT
• Title: Constructing an Optimal Behavior Basis for the Option Keyboard
• Authors: Lucas N. Alegre, Ana L. C. Bazzan, André Barreto, Bruno C. da Silva,
• Abstract summary: Generalized Policy Improvement (GPI) addresses this by combining a set of base policies to produce a new one that is at least as good.<n>The Option Keyboard (OK) improves upon GPI by producing policies that are at least as good -- and often better.<n>This raises a key question: is there an optimal set of base policies that enables zero-shot identification of optimal solutions for any linear tasks?<n>We show that it significantly reduces the number of base policies needed to ensure optimality in new tasks.
• Score: 15.595163824752769
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-task reinforcement learning aims to quickly identify solutions for new tasks with minimal or no additional interaction with the environment. Generalized Policy Improvement (GPI) addresses this by combining a set of base policies to produce a new one that is at least as good -- though not necessarily optimal -- as any individual base policy. Optimality can be ensured, particularly in the linear-reward case, via techniques that compute a Convex Coverage Set (CCS). However, these are computationally expensive and do not scale to complex domains. The Option Keyboard (OK) improves upon GPI by producing policies that are at least as good -- and often better. It achieves this through a learned meta-policy that dynamically combines base policies. However, its performance critically depends on the choice of base policies. This raises a key question: is there an optimal set of base policies -- an optimal behavior basis -- that enables zero-shot identification of optimal solutions for any linear tasks? We solve this open problem by introducing a novel method that efficiently constructs such an optimal behavior basis. We show that it significantly reduces the number of base policies needed to ensure optimality in new tasks. We also prove that it is strictly more expressive than a CCS, enabling particular classes of non-linear tasks to be solved optimally. We empirically evaluate our technique in challenging domains and show that it outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, increasingly so as task complexity increases.

Related papers

• Convergence and Sample Complexity of First-Order Methods for Agnostic Reinforcement Learning [66.4260157478436]
  We study reinforcement learning in the policy learning setting.<n>The goal is to find a policy whose performance is competitive with the best policy in a given class of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T14:40:05Z)
• Offline Imitation Learning from Multiple Baselines with Applications to Compiler Optimization [17.729842629392742]
  We study a Reinforcement Learning problem in which we are given a set of trajectories collected with K baseline policies. The goal is to learn a policy which performs as well as the best combination of baselines on the entire state space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T14:34:02Z)
• Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment [93.39181634597877]
  Direct preference optimization (DPO) was proposed to directly optimize the policy from preference data. We show that DPO derived based on the optimal solution of problem leads to a compromised mean-seeking approximation of the optimal solution in practice. We propose efficient exact optimization (EXO) of the alignment objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:51:54Z)
• Optimistic Natural Policy Gradient: a Simple Efficient Policy Optimization Framework for Online RL [23.957148537567146]
  This paper proposes a simple efficient policy optimization framework -- Optimistic NPG for online RL. For $d$-dimensional linear MDPs, Optimistic NPG is computationally efficient, and learns an $varepsilon$-optimal policy within $tildeO(d2/varepsilon3)$ samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T15:19:26Z)
• Sample-Efficient Multi-Objective Learning via Generalized Policy Improvement Prioritization [8.836422771217084]
  Multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) algorithms tackle sequential decision problems where agents may have different preferences. We introduce a novel algorithm that uses Generalized Policy Improvement (GPI) to define principled, formally-derived prioritization schemes. We empirically show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art MORL algorithms in challenging multi-objective tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-18T20:54:40Z)
• Policy learning "without" overlap: Pessimism and generalized empirical Bernstein's inequality [94.89246810243053]
  This paper studies offline policy learning, which aims at utilizing observations collected a priori to learn an optimal individualized decision rule. Existing policy learning methods rely on a uniform overlap assumption, i.e., the propensities of exploring all actions for all individual characteristics must be lower bounded. We propose Pessimistic Policy Learning (PPL), a new algorithm that optimize lower confidence bounds (LCBs) instead of point estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T22:43:08Z)
• Optimistic Linear Support and Successor Features as a Basis for Optimal Policy Transfer [7.970144204429356]
  We introduce an SF-based extension of the Optimistic Linear Support algorithm to learn a set of policies whose SFs form a convex coverage set. We prove that policies in this set can be combined via generalized policy improvement to construct optimal behaviors for any new linearly-expressible tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T19:00:08Z)
• Understanding the Effect of Stochasticity in Policy Optimization [86.7574122154668]
  We show that the preferability of optimization methods depends critically on whether exact gradients are used. Second, to explain these findings we introduce the concept of committal rate for policy optimization. Third, we show that in the absence of external oracle information, there is an inherent trade-off between exploiting geometry to accelerate convergence versus achieving optimality almost surely.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T06:35:44Z)
• Optimistic Policy Optimization is Provably Efficient in Non-stationary MDPs [113.8752163061151]
  We study episodic reinforcement learning (RL) in non-stationary linear kernel Markov decision processes (MDPs)<n>We propose the underlineperiodically underlinerestarted underlineoptimistic underlinepolicy underlineoptimization algorithm (PROPO)<n>PROPO features two mechanisms: sliding-window-based policy evaluation and periodic-restart-based policy improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T02:33:20Z)
• On the Optimality of Batch Policy Optimization Algorithms [106.89498352537682]
  Batch policy optimization considers leveraging existing data for policy construction before interacting with an environment. We show that any confidence-adjusted index algorithm is minimax optimal, whether it be optimistic, pessimistic or neutral. We introduce a new weighted-minimax criterion that considers the inherent difficulty of optimal value prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-06T05:23:20Z)
• First Order Constrained Optimization in Policy Space [19.00289722198614]
  We propose a novel approach called First Order Constrained Optimization in Policy Space (FOCOPS) FOCOPS maximizes an agent's overall reward while ensuring the agent satisfies a set of cost constraints. We provide empirical evidence that our simple approach achieves better performance on a set of constrained robotics locomotive tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-16T05:07:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.