Prospects of Quantum Error Mitigation for Quantum Signal Processing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05614v1
• Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 19:49:54 GMT
• Title: Prospects of Quantum Error Mitigation for Quantum Signal Processing
• Authors: Ugnė Liaubaitė, S. E. Skelton,
• Abstract summary: This work explores the performance of zero-noise-extrapolation (ZNE) on a Hamiltonian simulation algorithm designed within quantum signal processing (QSP)<n>We quantify for which noise and depth regimes our ZNE protocol can recover an approximation of the noiseless expectation value.<n>We briefly discuss and present a numerical study on the region where ZNE is unusable, even given an unlimited sample budget.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantum error mitigation (QEM) protocols have provably exponential bounds on the cost scaling; however, exploring which regimes QEM can recover usable results is still of sizable interest. The expected absence of complete error correction for near-term and intermediate-term quantum devices means that QEM protocols will remain relevant for devices with low enough error rates to attempt small examples of fault-tolerant algorithms. Herein, we are interested in the performance of QEM with a template for quantum algorithms, quantum signal processing (QSP). QSP-based algorithms are designed with an especially simple relation between the circuit depths and the algorithm's parameters, including the required precision. Hence, they may be a useful playground for exploring QEM's practical performance and costs for a range of controlled parameters. As a preliminary step in this direction, this work explores the performance of zero-noise-extrapolation (ZNE) on a Hamiltonian simulation algorithm designed within QSP under local depolarizing noise. We design a QSP-based Hamiltonian simulation of a modified Ising model under depolarizing noise for low precision and varying simulation times. We quantify for which noise and depth regimes our ZNE protocol can recover an approximation of the noiseless expectation value. We discuss existing bounds on the sample budget, eventually using a fixed number of shots. While this does not guarantee the success of QEM, it gives us usable results in relevant cases. Finally, we briefly discuss and present a numerical study on the region where ZNE is unusable, even given an unlimited sample budget.

Related papers

• Statistical Signal Processing for Quantum Error Mitigation [12.804941908319792]
  We present a statistical signal processing approach to quantum error mitigation (QEM)<n>Our model assumes that circuit depth is sufficient for depolarizing noise, producing corrupted observations.<n>We show that our method scales to larger qubit counts using synthetically generated data consistent with our noise model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-31T19:34:19Z)
• Near-Term Fermionic Simulation with Subspace Noise Tailored Quantum Error Mitigation [0.0]
  We introduce the Subspace Noise Tailoring (SNT) algorithm, which efficiently combines Symmetry Verification (SV) and low bias of Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC) QEM techniques.<n>We study the performance of our method by simulating the Trotterized time evolution of the spin-1/2 Fermi-Hubbard model (FHM) using a variety of local fermion-to-qubit encodings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T18:20:54Z)
• Quantum Error Detection For Early Term Fault-Tolerant Quantum Algorithms [1.9556053645976448]
  We present a framework for fault-tolerant compilation and simulation of quantum algorithms.<n>Finding optimal syndrome schedules improves algorithm success probabilities by an average of 6.7x.<n>We propose a simple data-driven approach to predict fault tolerant compilation parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T18:34:01Z)
• Bayesian Quantum Amplitude Estimation [49.1574468325115]
  We introduce BAE, a noise-aware Bayesian algorithm for quantum amplitude estimation.<n>We show that BAE achieves Heisenberg-limited estimation and benchmark it against other approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T18:09:41Z)
• Mitigating Errors on Superconducting Quantum Processors through Fuzzy Clustering [38.02852247910155]
  A new Quantum Error Mitigation (QEM) technique uses Fuzzy C-Means clustering to specifically identify measurement error patterns. We report a proof-of-principle validation of the technique on a 2-qubit register, obtained as a subset of a real NISQ 5-qubit superconducting quantum processor. We demonstrate that the FCM-based QEM technique allows for reasonable improvement of the expectation values of single- and two-qubit gates based quantum circuits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T14:02:45Z)
• Adaptive quantum error mitigation using pulse-based inverse evolutions [0.0]
  We introduce a QEM method termed Adaptive KIK' that adapts to the noise level of the target device. The implementation of the method is experimentally simple -- it does not involve any tomographic information or machine-learning stage. We demonstrate our findings in the IBM quantum computers and through numerical simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T02:50:53Z)
• Importance sampling for stochastic quantum simulations [68.8204255655161]
  We introduce the qDrift protocol, which builds random product formulas by sampling from the Hamiltonian according to the coefficients. We show that the simulation cost can be reduced while achieving the same accuracy, by considering the individual simulation cost during the sampling stage. Results are confirmed by numerical simulations performed on a lattice nuclear effective field theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T15:06:32Z)
• End-to-end resource analysis for quantum interior point methods and portfolio optimization [63.4863637315163]
  We provide a complete quantum circuit-level description of the algorithm from problem input to problem output. We report the number of logical qubits and the quantity/depth of non-Clifford T-gates needed to run the algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-22T18:54:48Z)
• Error Mitigation-Aided Optimization of Parameterized Quantum Circuits: Convergence Analysis [42.275148861039895]
  Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) offer the most promising path to obtaining quantum advantages via noisy processors. gate noise due to imperfections and decoherence affects the gradient estimates by introducing a bias. Quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques can reduce the estimation bias without requiring any increase in the number of qubits. QEM can reduce the number of required iterations, but only as long as the quantum noise level is sufficiently small.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-23T10:48:04Z)
• Sampling Overhead Analysis of Quantum Error Mitigation: Uncoded vs. Coded Systems [69.33243249411113]
  We show that Pauli errors incur the lowest sampling overhead among a large class of realistic quantum channels. We conceive a scheme amalgamating QEM with quantum channel coding, and analyse its sampling overhead reduction compared to pure QEM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T15:51:27Z)
• Quantum circuit architecture search for variational quantum algorithms [88.71725630554758]
  We propose a resource and runtime efficient scheme termed quantum architecture search (QAS) QAS automatically seeks a near-optimal ansatz to balance benefits and side-effects brought by adding more noisy quantum gates. We implement QAS on both the numerical simulator and real quantum hardware, via the IBM cloud, to accomplish data classification and quantum chemistry tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T12:06:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.