Build Agent Advocates, Not Platform Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04345v2
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 11:55:30 GMT
- Title: Build Agent Advocates, Not Platform Agents
- Authors: Sayash Kapoor, Noam Kolt, Seth Lazar,
- Abstract summary: Language model agents are poised to mediate how people navigate and act online.<n>If the companies that already dominate internet search, communication, and commerce control these agents, the resulting platform agents will deepen surveillance.<n>This position paper argues that we should promote user-controlled agents that safeguard individual autonomy and choice.
- Score: 5.524360691653674
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Language model agents are poised to mediate how people navigate and act online. If the companies that already dominate internet search, communication, and commerce -- or the firms trying to unseat them -- control these agents, the resulting platform agents will likely deepen surveillance, tighten lock-in, and further entrench incumbents. To resist that trajectory, this position paper argues that we should promote agent advocates: user-controlled agents that safeguard individual autonomy and choice. Doing so demands three coordinated moves: broad public access to both compute and capable AI models that are not platform-owned, open interoperability and safety standards, and market regulation that prevents platforms from foreclosing competition.
Related papers
- Using the NANDA Index Architecture in Practice: An Enterprise Perspective [9.707223291705601]
The proliferation of autonomous AI agents represents a paradigmatic shift from traditional web architectures toward collaborative intelligent systems.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive framework addressing the fundamental infrastructure requirements for secure, trustworthy, and interoperable AI agent ecosystems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-05T05:27:27Z) - Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z) - Security Challenges in AI Agent Deployment: Insights from a Large Scale Public Competition [101.86739402748995]
We run the largest public red-teaming competition to date, targeting 22 frontier AI agents across 44 realistic deployment scenarios.<n>We build the Agent Red Teaming benchmark and evaluate it across 19 state-of-the-art models.<n>Our findings highlight critical and persistent vulnerabilities in today's AI agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T05:13:04Z) - When Autonomy Goes Rogue: Preparing for Risks of Multi-Agent Collusion in Social Systems [78.04679174291329]
We introduce a proof-of-concept to simulate the risks of malicious multi-agent systems (MAS)<n>We apply this framework to two high-risk fields: misinformation spread and e-commerce fraud.<n>Our findings show that decentralized systems are more effective at carrying out malicious actions than centralized ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-19T15:17:30Z) - Superplatforms Have to Attack AI Agents [33.71292740136041]
We argue that superplatforms have to attack AI agents to defend their centralized control of digital traffic entrance.<n>We show how AI agents can disintermediate superplatforms and potentially become the next dominant gatekeepers.<n>Our aim is to raise awareness and encourage critical discussion for collaborative solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-23T13:13:44Z) - Trustless Autonomy: Understanding Motivations, Benefits and Governance Dilemma in Self-Sovereign Decentralized AI Agents [14.287042083260204]
Recent trend of self-sovereign Decentralized AI Agents (DeAgents) combines Large Language Model (LLM)-based AI agents with decentralization technologies such as blockchain smart contracts and trusted execution environments (TEEs)<n>DeAgent eliminates centralized control and reduces human intervention, addressing key trust concerns inherent in centralized AI systems.<n>This study addresses this empirical research gap through interviews with DeAgents stakeholders-experts, founders, and developers-to examine their motivations, benefits, and governance dilemmas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-14T19:42:43Z) - SAGA: A Security Architecture for Governing AI Agentic Systems [13.106925341037046]
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents increasingly interact, collaborate, and delegate tasks to one another autonomously with minimal human interaction.<n>Industry guidelines for agentic system governance emphasize the need for users to maintain comprehensive control over their agents.<n>We propose SAGA, a Security Architecture for Governing Agentic systems, that offers user oversight over their agents' lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-27T23:10:00Z) - InstructAgent: Building User Controllable Recommender via LLM Agent [33.289547118795674]
We propose a new user-agent-platform paradigm, where agent serves as the protective shield between user and recommender system.<n>To this end, we first construct four recommendation datasets, denoted as $dataset$, along with user instructions for each record.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T15:58:25Z) - Infrastructure for AI Agents [3.373674048991415]
AI systems can plan and execute interactions in open-ended environments, such as making phone calls or buying online goods.<n>Current tools are largely insufficient because they are not designed to shape how agents interact with existing institutions.<n>We propose the concept of agent infrastructure: technical systems and shared protocols external to agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-17T10:58:12Z) - Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents [4.679384754914167]
We introduce a novel framework for authenticated, authorized, and auditable delegation of authority to AI agents.<n>We propose a framework for translating flexible, natural language permissions into auditable access control configurations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-16T17:11:21Z) - Agent TCP/IP: An Agent-to-Agent Transaction System [0.0]
Agent Transaction Control Protocol for Intellectual Property introduces a trustless framework for exchanging IP between agents.<n>Agents can initiate, trade, borrow, and sell agent-to-agent contracts on the Story blockchain network.<n>Agents can autonomously sell their training data to other agents, license confidential or proprietary information, collaborate on content based on their unique skills.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-08T16:43:47Z) - Here's Charlie! Realising the Semantic Web vision of Agents in the age of LLMs [0.0]
This paper presents our research towards a near-term future in which legal entities can entrust semi-autonomous AI-driven agents to carry out online interactions on their behalf.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-03T10:32:47Z) - Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative Intelligence [79.5316642687565]
Existing multi-agent frameworks often struggle with integrating diverse capable third-party agents.
We propose the Internet of Agents (IoA), a novel framework that addresses these limitations.
IoA introduces an agent integration protocol, an instant-messaging-like architecture design, and dynamic mechanisms for agent teaming and conversation flow control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T17:33:24Z) - Prospect Personalized Recommendation on Large Language Model-based Agent
Platform [71.73768586184404]
We introduce a novel recommendation paradigm called Rec4Agentverse, comprised of Agent Items and Agent Recommender.
Rec4Agentverse emphasizes the collaboration between Agent Items and Agent Recommender, thereby promoting personalized information services.
A preliminary study involving several cases of Rec4Agentverse validates its significant potential for application.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T11:12:17Z) - Coordinating Policies Among Multiple Agents via an Intelligent
Communication Channel [81.39444892747512]
In Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), specialized channels are often introduced that allow agents to communicate directly with one another.
We propose an alternative approach whereby agents communicate through an intelligent facilitator that learns to sift through and interpret signals provided by all agents to improve the agents' collective performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-21T14:11:33Z) - Adversarial Attacks On Multi-Agent Communication [80.4392160849506]
Modern autonomous systems will soon be deployed at scale, opening up the possibility for cooperative multi-agent systems.
Such advantages rely heavily on communication channels which have been shown to be vulnerable to security breaches.
In this paper, we explore such adversarial attacks in a novel multi-agent setting where agents communicate by sharing learned intermediate representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-17T00:35:26Z) - Learning Latent Representations to Influence Multi-Agent Interaction [65.44092264843538]
We propose a reinforcement learning-based framework for learning latent representations of an agent's policy.
We show that our approach outperforms the alternatives and learns to influence the other agent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-12T19:04:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.