Unlabeled Data vs. Pre-trained Knowledge: Rethinking SSL in the Era of Large Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13317v4
• Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 05:49:40 GMT
• Title: Unlabeled Data vs. Pre-trained Knowledge: Rethinking SSL in the Era of Large Models
• Authors: Song-Lin Lv, Rui Zhu, Tong Wei, Yu-Feng Li, Lan-Zhe Guo,
• Abstract summary: Semi-supervised learning (SSL) alleviates the cost of data labeling process by exploiting unlabeled data.<n> exploiting pre-trained models becomes a promising way to address the label scarcity in the downstream tasks.<n>This raises a natural yet critical question: When labeled data is limited, should we rely on unlabeled data or pre-trained models?
• Score: 24.291082472792905
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Semi-supervised learning (SSL) alleviates the cost of data labeling process by exploiting unlabeled data and has achieved promising results. Meanwhile, with the development of large foundation models, exploiting pre-trained models becomes a promising way to address the label scarcity in the downstream tasks, such as various parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques. This raises a natural yet critical question: When labeled data is limited, should we rely on unlabeled data or pre-trained models? To investigate this issue, we conduct a fair comparison between SSL methods and pre-trained models (e.g., CLIP) on representative image classification tasks under a controlled supervision budget. Experiments reveal that SSL has met its ``Waterloo" in the era of large models, as pre-trained models show both high efficiency and strong performance on widely adopted SSL benchmarks. This underscores the urgent need for SSL researchers to explore new avenues, such as deeper integration between the SSL and pre-trained models. Furthermore, we investigate the potential of Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in image classification tasks. Results show that, despite their massive parameter scales, MLLMs still face significant performance limitations, highlighting that even a seemingly well-studied task remains highly challenging.

Related papers

• FATE: A Prompt-Tuning-Based Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Extremely Limited Labeled Data [36.21759320898034]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has achieved significant progress by leveraging both labeled data and unlabeled data.<n>We propose Firstly Adapt, Then catEgorize (FATE), a novel SSL framework tailored for scenarios with extremely limited labeled data.<n>FATE exploits unlabeled data to compensate for scarce supervision signals, then transfers to downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T02:54:28Z)
• Revisiting semi-supervised learning in the era of foundation models [28.414667991336067]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) leverages abundant unlabeled data alongside limited labeled data to enhance learning.<n>We develop new SSL benchmark datasets where frozen vision foundation models (VFMs) underperform and systematically evaluate representative SSL methods.<n>We make a surprising observation: parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) using only labeled data often matches SSL performance, even without leveraging unlabeled data.<n>To overcome the notorious issue of noisy pseudo-labels, we propose ensembling multiple PEFT approaches and VFM backbones to produce more robust pseudo-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T18:01:10Z)
• Learning with Less: Knowledge Distillation from Large Language Models via Unlabeled Data [54.934578742209716]
  In real-world NLP applications, Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising solutions due to their extensive training on vast datasets.<n>LLKD is an adaptive sample selection method that incorporates signals from both the teacher and student.<n>Our comprehensive experiments show that LLKD achieves superior performance across various datasets with higher data efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T18:57:59Z)
• A Closer Look at Benchmarking Self-Supervised Pre-training with Image Classification [51.35500308126506]
  Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a machine learning approach where the data itself provides supervision, eliminating the need for external labels. We study how classification-based evaluation protocols for SSL correlate and how well they predict downstream performance on different dataset types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T23:17:36Z)
• Erasing the Bias: Fine-Tuning Foundation Models for Semi-Supervised Learning [4.137391543972184]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has witnessed remarkable progress, resulting in numerous method variations. In this paper, we present a novel SSL approach named FineSSL that significantly addresses this limitation by adapting pre-trained foundation models. We demonstrate that FineSSL sets a new state of the art for SSL on multiple benchmark datasets, reduces the training cost by over six times, and can seamlessly integrate various fine-tuning and modern SSL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T03:33:12Z)
• Reinforcement Learning-Guided Semi-Supervised Learning [20.599506122857328]
