LLMSynthor: Macro-Aligned Micro-Records Synthesis with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14752v2
• Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 03:37:31 GMT
• Title: LLMSynthor: Macro-Aligned Micro-Records Synthesis with Large Language Models
• Authors: Yihong Tang, Menglin Kong, Junlin He, Tong Nie, Lijun Sun,
• Abstract summary: LLM Synthor is a macro-aware simulator that generates realistic micro-records consistent with target macro-statistics.<n>It iteratively builds synthetic datasets to minimize discrepancies between synthetic and target aggregates.<n>It achieves strong realism, statistical fidelity, and practical utility, making it broadly applicable to economics, social science, and urban studies.
• Score: 20.767947974005168
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Macro-aligned micro-records are crucial for credible simulations in social science and urban studies. For example, epidemic models are only reliable when individual-level mobility and contacts mirror real behavior, while aggregates match real-world statistics like case counts or travel flows. However, collecting such fine-grained data at scale is impractical, leaving researchers with only macro-level data. LLMSynthor addresses this by turning a pretrained LLM into a macro-aware simulator that generates realistic micro-records consistent with target macro-statistics. It iteratively builds synthetic datasets: in each step, the LLM generates batches of records to minimize discrepancies between synthetic and target aggregates. Treating the LLM as a nonparametric copula allows the model to capture realistic joint dependencies among variables. To improve efficiency, LLM Proposal Sampling guides the LLM to propose targeted record batches, specifying variable ranges and counts, to efficiently correct discrepancies while preserving realism grounded in the model's priors. Evaluations across domains (mobility, e-commerce, population) show that LLMSynthor achieves strong realism, statistical fidelity, and practical utility, making it broadly applicable to economics, social science, and urban studies.

Related papers

• What Language Models Know But Don't Say: Non-Generative Prior Extraction for Generalization [5.663538370244175]
  We propose LoID, a deterministic method for extracting informative prior distributions for Bayesian logistic regression.<n>Rather than relying on generated text, we probe the model's confidence in opposing semantic directions through carefully constructed sentences.<n>We evaluate LoID on ten real-world datasets under synthetic out-of-distribution (OOD) settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-24T22:05:01Z)
• LM4Opt-RA: A Multi-Candidate LLM Framework with Structured Ranking for Automating Network Resource Allocation [0.7933039558471408]
  We tackle complex analytical and mathematical reasoning tasks requiring nuanced contextual understanding.<n>Existing benchmarks datasets cannot address the complexities of such problems with dynamic environments, variables, and heterogeneous constraints.<n>We introduce NL4RA, a curated dataset comprising 50 resource allocation optimization problems formulated as LP, ILP, and MILP.<n>We then evaluate the performance of well-known open-source LLMs with varying parameter counts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T23:19:43Z)
• Realizing LLMs' Causal Potential Requires Science-Grounded, Novel Benchmarks [20.409472830397455]
  Recent claims of strong performance by Large Language Models (LLMs) on causal discovery are undermined by a key flaw: many evaluations rely on benchmarks likely included in pretraining corpora.<n>We challenge this narrative by asking: Do LLMs truly reason about causal structure, and how can we measure it without memorization concerns?<n>We argue that realizing LLMs' potential for causal analysis requires two shifts: (P.1) developing robust evaluation protocols based on recent scientific studies to guard against dataset leakage, and (P.2) designing hybrid methods that combine LLM-derived knowledge with data-driven statistics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T14:58:04Z)
• FASTGEN: Fast and Cost-Effective Synthetic Tabular Data Generation with LLMs [3.703188184729035]
  Synthetic data generation is an invaluable solution in scenarios where real-world data collection and usage are limited by cost and scarcity.<n>Existing approaches that directly use large language models to generate each record individually impose prohibitive time and cost burdens.<n>We propose a fast, cost-effective method for realistic tabular data synthesis that leverages LLMs to infer and encode each field's distribution into a reusable sampling script.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T17:51:46Z)
• Synthline: A Product Line Approach for Synthetic Requirements Engineering Data Generation using Large Language Models [0.5156484100374059]
  This paper introduces Synthline, a Product Line (PL) approach that leverages Large Language Models to generate synthetic Requirements Engineering (RE) data.<n>Our analysis reveals that while synthetic datasets exhibit less diversity than real data, they are good enough to serve as viable training resources.<n>Our evaluation shows that combining synthetic and real data leads to substantial performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T07:57:16Z)
• A Strategic Coordination Framework of Small LLMs Matches Large LLMs in Data Synthesis [43.746749403268275]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from high computational costs, environmental inefficiency, and potential biases inherited from monolithic architectures.<n>We propose a collaborative framework, GRA, that aggregates specialized roles across small LLMs to generate high-quality, diverse, and reliable data.<n>Our results challenge the necessity of monolithic large models for high-quality data synthesis, advocating instead for strategic coordination of smaller agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T06:13:43Z)
