Automatic techniques for issue report classification: A systematic mapping study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01469v1
• Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 09:44:25 GMT
• Title: Automatic techniques for issue report classification: A systematic mapping study
• Authors: Muhammad Laiq, Felix Dobslaw,
• Abstract summary: This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of automatic techniques to classify issue reports.<n>The study results indicate that the existing literature applies various techniques for classifying issue reports, including traditional machine learning and deep learning-based techniques and more advanced large language models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Several studies have evaluated automatic techniques for classifying software issue reports to assist practitioners in effectively assigning relevant resources based on the type of issue. Currently, no comprehensive overview of this area has been published. A comprehensive overview will help identify future research directions and provide an extensive collection of potentially relevant existing solutions. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of automatic techniques to classify issue reports. We conducted a systematic mapping study and identified 46 studies on the topic. The study results indicate that the existing literature applies various techniques for classifying issue reports, including traditional machine learning and deep learning-based techniques and more advanced large language models. Furthermore, we observe that these studies (a) lack the involvement of practitioners, (b) do not consider other potentially relevant adoption factors beyond prediction accuracy, such as the explainability, scalability, and generalizability of the techniques, and (c) mainly rely on archival data from open-source repositories only. Therefore, future research should focus on real industrial evaluations, consider other potentially relevant adoption factors, and actively involve practitioners.

Related papers

• A Systematic Literature Review on Detecting Software Vulnerabilities with Large Language Models [2.518519330408713]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in software engineering have sparked interest in their use for software vulnerability detection.<n>The rapid development of this field has resulted in a fragmented research landscape.<n>This fragmentation makes it difficult to obtain a clear overview of the state-of-the-art or compare and categorize studies meaningfully.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T13:17:16Z)
• SyROCCo: Enhancing Systematic Reviews using Machine Learning [6.805429133535976]
  This paper explores the use of machine learning techniques to help navigate the systematic review process. The application of ML techniques to subsequent stages of a review, such as data extraction and evidence mapping, is in its infancy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T11:04:43Z)
• Ontology Embedding: A Survey of Methods, Applications and Resources [54.3453925775069]
  Onologies are widely used for representing domain knowledge and meta data.<n> logical reasoning that can directly support are quite limited in learning, approximation and prediction.<n>One straightforward solution is to integrate statistical analysis and machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T14:49:19Z)
• Machine Unlearning: A Survey [56.79152190680552]
  A special need has arisen where, due to privacy, usability, and/or the right to be forgotten, information about some specific samples needs to be removed from a model, called machine unlearning. This emerging technology has drawn significant interest from both academics and industry due to its innovation and practicality. No study has analyzed this complex topic or compared the feasibility of existing unlearning solutions in different kinds of scenarios. The survey concludes by highlighting some of the outstanding issues with unlearning techniques, along with some feasible directions for new research opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T10:18:36Z)
• Knowledge-enhanced Neural Machine Reasoning: A Review [67.51157900655207]
  We introduce a novel taxonomy that categorizes existing knowledge-enhanced methods into two primary categories and four subcategories. We elucidate the current application domains and provide insight into promising prospects for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-04T04:54:30Z)
• Navigating the reporting guideline environment for computational pathology: A review [0.685316573653194]
  The aim of this work is to highlight resources and reporting guidelines available to researchers working in computational pathology. Items were compiled to create a summary for easy identification of useful resources and guidance. Over 70 published resources applicable to pathology AI research were identified.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T23:17:51Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• A Survey on Machine Learning Techniques for Source Code Analysis [14.129976741300029]
  We aim to summarize the current knowledge in the area of applied machine learning for source code analysis. To do so, we carried out an extensive literature search and identified 364 primary studies published between 2002 and 2021.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T20:13:38Z)
• Deep Learning Schema-based Event Extraction: Literature Review and Current Trends [60.29289298349322]
  Event extraction technology based on deep learning has become a research hotspot. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches, focusing on deep learning-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T16:32:45Z)
• A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
  The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021. We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.