The (meta)metaphysics of science: the case of non-relativistic quantum mechanics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.00659v1
• Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 18:55:44 GMT
• Title: The (meta)metaphysics of science: the case of non-relativistic quantum mechanics
• Authors: Raoni W. Arroyo and Jonas R. B. Arenhart
• Abstract summary: Traditionally, to be a realist about something means believing in the independent existence of that something. We discuss how two fashionable approaches face the challenge of providing a metaphysics for science. We present the meta-Popperian method, a metametaphysical method capable of objectively assessing which metaphysical profiles are incompatible with certain theories.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Traditionally, to be a realist about something means believing in the independent existence of that something. In this line of thought, a scientific realist is someone who believes in the objective existence of the entities postulated by our best scientific theories. In metaphysical terms, what does that mean? In ontological terms, i.e., in terms about what exists, scientific realism can be understood as involving the adoption of an ontology that is scientifically informed. But according to some philosophers, the realistic attitude must go beyond ontology. The way in which this requirement has been understood involves providing a metaphysics for the entities postulated by science, that is, answering questions about the nature of what ontology admits to exist. We discuss how two fashionable approaches face the challenge of providing a metaphysics for science: a form of naturalism and the Viking/Toolbox approach. Finally, we present a third way, which adopts the best of both approaches: the meta-Popperian method, which focuses on discarding the wrong alternatives, or better saying, the metaphysical profiles incompatible with certain theories. We present the meta-Popperian method, a metametaphysical method capable of objectively assessing which metaphysical profiles are incompatible with certain scientific theories. For this, we will use quantum mechanics as a case study, presenting some previously obtained results. As our focus is on methodological questions about the relationship between metaphysics and science; with this method, we can see how science can be used to avoid error in metaphysical issues. In our opinion, this would be a way to develop a productive relationship between science and metaphysics.

Related papers

• The game of metaphysics [0.0]
  We argue that a fictionalist approach to metaphysics is compatible with both the idea that the discipline inquires into the fundamental features of reality and naturalistic methodology. We will claim that a fictionalist approach to metaphysics is compatible with both the idea that the discipline inquires into the fundamental features of reality and naturalistic methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T15:21:25Z)
• Quantum ontology de-naturalized: What we can't learn from quantum mechanics [0.0]
  Philosophers of science commonly connect ontology and science, stating that these disciplines maintain a two-way relationship. We will critically examine the process of naturalizing ontology, i.e., confining the work of ontologists merely to the task of pointing out which entities certain theories commit themselves to.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T13:26:13Z)
• Ontology-Driven Processing of Transdisciplinary Domain Knowledge [15.819087559924784]
  Modern science is unable to solve real-world problems in a fundamental way. Noosphere thesis appeals to the scientific worldview that needs to be built in a way that overcomes the interdisciplinary barriers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T07:42:34Z)
• Meta-Learned Models of Cognition [11.488249464936422]
  Meta-learning is a framework for learning algorithms through repeated interactions with an environment. This article aims to establish a coherent research program around meta-learned models of cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-12T16:30:51Z)
• Intrinsic Physical Concepts Discovery with Object-Centric Predictive Models [86.25460882547581]
  We introduce the PHYsical Concepts Inference NEtwork (PHYCINE), a system that infers physical concepts in different abstract levels without supervision. We show that object representations containing the discovered physical concepts variables could help achieve better performance in causal reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T11:52:21Z)
• To think inside the box, or to think out of the box? Scientific discovery via the reciprocation of insights and concepts [26.218943558900552]
  We view scientific discovery as an interplay between $thinking out of the box$ that actively seeks insightful solutions. We propose Mindle, a semantic searching game that triggers scientific-discovery-like thinking spontaneously. On this basis, the meta-strategies for insights and the usage of concepts can be investigated reciprocally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T03:52:12Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Standard Model Physics and the Digital Quantum Revolution: Thoughts about the Interface [68.8204255655161]
  Advances in isolating, controlling and entangling quantum systems are transforming what was once a curious feature of quantum mechanics into a vehicle for disruptive scientific and technological progress. From the perspective of three domain science theorists, this article compiles thoughts about the interface on entanglement, complexity, and quantum simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-10T06:12:06Z)
• Floating free from physics: the metaphysics of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  We argue that, in this perspective, metaphysics must be understood as an autonomous discipline. One of the main motivations of such project is the obtaining of a scientifically respectable justification for the attribution of a single true metaphysical profile to the posits of a scientific theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T16:53:21Z)
• Realism and metaphysics in quantum mechanics [0.0]
  According to scientific realism, science gives us an approximately true description of what the world is like. We focus on the ontological and metaphysical aspects of this discussion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-05T16:33:56Z)
• Undecidability and unpredictability: not limitations, but triumphs of science [0.0]
  It is a widespread belief that results like G"odel's incompleteness theorems represent fundamental limitations to humanity's strive for scientific knowledge. I argue that this view is wrong. It originates in a naive form of metaphysics that sees the physical and Platonic worlds as a collection of things with definite properties. I argue to replace this perspective by a worldview in which a structural notion of real patterns', not things' are regarded as fundamental.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-22T12:08:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.