Naturalistic Metaphysics and the Parity Thesis: Why Scientific Realism Doesn't Lead to Realism about Metaphysics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07751v1
• Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 16:58:08 GMT
• Title: Naturalistic Metaphysics and the Parity Thesis: Why Scientific Realism Doesn't Lead to Realism about Metaphysics
• Authors: Raoni Arroyo, Matteo Morganti,
• Abstract summary: Nina Emery has defended the view that naturalists who are scientific realists ought to be realists about metaphysics as well.<n>This paper suggests that the parity thesis is widely, albeit often implicitly, accepted among naturalistically inclined philosophers.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In recent work, Nina Emery has defended the view that, in the context of naturalistic metaphysics, one should maintain the same epistemic attitude towards science and metaphysics. That is, naturalists who are scientific realists ought to be realists about metaphysics as well; and naturalists who are antirealists about science should also be antirealists about metaphysics. We call this the `parity thesis'. This paper suggests that the parity thesis is widely, albeit often implicitly, accepted among naturalistically inclined philosophers, and essentially for reasons similar to Emery's. Then, reasons are provided for resisting Emery's specific inference from scientific realism to realism about metaphysics. The resulting picture is a more nuanced view of the relationship between science and metaphysics within the naturalistic setting than the one which is currently most popular.

Related papers

• Antirealism in sheep's clothing: Wave function realism and scientific realism [0.0]
  Wave function realism holds that the wave function, as described by quantum mechanics, corresponds to a real physical entity.<n>We argue that this view raises tensions for the purported realism of wave function realism and its compatibility with scientific realism more broadly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T09:15:46Z)
• Disentangling scientific realism from anti-exceptionalism [0.0]
  We argue that scientific realism is a sort of sociological contingency rather than a metaphilosophical necessity.<n>We briefly explore the possibility of adopting antirealism as the background default view of science instead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T17:27:34Z)
• Mechanistic Interpretability Needs Philosophy [32.28998520468988]
  We argue that mechanistic interpretability needs philosophy: not as an afterthought, but as an ongoing partner in clarifying its concepts.<n>This position paper illustrates the value philosophy can add to MI research, and outlines a path toward deeper interdisciplinary dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T17:13:30Z)
• Exploring the Evolution of Physics Cognition in Video Generation: A Survey [44.305405114910904]
  This survey aims to provide a comprehensive summary of architecture designs and their applications to fill this gap.<n>We discuss and organize the evolutionary process of physical cognition in video generation from a cognitive science perspective.<n>We propose a three-tier taxonomy: 1) basic perception for generation, 2) passive cognition of physical knowledge for generation, and 3) active cognition for world simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T17:58:33Z)
• MetaScientist: A Human-AI Synergistic Framework for Automated Mechanical Metamaterial Design [39.56799107018762]
  We present MetaScientist, a human-in-the-loop system that integrates advanced AI capabilities with expert oversight.<n>At each phase, domain experts iteratively validate the system outputs, and provide feedback and supplementary materials to ensure the alignment of the outputs with scientific principles and human preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T15:20:57Z)
• The game of metaphysics [0.0]
  We argue that a fictionalist approach to metaphysics is compatible with both the idea that the discipline inquires into the fundamental features of reality and naturalistic methodology. We will claim that a fictionalist approach to metaphysics is compatible with both the idea that the discipline inquires into the fundamental features of reality and naturalistic methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T15:21:25Z)
• Intrinsic Physical Concepts Discovery with Object-Centric Predictive Models [86.25460882547581]
  We introduce the PHYsical Concepts Inference NEtwork (PHYCINE), a system that infers physical concepts in different abstract levels without supervision. We show that object representations containing the discovered physical concepts variables could help achieve better performance in causal reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T11:52:21Z)
• Whence deep realism for Everettian quantum mechanics? [0.0]
  Shallow' and deep' versions of scientific realism may be distinguished as follows: the shallow realist is satisfied with belief in the existence of the posits of our best scientific theories. By contrast, deep realists claim that realism can be legitimate only if such entities are described in metaphysical terms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-30T00:58:04Z)
• Realistic From Far But Far From Realism: Withering Scientific Realism in the Quantum Case [0.0]
  We argue that realism was never really at stake in the debate over scientific theory. We argue that scientific realists believe that empirically adequate theories can be supplemented by interpretations that can mirror reality-as-it-is.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-12T15:20:57Z)
• The (meta)metaphysics of science: the case of non-relativistic quantum mechanics [0.0]
  Traditionally, to be a realist about something means believing in the independent existence of that something. We discuss how two fashionable approaches face the challenge of providing a metaphysics for science. We present the meta-Popperian method, a metametaphysical method capable of objectively assessing which metaphysical profiles are incompatible with certain theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-01T18:55:44Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Floating free from physics: the metaphysics of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  We argue that, in this perspective, metaphysics must be understood as an autonomous discipline. One of the main motivations of such project is the obtaining of a scientifically respectable justification for the attribution of a single true metaphysical profile to the posits of a scientific theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T16:53:21Z)
• Attention: to Better Stand on the Shoulders of Giants [34.5017808610466]
  This paper develops an attention mechanism for the long-term scientific impact prediction. It validates the method based on a real large-scale citation data set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T00:25:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.