CXMArena: Unified Dataset to benchmark performance in realistic CXM Scenarios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09436v2
• Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 06:27:01 GMT
• Title: CXMArena: Unified Dataset to benchmark performance in realistic CXM Scenarios
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) hold immense potential for revolutionizing Customer Experience Management ( CXM)<n> evaluating their practical utility in complex operational environments is hindered by data scarcity and the limitations of current benchmarks.<n>We introduce CXMArena, a novel, large-scale synthetic benchmark dataset specifically designed for evaluating AI in operational CXM contexts.
• Score: 2.453527617789368
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) hold immense potential for revolutionizing Customer Experience Management (CXM), particularly in contact center operations. However, evaluating their practical utility in complex operational environments is hindered by data scarcity (due to privacy concerns) and the limitations of current benchmarks. Existing benchmarks often lack realism, failing to incorporate deep knowledge base (KB) integration, real-world noise, or critical operational tasks beyond conversational fluency. To bridge this gap, we introduce CXMArena, a novel, large-scale synthetic benchmark dataset specifically designed for evaluating AI in operational CXM contexts. Given the diversity in possible contact center features, we have developed a scalable LLM-powered pipeline that simulates the brand's CXM entities that form the foundation of our datasets-such as knowledge articles including product specifications, issue taxonomies, and contact center conversations. The entities closely represent real-world distribution because of controlled noise injection (informed by domain experts) and rigorous automated validation. Building on this, we release CXMArena, which provides dedicated benchmarks targeting five important operational tasks: Knowledge Base Refinement, Intent Prediction, Agent Quality Adherence, Article Search, and Multi-turn RAG with Integrated Tools. Our baseline experiments underscore the benchmark's difficulty: even state of the art embedding and generation models achieve only 68% accuracy on article search, while standard embedding methods yield a low F1 score of 0.3 for knowledge base refinement, highlighting significant challenges for current models necessitating complex pipelines and solutions over conventional techniques.

Related papers

• riMESA: Consensus ADMM for Real-World Collaborative SLAM [19.173526713224206]
  We propose a robust, incremental, and distributed C-SLAM back-end that is resilient to outliers, reliable in the face of limited communication, and can compute accurate state estimates for a multi-robot team in real-time.<n>We conclude this work with an in-depth evaluation of riMESA on a variety of C-SLAM problem scenarios and communication network conditions using both synthetic and real-world C-SLAM data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T16:43:35Z)
• Benchmarking Agents in Insurance Underwriting Environments [0.9728664856449597]
  Existing benchmarks overemphasize open-domains such as code, use narrow accuracy metrics, and lack authentic complexity.<n>We present UNDERWRITE, an expert-first, multi-turn insurance underwriting benchmark designed in close collaboration with domain experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T02:12:11Z)
• Towards Comprehensive Benchmarking Infrastructure for LLMs In Software Engineering [19.584762693453893]
  BEHELM is a holistic benchmarking infrastructure that unifies software-scenario specification with multi-metric evaluation.<n>Our goal is to reduce the overhead currently required to construct benchmarks while enabling a fair, realistic, and future-proof assessment of LLMs in software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T21:55:10Z)
• Benchmarking that Matters: Rethinking Benchmarking for Practical Impact [2.952553461344481]
  We propose a vision centered on curated real-world-inspired benchmarks, practitioner-accessible feature spaces and community-maintained performance databases.<n>Real progress requires coordinated effort: A living benchmarking ecosystem that evolves with real-world insights and supports both scientific understanding and industrial use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T15:42:15Z)
• OutboundEval: A Dual-Dimensional Benchmark for Expert-Level Intelligent Outbound Evaluation of Xbench's Professional-Aligned Series [36.88936933010042]
  OutboundEval is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in intelligent outbound calling scenarios.<n>We design a benchmark spanning six major business domains and 30 representative sub-scenarios, each with scenario-specific process decomposition, weighted scoring, and domain-adaptive metrics.<n>We introduce a dynamic evaluation method that adapts to task variations, integrating automated and human-in-the-loop assessment to measure task execution accuracy, professional knowledge application, adaptability, and user experience quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T08:27:58Z)
• MCPVerse: An Expansive, Real-World Benchmark for Agentic Tool Use [72.53177559476704]
  We introduce MCPVerse, a real-world benchmark for evaluating agentic tool use.<n> MCPVerse integrates more than 550 real-world, executable tools to create an unprecedented action space exceeding 140k tokens.<n>We benchmarked the state-of-the-art LLMs across three modes (Oracle, Standard, and Max-Scale)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T09:47:53Z)
• MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers [86.00932417210477]
  We introduce MCP-Universe, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs in realistic and hard tasks through interaction with real-world MCP servers.<n>Our benchmark encompasses 6 core domains spanning 11 different MCP servers: Location Navigation, Repository Management, Financial Analysis, 3D Design, Browser Automation, and Web Searching.<n>We find that even SOTA models such as GPT-5 (43.72%), Grok-4 (33.33%) and Claude-4.0-Sonnet (29.44%) exhibit significant performance limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T13:28:58Z)
• OmniEAR: Benchmarking Agent Reasoning in Embodied Tasks [52.87238755666243]