• Scaling Laws of Synthetic Data for Language Models [132.67350443447611]
  We introduce SynthLLM, a scalable framework that transforms pre-training corpora into diverse, high-quality synthetic datasets.<n>Our approach achieves this by automatically extracting and recombining high-level concepts across multiple documents using a graph algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T11:07:12Z)
• LLM-TabFlow: Synthetic Tabular Data Generation with Inter-column Logical Relationship Preservation [49.898152180805454]
  This study is the first to explicitly address inter-column relationship preservation in synthetic tabular data generation.<n>LLM-TabFlow is a novel approach that captures complex inter-column relationships and compress data, while using Score-based Diffusion to model the distribution of the compressed data in latent space.<n>Our results show that LLM-TabFlow outperforms all baselines, fully preserving inter-column relationships while achieving the best balance between data fidelity, utility, and privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T00:47:52Z)
• LLM-Lasso: A Robust Framework for Domain-Informed Feature Selection and Regularization [59.75242204923353]
  We introduce LLM-Lasso, a framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to guide feature selection in Lasso regression.<n>LLMs generate penalty factors for each feature, which are converted into weights for the Lasso penalty using a simple, tunable model.<n>Features identified as more relevant by the LLM receive lower penalties, increasing their likelihood of being retained in the final model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T02:55:22Z)
• Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judge [69.96778498636071]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) as judges and LLM-based data synthesis have emerged as two fundamental LLM-driven data annotation methods.<n>In this work, we expose preference leakage, a contamination problem in LLM-as-a-judge caused by the relatedness between the synthetic data generators and LLM-based evaluators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T17:13:03Z)
• Not All LLM-Generated Data Are Equal: Rethinking Data Weighting in Text Classification [7.357494019212501]
  We propose efficient weighted-loss approaches to align synthetic data with real-world distribution.<n>We empirically assessed the effectiveness of our method on multiple text classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T20:53:49Z)
• Why LLMs Are Bad at Synthetic Table Generation (and what to do about it) [11.266896863556124]
  Synthetic data generation is integral to ML pipelines, e.g., to augment training data, replace sensitive information, and even to power advanced platforms like DeepSeek.<n>While LLMs fine-tuned for synthetic data generation are gaining traction, synthetic table generation remains under-explored compared to text and image synthesis.<n>This paper shows that LLMs, whether used as-is or after traditional fine-tuning, are inadequate for generating synthetic tables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:52:29Z)
• Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models [89.88010750772413]
  Synthetic data has been proposed as a solution to address the issue of high-quality data scarcity in the training of large language models (LLMs) Our work delves into these specific flaws associated with question-answer (Q-A) pairs, a prevalent type of synthetic data, and presents a method based on unlearning techniques to mitigate these flaws. Our work has yielded key insights into the effective use of synthetic data, aiming to promote more robust and efficient LLM training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T08:38:59Z)
• Synthetic Oversampling: Theory and A Practical Approach Using LLMs to Address Data Imbalance [16.047084318753377]
  Imbalanced classification and spurious correlation are common challenges in data science and machine learning.<n>Recent advances have proposed leveraging the flexibility and generative capabilities of large language models to generate synthetic samples.<n>This article develops novel theoretical foundations to systematically study the roles of synthetic samples in addressing imbalanced classification and spurious correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T21:24:26Z)
• Curated LLM: Synergy of LLMs and Data Curation for tabular augmentation in low-data regimes [57.62036621319563]
  We introduce CLLM, which leverages the prior knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs) for data augmentation in the low-data regime. We demonstrate the superior performance of CLLM in the low-data regime compared to conventional generators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T12:34:46Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)
• MLLM-DataEngine: An Iterative Refinement Approach for MLLM [62.30753425449056]
  We propose a novel closed-loop system that bridges data generation, model training, and evaluation. Within each loop, the MLLM-DataEngine first analyze the weakness of the model based on the evaluation results. For targeting, we propose an Adaptive Bad-case Sampling module, which adjusts the ratio of different types of data. For quality, we resort to GPT-4 to generate high-quality data with each given data type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T01:41:04Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• CAFE: Learning to Condense Dataset by Aligning Features [72.99394941348757]
  We propose a novel scheme to Condense dataset by Aligning FEatures (CAFE) At the heart of our approach is an effective strategy to align features from the real and synthetic data across various scales. We validate the proposed CAFE across various datasets, and demonstrate that it generally outperforms the state of the art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T05:58:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.