Beyond the Human-AI Binaries: Advanced Writers' Self-Directed Use of Generative AI in Academic Writing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12165v1
• Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 22:48:44 GMT
• Title: Beyond the Human-AI Binaries: Advanced Writers' Self-Directed Use of Generative AI in Academic Writing
• Authors: Chaoran Wang, Wei Xu, Xiao Tan,
• Abstract summary: The study explores the self-directed use of Generative AI (GAI) in academic writing among advanced L2 English writers.<n>The findings revealed a spectrum of approaches to GAI, ranging from prescriptive to dialogic uses.<n>We highlight the ways AI disrupts traditional notions of authorship, text, and learning.
• Score: 16.24460569356749
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study explores the self-directed use of Generative AI (GAI) in academic writing among advanced L2 English writers, challenging assumptions that GAI undermines meaningful learning and holds less value for experienced learners. Through case studies, we investigate how three (post)doctoral writers engage with GAI to address specific L2 writing challenges. The findings revealed a spectrum of approaches to GAI, ranging from prescriptive to dialogic uses, with participants positioning AI as a tool versus an interactive participant in their meaning-making process, reflecting different views of AI as a mechanical system, social construct, or distributed agency. We highlight the ways AI disrupts traditional notions of authorship, text, and learning, showing how a poststructuralist lens allows us to transcend human-AI, writing-technology, and learning-bypassing binaries in our existing discourses on AI. This shifting view allows us to deconstruct and reconstruct AI's multifaceted possibilities in L2 writers' literacy practices. We also call for more nuanced ethical considerations to avoid stigmatizing L2 writers' use of GAI and to foster writerly virtues that reposition our relationship with AI technology.

Related papers

• Generative AI Literacy: A Comprehensive Framework for Literacy and Responsible Use [7.46277104253077]
  We propose a set of guidelines with 12 items for generative AI literacy.<n>These guidelines aim to support schools, companies, educators, and organizations in developing frameworks that empower their members to use generative AI in an efficient, ethical, and informed way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-26T22:14:48Z)
• Supporting Students' Reading and Cognition with AI [12.029238454394445]
  We analyzed text from 124 sessions with AI tools to understand users' reading processes and cognitive engagement.<n>We propose design implications for future AI reading-support systems, including structured scaffolds for lower-level cognitive tasks.<n>We advocate for adaptive, human-in-the-loop features that allow students and instructors to tailor their reading experiences with AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T17:51:27Z)
• AI Literacy in K-12 and Higher Education in the Wake of Generative AI: An Integrative Review [3.5297361401370044]
  There is little consensus among researchers and practitioners on how to discuss and design AI literacy interventions.<n>This paper applies an integrative review method to examine empirical and theoretical AI literacy studies published since 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T23:32:03Z)
• Converging Paradigms: The Synergy of Symbolic and Connectionist AI in LLM-Empowered Autonomous Agents [55.63497537202751]
  Article explores the convergence of connectionist and symbolic artificial intelligence (AI) Traditionally, connectionist AI focuses on neural networks, while symbolic AI emphasizes symbolic representation and logic. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) highlight the potential of connectionist architectures in handling human language as a form of symbols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T14:00:53Z)
• Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment: A Systematic Review for Clarifications, Framework, and Future Directions [101.67121669727354]
  Recent advancements in AI have highlighted the importance of guiding AI systems towards the intended goals, ethical principles, and values of individuals and groups, a concept broadly recognized as alignment. The lack of clarified definitions and scopes of human-AI alignment poses a significant obstacle, hampering collaborative efforts across research domains to achieve this alignment. We introduce a systematic review of over 400 papers published between 2019 and January 2024, spanning multiple domains such as Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI [0.0]
  This Perspective maps out principles and methods for using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to elevate the quality and efficiency of academic writing. We introduce a human-AI collaborative framework that delineates the rationale (why), process (how), and nature (what) of AI engagement in writing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T04:35:00Z)
• The Future of AI-Assisted Writing [0.0]
  We conduct a comparative user-study between such tools from an information retrieval lens: pull and push. Our findings show that users welcome seamless assistance of AI in their writing. Users also enjoyed the collaboration with AI-assisted writing tools and did not feel a lack of ownership.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T02:46:45Z)
• The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies [97.5153823429076]
  The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed. The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z)
• Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
  Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps. We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches. We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.