The Pitfalls of Benchmarking in Algorithm Selection: What We Are Getting Wrong

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07750v1
• Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 16:57:45 GMT
• Title: The Pitfalls of Benchmarking in Algorithm Selection: What We Are Getting Wrong
• Authors: Gašper Petelin, Gjorgjina Cenikj,
• Abstract summary: We highlight methodological issues that frequently occur in the community and should be addressed when evaluating algorithm selection approaches.<n>We show that non-informative features and meta-models can achieve high accuracy, which should not be the case with a well-designed evaluation framework.
• Score: 1.973144426163543
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Algorithm selection, aiming to identify the best algorithm for a given problem, plays a pivotal role in continuous black-box optimization. A common approach involves representing optimization functions using a set of features, which are then used to train a machine learning meta-model for selecting suitable algorithms. Various approaches have demonstrated the effectiveness of these algorithm selection meta-models. However, not all evaluation approaches are equally valid for assessing the performance of meta-models. We highlight methodological issues that frequently occur in the community and should be addressed when evaluating algorithm selection approaches. First, we identify flaws with the "leave-instance-out" evaluation technique. We show that non-informative features and meta-models can achieve high accuracy, which should not be the case with a well-designed evaluation framework. Second, we demonstrate that measuring the performance of optimization algorithms with metrics sensitive to the scale of the objective function requires careful consideration of how this impacts the construction of the meta-model, its predictions, and the model's error. Such metrics can falsely present overly optimistic performance assessments of the meta-models. This paper emphasizes the importance of careful evaluation, as loosely defined methodologies can mislead researchers, divert efforts, and introduce noise into the field

Related papers

• A Principled Approach to Randomized Selection under Uncertainty: Applications to Peer Review and Grant Funding [68.43987626137512]
  We propose a principled framework for randomized decision-making based on interval estimates of the quality of each item.<n>We introduce MERIT, an optimization-based method that maximizes the worst-case expected number of top candidates selected.<n>We prove that MERIT satisfies desirable axiomatic properties not guaranteed by existing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T19:59:30Z)
• An incremental preference elicitation-based approach to learning potentially non-monotonic preferences in multi-criteria sorting [53.36437745983783]
  We first construct a max-margin optimization-based model to model potentially non-monotonic preferences. We devise information amount measurement methods and question selection strategies to pinpoint the most informative alternative in each iteration. Two incremental preference elicitation-based algorithms are developed to learn potentially non-monotonic preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T14:36:20Z)
• A Survey of Meta-features Used for Automated Selection of Algorithms for Black-box Single-objective Continuous Optimization [4.173197621837912]
  We conduct an overview of the key contributions to algorithm selection in the field of single-objective continuous black-box optimization. We study machine learning models for automated algorithm selection, configuration, and performance prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T11:11:14Z)
• DynamoRep: Trajectory-Based Population Dynamics for Classification of Black-box Optimization Problems [0.755972004983746]
  We propose a feature extraction method that describes the trajectories of optimization algorithms using simple statistics. We demonstrate that the proposed DynamoRep features capture enough information to identify the problem class on which the optimization algorithm is running.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T06:57:07Z)
• Neural Improvement Heuristics for Graph Combinatorial Optimization Problems [49.85111302670361]
  We introduce a novel Neural Improvement (NI) model capable of handling graph-based problems where information is encoded in the nodes, edges, or both. The presented model serves as a fundamental component for hill-climbing-based algorithms that guide the selection of neighborhood operations for each.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T10:35:29Z)
• Compactness Score: A Fast Filter Method for Unsupervised Feature Selection [66.84571085643928]
  We propose a fast unsupervised feature selection method, named as, Compactness Score (CSUFS) to select desired features. Our proposed algorithm seems to be more accurate and efficient compared with existing algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T13:01:37Z)
• RoMA: Robust Model Adaptation for Offline Model-based Optimization [115.02677045518692]
  We consider the problem of searching an input maximizing a black-box objective function given a static dataset of input-output queries. A popular approach to solving this problem is maintaining a proxy model that approximates the true objective function. Here, the main challenge is how to avoid adversarially optimized inputs during the search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T05:37:12Z)
• Meta Learning Black-Box Population-Based Optimizers [0.0]
  We propose the use of meta-learning to infer population-based blackbox generalizations. We show that the meta-loss function encourages a learned algorithm to alter its search behavior so that it can easily fit into a new context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-05T08:13:25Z)
• Towards Feature-Based Performance Regression Using Trajectory Data [0.9281671380673306]
  Black-box optimization is a very active area of research, with many new algorithms being developed every year. The variety of algorithms poses a meta-problem: which algorithm to choose for a given problem at hand? Past research has shown that per-instance algorithm selection based on exploratory landscape analysis can be an efficient mean to tackle this meta-problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-10T10:19:13Z)
• Robust, Accurate Stochastic Optimization for Variational Inference [68.83746081733464]
  We show that common optimization methods lead to poor variational approximations if the problem is moderately large. Motivated by these findings, we develop a more robust and accurate optimization framework by viewing the underlying algorithm as producing a Markov chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T19:12:11Z)
• Stochastic Optimization Forests [60.523606291705214]
  We show how to train forest decision policies by growing trees that choose splits to directly optimize the downstream decision quality, rather than splitting to improve prediction accuracy as in the standard random forest algorithm. We show that our approximate splitting criteria can reduce running time hundredfold, while achieving performance close to forest algorithms that exactly re-optimize for every candidate split.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T16:56:06Z)
• Landscape-Aware Fixed-Budget Performance Regression and Algorithm Selection for Modular CMA-ES Variants [1.0965065178451106]
  We show that it is possible to achieve high-quality performance predictions with off-the-shelf supervised learning approaches. We test this approach on a portfolio of very similar algorithms, which we choose from the family of modular CMA-ES algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T13:34:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.