  We present OmniEAR, a framework for evaluating how language models reason about physical interactions, tool usage, and multi-agent coordination in embodied tasks.<n>We model continuous physical properties and complex spatial relationships across 1,500 scenarios spanning household and industrial domains.<n>Our systematic evaluation reveals severe performance degradation when models must reason from constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T17:54:15Z)
• Can Large Language Models Generate Effective Datasets for Emotion Recognition in Conversations? [14.788624194380825]
  Emotion recognition in conversations (ERC) focuses on identifying emotion shifts within interactions.<n>Existing datasets face numerous challenges due to their highly biased sources and the inherent subjectivity of soft labels.<n>We employ a small, resource-efficient, and general-purpose LLM to synthesize ERC datasets with diverse properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T15:13:55Z)
• FailureSensorIQ: A Multi-Choice QA Dataset for Understanding Sensor Relationships and Failure Modes [7.788259584005182]
  We introduce FailureSensorIQ, a novel Multi-Choice Question-Answering (MCQA) benchmarking system.<n>Unlike traditional QA benchmarks, our system focuses on multiple aspects of reasoning through failure modes, sensor data, and the relationships between them across various industrial assets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T18:05:10Z)
• Evaluating LLM Metrics Through Real-World Capabilities [0.0]
  We analyze large-scale survey data and usage logs to identify six core capabilities that represent how people commonly use Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We then assess the extent to which existing benchmarks cover these capabilities, revealing significant gaps in coverage, efficiency measurement, and interpretability.<n>For four of the six capabilities, we identify the benchmarks that best align with real-world tasks and use them to compare leading models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T06:02:37Z)
• QLLM: Do We Really Need a Mixing Network for Credit Assignment in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning? [4.429189958406034]
  Credit assignment has remained a fundamental challenge in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL)<n>We propose a novel algorithm, textbfQLLM, which facilitates the automatic construction of credit assignment functions using large language models (LLMs)<n>Extensive experiments conducted on several standard MARL benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T14:07:11Z)
• Thinking Longer, Not Larger: Enhancing Software Engineering Agents via Scaling Test-Time Compute [61.00662702026523]
  We propose a unified Test-Time Compute scaling framework that leverages increased inference-time instead of larger models.<n>Our framework incorporates two complementary strategies: internal TTC and external TTC.<n>We demonstrate our textbf32B model achieves a 46% issue resolution rate, surpassing significantly larger models such as DeepSeek R1 671B and OpenAI o1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T07:31:32Z)
• Towards Human-Guided, Data-Centric LLM Co-Pilots [53.35493881390917]
  CliMB-DC is a human-guided, data-centric framework for machine learning co-pilots.<n>It combines advanced data-centric tools with LLM-driven reasoning to enable robust, context-aware data processing.<n>We show how CliMB-DC can transform uncurated datasets into ML-ready formats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-17T17:51:22Z)
• CRMArena: Understanding the Capacity of LLM Agents to Perform Professional CRM Tasks in Realistic Environments [90.29937153770835]
  We introduce CRMArena, a benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents on realistic tasks grounded in professional work environments.<n>We show that state-of-the-art LLM agents succeed in less than 40% of the tasks with ReAct prompting, and less than 55% even with function-calling abilities.<n>Our findings highlight the need for enhanced agent capabilities in function-calling and rule-following to be deployed in real-world work environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T17:30:51Z)
• SeCodePLT: A Unified Platform for Evaluating the Security of Code GenAI [58.29510889419971]
  Existing benchmarks for evaluating the security risks and capabilities of code-generating large language models (LLMs) face several key limitations.<n>We introduce a general and scalable benchmark construction framework that begins with manually validated, high-quality seed examples and expands them via targeted mutations.<n>Applying this framework to Python, C/C++, and Java, we build SeCodePLT, a dataset of more than 5.9k samples spanning 44 CWE-based risk categories and three security capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T21:17:22Z)
• MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains [54.117238759317004]
  Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark features comprehensive offline tasks that eliminate the need for complex environment setups. It evaluates models across five domains, including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics. With a total of 20 meticulously designed tasks encompassing over 3K distinct prompts, MMAU provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the strengths and limitations of LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T00:58:41Z)
• A Topical Approach to Capturing Customer Insight In Social Media [0.0]
  This research addresses the challenge of fully unsupervised topic extraction in noisy, Big Data contexts. We present three approaches we built on the Variational Autoencoder framework. We show that our models achieve equal to better performance than state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T11:15:28Z)
• DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Development [81.03754002516862]
  DataPerf is a community-led benchmark suite for evaluating ML datasets and data-centric algorithms. We provide an open, online platform with multiple rounds of challenges to support this iterative development. The benchmarks, online evaluation platform, and baseline implementations are open source.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T17:47:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.