R-TOFU: Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15214v2
• Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 07:37:47 GMT
• Title: R-TOFU: Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models
• Authors: Sangyeon Yoon, Wonje Jeung, Albert No,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Reasoning-TOFU, the first benchmark tailored to this setting.<n>R-TOFU augments existing unlearning tasks with realistic CoT annotations.<n>We propose Reasoned IDK, a preference-optimization variant that preserves coherent yet inconclusive reasoning.
• Score: 5.116399056871577
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) embed private or copyrighted information not only in their final answers but also throughout multi-step chain-of-thought (CoT) traces, making reliable unlearning far more demanding than in standard LLMs. We introduce Reasoning-TOFU (R-TOFU), the first benchmark tailored to this setting. R-TOFU augments existing unlearning tasks with realistic CoT annotations and provides step-wise metrics that expose residual knowledge invisible to answer-level checks. Using R-TOFU, we carry out a comprehensive comparison of gradient-based and preference-optimization baselines and show that conventional answer-only objectives leave substantial forget traces in reasoning. We further propose Reasoned IDK, a preference-optimization variant that preserves coherent yet inconclusive reasoning, achieving a stronger balance between forgetting efficacy and model utility than earlier refusal styles. Finally, we identify a failure mode: decoding variants such as ZeroThink and LessThink can still reveal forgotten content despite seemingly successful unlearning, emphasizing the need to evaluate models under diverse decoding settings. Together, the benchmark, analysis, and new baseline establish a systematic foundation for studying and improving unlearning in LRMs while preserving their reasoning capabilities.

Related papers

• Post-Training Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback [3.73824942136665]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce plausible but poorly-calibrated answers.<n>We present Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback (RLSF), a post-training stage that uses the model's own confidence as an intrinsic reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T15:46:26Z)
• Verifying the Verifiers: Unveiling Pitfalls and Potentials in Fact Verifiers [59.168391398830515]
  We evaluate 12 pre-trained LLMs and one specialized fact-verifier, using a collection of examples from 14 fact-checking benchmarks.<n>We highlight the importance of addressing annotation errors and ambiguity in datasets.<n> frontier LLMs with few-shot in-context examples, often overlooked in previous works, achieve top-tier performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T10:32:10Z)
• Reasoning Model Unlearning: Forgetting Traces, Not Just Answers, While Preserving Reasoning Skills [32.96074934023323]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) have enabled strong chain-of-thought (CoT) generation through test-time computation.<n>We show that conventional unlearning algorithms, originally designed for non-reasoning models, are inadequate for LRMs.<n>We propose Reasoning-aware Representation Misdirection for Unlearning ($R2MU$), a novel method that effectively suppresses sensitive reasoning traces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-15T20:54:23Z)
• What makes Reasoning Models Different? Follow the Reasoning Leader for Efficient Decoding [84.42056293290015]
  We analyze the token-level misalignment between reasoning and non-reasoning models.<n>Motivated by the Local Misalignment Diminish, we propose FoReaL-Decoding.<n>On four popular math-reasoning benchmarks, FoReaL-Decoding reduces theoretical FLOPs by 30 to 50% and trims CoT length by up to 40%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-08T05:08:32Z)
• ReaRAG: Knowledge-guided Reasoning Enhances Factuality of Large Reasoning Models with Iterative Retrieval Augmented Generation [38.64751082999587]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) exhibit remarkable reasoning abilities but rely primarily on parametric knowledge, limiting factual accuracy.<n>We propose ReaRAG, a factuality-enhanced reasoning model that explores diverse queries without excessive iterations.<n>Our study enhances LRMs' factuality while effectively integrating robust reasoning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T17:44:18Z)
• The First Few Tokens Are All You Need: An Efficient and Effective Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning Method for Reasoning Models [69.798277882245]
  We introduce Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning (UPFT) to enhance large language models' reasoning efficiency.<n>UPFT removes the need for labeled data or exhaustive sampling.<n> Experiments show that UPFT matches the performance of supervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T18:56:03Z)
• Reinforcing Thinking through Reasoning-Enhanced Reward Models [6.636512424910708]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit great potential in complex multi-step reasoning through inference-time thinking.<n>LLMs struggle with deciding when to stop thinking due to limited self-awareness about their knowledge boundaries.<n>This work addresses these challenges by distilling the LLM's own reasoning processes into synthetic behavioral data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-31T04:50:15Z)
• An Early FIRST Reproduction and Improvements to Single-Token Decoding for Fast Listwise Reranking [50.81324768683995]
  FIRST is a novel approach that integrates a learning-to-rank objective and leveraging the logits of only the first generated token. We extend the evaluation of FIRST to the TREC Deep Learning datasets (DL19-22), validating its robustness across diverse domains. Our experiments confirm that fast reranking with single-token logits does not compromise out-of-domain reranking quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T12:08:17Z)
• Improve Vision Language Model Chain-of-thought Reasoning [86.83335752119741]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in vision language models (VLMs) is crucial for improving interpretability and trustworthiness. We show that training VLM on short answers does not generalize well to reasoning tasks that require more detailed responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T17:00:06Z)
• Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning [27.991291785091736]
  This work studies the problem of large language model (LLM) unlearning, aiming to remove unwanted data influences.<n>Despite the increasing demand for unlearning, a technically-grounded optimization framework is lacking.<n>We propose a simple yet effective unlearning optimization framework, called SimNPO, showing that simplicity' in removing the reliance on a reference model benefits unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:58:12Z)
• Wait, that's not an option: LLMs Robustness with Incorrect Multiple-Choice Options [2.1184929769291294]
  This work introduces a novel framework for evaluating LLMs' capacity to balance instruction-following with critical reasoning.<n>We show that post-training aligned models often default to selecting invalid options, while base models exhibit improved refusal capabilities that scale with model size.<n>We additionally conduct a parallel human study showing similar instruction-following biases, with implications for how these biases may propagate through human feedback datasets used in alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T19:27:43Z)
• Belief Revision: The Adaptability of Large Language Models Reasoning [63.0281286287648]
  We introduce Belief-R, a new dataset designed to test LMs' belief revision ability when presented with new evidence. Inspired by how humans suppress prior inferences, this task assesses LMs within the newly proposed delta reasoning framework. We evaluate $sim$30 LMs across diverse prompting strategies and found that LMs generally struggle to appropriately revise their beliefs in response to new information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T09:09:36Z)
• Remembering for the Right Reasons: Explanations Reduce Catastrophic Forgetting [100.75479161884935]
  We propose a novel training paradigm called Remembering for the Right Reasons (RRR) RRR stores visual model explanations for each example in the buffer and ensures the model has "the right reasons" for its predictions. We demonstrate how RRR can be easily added to any memory or regularization-based approach and results in reduced forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T10:05:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.