Explaining Neural Networks with Reasons

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14424v1
• Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 14:32:03 GMT
• Title: Explaining Neural Networks with Reasons
• Authors: Levin Hornischer, Hannes Leitgeb,
• Abstract summary: Our method computes a vector for each neuron, called its reasons vector.<n>We then can compute how strongly this reasons vector speaks for various propositions, e.g., the proposition that the input image depicts digit 2 or that the input prompt has a negative sentiment.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: We propose a new interpretability method for neural networks, which is based on a novel mathematico-philosophical theory of reasons. Our method computes a vector for each neuron, called its reasons vector. We then can compute how strongly this reasons vector speaks for various propositions, e.g., the proposition that the input image depicts digit 2 or that the input prompt has a negative sentiment. This yields an interpretation of neurons, and groups thereof, that combines a logical and a Bayesian perspective, and accounts for polysemanticity (i.e., that a single neuron can figure in multiple concepts). We show, both theoretically and empirically, that this method is: (1) grounded in a philosophically established notion of explanation, (2) uniform, i.e., applies to the common neural network architectures and modalities, (3) scalable, since computing reason vectors only involves forward-passes in the neural network, (4) faithful, i.e., intervening on a neuron based on its reason vector leads to expected changes in model output, (5) correct in that the model's reasons structure matches that of the data source, (6) trainable, i.e., neural networks can be trained to improve their reason strengths, (7) useful, i.e., it delivers on the needs for interpretability by increasing, e.g., robustness and fairness.

Related papers

• Optimisation in Neurosymbolic Learning Systems [1.450405446885067]
  We study neurosymbolic learning, where we have both data and background knowledge expressed using symbolic languages. Probabilistic reasoning is a natural fit for neural networks, which we usually train to be probabilistic. Our insight is to train a neural network with synthetic data to predict the result of probabilistic reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T17:09:32Z)
• Identifying Interpretable Visual Features in Artificial and Biological Neural Systems [3.604033202771937]
  Single neurons in neural networks are often interpretable in that they represent individual, intuitively meaningful features. Many neurons exhibit $textitmixed selectivity$, i.e., they represent multiple unrelated features. We propose an automated method for quantifying visual interpretability and an approach for finding meaningful directions in network activation space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T17:41:28Z)
• Disentangling Neuron Representations with Concept Vectors [0.0]
  The main contribution of this paper is a method to disentangle polysemantic neurons into concept vectors encapsulating distinct features. Our evaluations show that the concept vectors found encode coherent, human-understandable features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T14:55:31Z)
• Detecting Modularity in Deep Neural Networks [8.967870619902211]
  We consider the problem of assessing the modularity exhibited by a partitioning of a network's neurons. We propose two proxies for this: importance, which reflects how crucial sets of neurons are to network performance; and coherence, which reflects how consistently their neurons associate with features of the inputs. We show that these partitionings, even ones based only on weights, reveal groups of neurons that are important and coherent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T20:33:30Z)
• Dynamic Inference with Neural Interpreters [72.90231306252007]
  We present Neural Interpreters, an architecture that factorizes inference in a self-attention network as a system of modules. inputs to the model are routed through a sequence of functions in a way that is end-to-end learned. We show that Neural Interpreters perform on par with the vision transformer using fewer parameters, while being transferrable to a new task in a sample efficient manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T23:22:45Z)
• The Causal Neural Connection: Expressiveness, Learnability, and Inference [125.57815987218756]
  An object called structural causal model (SCM) represents a collection of mechanisms and sources of random variation of the system under investigation. In this paper, we show that the causal hierarchy theorem (Thm. 1, Bareinboim et al., 2020) still holds for neural models. We introduce a special type of SCM called a neural causal model (NCM), and formalize a new type of inductive bias to encode structural constraints necessary for performing causal inferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T01:55:18Z)
• And/or trade-off in artificial neurons: impact on adversarial robustness [91.3755431537592]
  Presence of sufficient number of OR-like neurons in a network can lead to classification brittleness and increased vulnerability to adversarial attacks. We define AND-like neurons and propose measures to increase their proportion in the network. Experimental results on the MNIST dataset suggest that our approach holds promise as a direction for further exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T08:19:05Z)
• The Neural Coding Framework for Learning Generative Models [91.0357317238509]
  We propose a novel neural generative model inspired by the theory of predictive processing in the brain. In a similar way, artificial neurons in our generative model predict what neighboring neurons will do, and adjust their parameters based on how well the predictions matched reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T01:20:38Z)
• Neuron-based explanations of neural networks sacrifice completeness and interpretability [67.53271920386851]
  We show that for AlexNet pretrained on ImageNet, neuron-based explanation methods sacrifice both completeness and interpretability.<n>We show the most important principal components provide more complete and interpretable explanations than the most important neurons.<n>Our findings suggest that explanation methods for networks like AlexNet should avoid using neurons as a basis for embeddings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-05T21:26:03Z)
• Compositional Explanations of Neurons [52.71742655312625]
  We describe a procedure for explaining neurons in deep representations by identifying compositional logical concepts. We use this procedure to answer several questions on interpretability in models for vision and natural language processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T20:37:05Z)
• Towards Understanding Hierarchical Learning: Benefits of Neural Representations [160.33479656108926]
  In this work, we demonstrate that intermediate neural representations add more flexibility to neural networks. We show that neural representation can achieve improved sample complexities compared with the raw input. Our results characterize when neural representations are beneficial, and may provide a new perspective on why depth is important in deep learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T02:44:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.