Improving Random Forests by Smoothing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06852v1
• Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 05:39:08 GMT
• Title: Improving Random Forests by Smoothing
• Authors: Ziyi Liu, Phuc Luong, Mario Boley, Daniel F. Schmidt,
• Abstract summary: We apply a kernel-based smoothing mechanism to a learned random forest or any piecewise constant prediction function.<n>The resulting model consistently improves the predictive performance of the underlying random forests.
• Score: 13.20678906714433
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Gaussian process regression is a popular model in the small data regime due to its sound uncertainty quantification and the exploitation of the smoothness of the regression function that is encountered in a wide range of practical problems. However, Gaussian processes perform sub-optimally when the degree of smoothness is non-homogeneous across the input domain. Random forest regression partially addresses this issue by providing local basis functions of variable support set sizes that are chosen in a data-driven way. However, they do so at the expense of forgoing any degree of smoothness, which often results in poor performance in the small data regime. Here, we aim to combine the advantages of both models by applying a kernel-based smoothing mechanism to a learned random forest or any other piecewise constant prediction function. As we demonstrate empirically, the resulting model consistently improves the predictive performance of the underlying random forests and, in almost all test cases, also improves the log loss of the usual uncertainty quantification based on inter-tree variance. The latter advantage can be attributed to the ability of the smoothing model to take into account the uncertainty over the exact tree-splitting locations.

Related papers

• Revisiting Randomization in Greedy Model Search [16.15551706774035]
  We propose and analyze an ensemble of greedy forward selection estimators that are randomized by feature subsampling.<n>We design a novel implementation based on dynamic programming that greatly improves its computational efficiency.<n>Contrary to prevailing belief that randomized ensembling is analogous to shrinkage, we show that it can simultaneously reduce training error and degrees of freedom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T17:13:53Z)
• Accelerated zero-order SGD under high-order smoothness and overparameterized regime [79.85163929026146]
  We present a novel gradient-free algorithm to solve convex optimization problems. Such problems are encountered in medicine, physics, and machine learning. We provide convergence guarantees for the proposed algorithm under both types of noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T10:26:17Z)
• Adaptive Split Balancing for Optimal Random Forest [8.916614661563893]
  We propose a new random forest algorithm that constructs the trees using a novel adaptive split-balancing method. Our method achieves optimality in simple, smooth scenarios while adaptively learning the tree structure from the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T09:10:40Z)
• Sampling from Gaussian Process Posteriors using Stochastic Gradient Descent [43.097493761380186]
  gradient algorithms are an efficient method of approximately solving linear systems. We show that gradient descent produces accurate predictions, even in cases where it does not converge quickly to the optimum. Experimentally, gradient descent achieves state-of-the-art performance on sufficiently large-scale or ill-conditioned regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T15:07:37Z)
• Numerically Stable Sparse Gaussian Processes via Minimum Separation using Cover Trees [57.67528738886731]
  We study the numerical stability of scalable sparse approximations based on inducing points. For low-dimensional tasks such as geospatial modeling, we propose an automated method for computing inducing points satisfying these conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T15:20:17Z)
• On Uncertainty Estimation by Tree-based Surrogate Models in Sequential Model-based Optimization [13.52611859628841]
  We revisit various ensembles of randomized trees to investigate their behavior in the perspective of prediction uncertainty estimation. We propose a new way of constructing an ensemble of randomized trees, referred to as BwO forest, where bagging with oversampling is employed to construct bootstrapped samples. Experimental results demonstrate the validity and good performance of BwO forest over existing tree-based models in various circumstances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T04:50:37Z)
• Communication-Efficient Distributed Quantile Regression with Optimal Statistical Guarantees [2.064612766965483]
  We address the problem of how to achieve optimal inference in distributed quantile regression without stringent scaling conditions. The difficulties are resolved through a double-smoothing approach that is applied to the local (at each data source) and global objective functions. Despite the reliance on a delicate combination of local and global smoothing parameters, the quantile regression model is fully parametric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T17:09:59Z)
• Improving Uncertainty Calibration via Prior Augmented Data [56.88185136509654]
  Neural networks have proven successful at learning from complex data distributions by acting as universal function approximators. They are often overconfident in their predictions, which leads to inaccurate and miscalibrated probabilistic predictions. We propose a solution by seeking out regions of feature space where the model is unjustifiably overconfident, and conditionally raising the entropy of those predictions towards that of the prior distribution of the labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:02:37Z)
• Reducing the Amortization Gap in Variational Autoencoders: A Bayesian Random Function Approach [38.45568741734893]
  Inference in our GP model is done by a single feed forward pass through the network, significantly faster than semi-amortized methods. We show that our approach attains higher test data likelihood than the state-of-the-arts on several benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T13:01:12Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
• Multiplicative noise and heavy tails in stochastic optimization [62.993432503309485]
  empirical optimization is central to modern machine learning, but its role in its success is still unclear. We show that it commonly arises in parameters of discrete multiplicative noise due to variance. A detailed analysis is conducted in which we describe on key factors, including recent step size, and data, all exhibit similar results on state-of-the-art neural network models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T09:58:01Z)
• Gaussian Process Boosting [13.162429430481982]
  We introduce a novel way to combine boosting with Gaussian process and mixed effects models. We obtain increased prediction accuracy compared to existing approaches on simulated and real-world data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T13:19:54Z)
• Efficiently Sampling Functions from Gaussian Process Posteriors [76.94808614373609]
  We propose an easy-to-use and general-purpose approach for fast posterior sampling. We demonstrate how decoupled sample paths accurately represent Gaussian process posteriors at a fraction of the usual cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T14:03:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.