Detecting Spelling and Grammatical Anomalies in Russian Poetry Texts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04507v1
• Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 15:27:59 GMT
• Title: Detecting Spelling and Grammatical Anomalies in Russian Poetry Texts
• Authors: Ilya Koziev,
• Abstract summary: The quality of natural language texts in fine-tuning datasets plays a critical role in the performance of generative models.<n>We propose the use of automated linguistic anomaly detection to identify and filter out low-quality texts from training datasets for creative models.<n>Our work aims to empower the community with tools and insights to improve the quality of training datasets for generative models in creative domains.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The quality of natural language texts in fine-tuning datasets plays a critical role in the performance of generative models, particularly in computational creativity tasks such as poem or song lyric generation. Fluency defects in generated poems significantly reduce their value. However, training texts are often sourced from internet-based platforms without stringent quality control, posing a challenge for data engineers to manage defect levels effectively. To address this issue, we propose the use of automated linguistic anomaly detection to identify and filter out low-quality texts from training datasets for creative models. In this paper, we present a comprehensive comparison of unsupervised and supervised text anomaly detection approaches, utilizing both synthetic and human-labeled datasets. We also introduce the RUPOR dataset, a collection of Russian-language human-labeled poems designed for cross-sentence grammatical error detection, and provide the full evaluation code. Our work aims to empower the community with tools and insights to improve the quality of training datasets for generative models in creative domains.

Related papers

• SCOPE: A Self-supervised Framework for Improving Faithfulness in Conditional Text Generation [55.61004653386632]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce hallucinations, i.e., information that is unfaithful or not grounded in the input context.<n>This paper introduces a novel self-supervised method for generating a training set of unfaithful samples.<n>We then refine the model using a training process that encourages the generation of grounded outputs over unfaithful ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T12:31:58Z)
• Detecting Document-level Paraphrased Machine Generated Content: Mimicking Human Writing Style and Involving Discourse Features [57.34477506004105]
  Machine-generated content poses challenges such as academic plagiarism and the spread of misinformation.<n>We introduce novel methodologies and datasets to overcome these challenges.<n>We propose MhBART, an encoder-decoder model designed to emulate human writing style.<n>We also propose DTransformer, a model that integrates discourse analysis through PDTB preprocessing to encode structural features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T08:47:41Z)
• Harnessing the Intrinsic Knowledge of Pretrained Language Models for Challenging Text Classification Settings [5.257719744958367]
  This thesis explores three challenging settings in text classification by leveraging the intrinsic knowledge of pretrained language models (PLMs) We develop models that utilize features based on contextualized word representations from PLMs, achieving performance that rivals or surpasses human accuracy. Lastly, we tackle the sensitivity of large language models to in-context learning prompts by selecting effective demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T09:07:30Z)
• Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs [82.21278402856079]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textscLlama-2 and textscMistral. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:53:26Z)
• Text2Data: Low-Resource Data Generation with Textual Control [100.5970757736845]
  Text2Data is a novel approach that utilizes unlabeled data to understand the underlying data distribution.<n>It undergoes finetuning via a novel constraint optimization-based learning objective that ensures controllability and effectively counteracts catastrophic forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T03:41:39Z)
• Boosting Event Extraction with Denoised Structure-to-Text Augmentation [52.21703002404442]
  Event extraction aims to recognize pre-defined event triggers and arguments from texts. Recent data augmentation methods often neglect the problem of grammatical incorrectness. We propose a denoised structure-to-text augmentation framework for event extraction DAEE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T16:52:07Z)
• CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Data Limitation With Contrastive Learning [14.637303913878435]
  We present a coherence-based contrastive learning model named CoCo to detect the possible MGT under low-resource scenario. To exploit the linguistic feature, we encode coherence information in form of graph into text representation. Experiment results on two public datasets and two self-constructed datasets prove our approach outperforms the state-of-art methods significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T15:26:19Z)
• Leveraging Natural Supervision for Language Representation Learning and Generation [8.083109555490475]
  We describe three lines of work that seek to improve the training and evaluation of neural models using naturally-occurring supervision. We first investigate self-supervised training losses to help enhance the performance of pretrained language models for various NLP tasks. We propose a framework that uses paraphrase pairs to disentangle semantics and syntax in sentence representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T17:26:03Z)
• Curriculum-Based Self-Training Makes Better Few-Shot Learners for Data-to-Text Generation [56.98033565736974]
  We propose Curriculum-Based Self-Training (CBST) to leverage unlabeled data in a rearranged order determined by the difficulty of text generation. Our method can outperform fine-tuning and task-adaptive pre-training methods, and achieve state-of-the-art performance in the few-shot setting of data-to-text generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T16:11:58Z)
• A Benchmark Corpus for the Detection of Automatically Generated Text in Academic Publications [0.02578242050187029]
  This paper presents two datasets comprised of artificially generated research content. In the first case, the content is completely generated by the GPT-2 model after a short prompt extracted from original papers. The partial or hybrid dataset is created by replacing several sentences of abstracts with sentences that are generated by the Arxiv-NLP model. We evaluate the quality of the datasets comparing the generated texts to aligned original texts using fluency metrics such as BLEU and ROUGE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-04T08:16:56Z)
• Language Model Evaluation in Open-ended Text Generation [0.76146285961466]
  We study different evaluation metrics that have been proposed to evaluate quality, diversity and consistency of machine-generated text. From there, we propose a practical pipeline to evaluate language models in open-ended generation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-08T06:16:02Z)
• Russian Natural Language Generation: Creation of a Language Modelling Dataset and Evaluation with Modern Neural Architectures [0.0]
  We provide a novel reference dataset for Russian language modeling. We experiment with popular modern methods for text generation, namely variational autoencoders, and generative adversarial networks. We evaluate the generated text regarding metrics such as perplexity, grammatical correctness and lexical diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-05T20:20:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.