  We propose a novel Reinforcement Learning Guided SSL method, RLGSSL, that formulates SSL as a one-armed bandit problem. RLGSSL incorporates a carefully designed reward function that balances the use of labeled and unlabeled data to enhance generalization performance. We demonstrate the effectiveness of RLGSSL through extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets and show that our approach achieves consistent superior performance compared to state-of-the-art SSL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T21:52:24Z)
• Self-supervised learning for skin cancer diagnosis with limited training data [0.196629787330046]
  Self-supervised learning (SSL) is an alternative to the standard supervised pre-training on ImageNet for scenarios with limited training data. We consider textitfurther SSL pre-training on task-specific datasets, where our implementation is motivated by supervised transfer learning. We find minimal further SSL pre-training on task-specific data can be as effective as large-scale SSL pre-training on ImageNet for medical image classification tasks with limited labelled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T08:11:38Z)
• Progressive Feature Adjustment for Semi-supervised Learning from Pretrained Models [39.42802115580677]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) can leverage both labeled and unlabeled data to build a predictive model. Recent literature suggests that naively applying state-of-the-art SSL with a pretrained model fails to unleash the full potential of training data. We propose to use pseudo-labels from the unlabelled data to update the feature extractor that is less sensitive to incorrect labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-09T01:57:14Z)
• To Repeat or Not To Repeat: Insights from Scaling LLM under Token-Crisis [50.31589712761807]
  Large language models (LLMs) are notoriously token-hungry during pre-training, and high-quality text data on the web is approaching its scaling limit for LLMs. We investigate the consequences of repeating pre-training data, revealing that the model is susceptible to overfitting. Second, we examine the key factors contributing to multi-epoch degradation, finding that significant factors include dataset size, model parameters, and training objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:02:15Z)
• Collaborative Intelligence Orchestration: Inconsistency-Based Fusion of Semi-Supervised Learning and Active Learning [60.26659373318915]
  Active learning (AL) and semi-supervised learning (SSL) are two effective, but often isolated, means to alleviate the data-hungry problem. We propose an innovative Inconsistency-based virtual aDvErial algorithm to further investigate SSL-AL's potential superiority. Two real-world case studies visualize the practical industrial value of applying and deploying the proposed data sampling algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T13:28:43Z)
• DATA: Domain-Aware and Task-Aware Pre-training [94.62676913928831]
  We present DATA, a simple yet effective NAS approach specialized for self-supervised learning (SSL) Our method achieves promising results across a wide range of computation costs on downstream tasks, including image classification, object detection and semantic segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T02:38:49Z)
• Self-supervised Learning is More Robust to Dataset Imbalance [65.84339596595383]
  We investigate self-supervised learning under dataset imbalance. Off-the-shelf self-supervised representations are already more robust to class imbalance than supervised representations. We devise a re-weighted regularization technique that consistently improves the SSL representation quality on imbalanced datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T06:29:56Z)
• Few-shot Learning via Dependency Maximization and Instance Discriminant Analysis [21.8311401851523]
  We study the few-shot learning problem, where a model learns to recognize new objects with extremely few labeled data per category. We propose a simple approach to exploit unlabeled data accompanying the few-shot task for improving few-shot performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T02:19:01Z)
• Dash: Semi-Supervised Learning with Dynamic Thresholding [72.74339790209531]
  We propose a semi-supervised learning (SSL) approach that uses unlabeled examples to train models. Our proposed approach, Dash, enjoys its adaptivity in terms of unlabeled data selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T23:52:29Z)
• Trash to Treasure: Harvesting OOD Data with Cross-Modal Matching for Open-Set Semi-Supervised Learning [101.28281124670647]
  Open-set semi-supervised learning (open-set SSL) investigates a challenging but practical scenario where out-of-distribution (OOD) samples are contained in the unlabeled data. We propose a novel training mechanism that could effectively exploit the presence of OOD data for enhanced feature learning. Our approach substantially lifts the performance on open-set SSL and outperforms the state-of-the-art by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-12T09:14:44Z)
• Self-Tuning for Data-Efficient Deep Learning [75.34320911480008]
  Self-Tuning is a novel approach to enable data-efficient deep learning. It unifies the exploration of labeled and unlabeled data and the transfer of a pre-trained model. It outperforms its SSL and TL counterparts on five tasks by sharp margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-25T14:56:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.