MentalMAC: Enhancing Large Language Models for Detecting Mental Manipulation via Multi-Task Anti-Curriculum Distillation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15255v2
• Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 09:13:57 GMT
• Title: MentalMAC: Enhancing Large Language Models for Detecting Mental Manipulation via Multi-Task Anti-Curriculum Distillation
• Authors: Yuansheng Gao, Han Bao, Tong Zhang, Bin Li, Zonghui Wang, Wenzhi Chen,
• Abstract summary: Mental manipulation is a subtle yet pervasive form of psychological abuse that poses serious threats to mental health.<n>MentalMAC is a multi-task anti-curriculum distillation method that enhances LLMs' ability to detect mental manipulation in multi-turn dialogue.<n>Our approach includes: (i) EvoSA, an unsupervised data expansion method based on evolutionary operations and speech act theory; (ii) teacher model-generated multi-task supervision; and (iii) progressive knowledge distillation from complex to simpler tasks.
• Score: 12.845142027768881
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Mental manipulation is a subtle yet pervasive form of psychological abuse that poses serious threats to mental health. Its covert nature and the complexity of manipulation strategies make it challenging to detect, even for state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs). This concealment also hinders the manual collection of large-scale, high-quality annotations essential for training effective models. Although recent efforts have sought to improve LLMs' performance on this task, progress remains limited due to the scarcity of real-world annotated datasets. To address these challenges, we propose MentalMAC, a multi-task anti-curriculum distillation method that enhances LLMs' ability to detect mental manipulation in multi-turn dialogue. Our approach includes: (i) EvoSA, an unsupervised data expansion method based on evolutionary operations and speech act theory; (ii) teacher model-generated multi-task supervision; and (iii) progressive knowledge distillation from complex to simpler tasks. We then constructed the ReaMent dataset with 5,000 real-world dialogue samples, using a MentalMAC-distilled model to assist human annotation. Vast experiments demonstrate that our method significantly narrows the gap between student and teacher models and outperforms competitive LLMs across key evaluation metrics. All code, datasets, and checkpoints will be released upon paper acceptance. Warning: This paper contains content that may be offensive to readers.

Related papers

• Self-Foveate: Enhancing Diversity and Difficulty of Synthesized Instructions from Unsupervised Text via Multi-Level Foveation [19.913806733495488]
  Large language models (LLMs) with instruction following capabilities have demonstrated impressive problem-solving abilities.<n> conventional methods rely heavily on human effort for data annotation.<n>We propose Self-Foveate, an innovative LLM-driven method for instruction synthesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T11:18:42Z)
• Satori: Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Action-Thought Enhances LLM Reasoning via Autoregressive Search [57.28671084993782]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities across diverse domains.<n>Recent studies have shown that increasing test-time computation enhances LLMs' reasoning capabilities.<n>We propose a two-stage training paradigm: 1) a small-scale format tuning stage to internalize the COAT reasoning format and 2) a large-scale self-improvement stage leveraging reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T17:26:58Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• Unified Generative and Discriminative Training for Multi-modal Large Language Models [88.84491005030316]
  Generative training has enabled Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to tackle various complex tasks. Discriminative training, exemplified by models like CLIP, excels in zero-shot image-text classification and retrieval. This paper proposes a unified approach that integrates the strengths of both paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T01:51:31Z)
• Iter-AHMCL: Alleviate Hallucination for Large Language Model via Iterative Model-level Contrastive Learning [16.883679810267342]
  Iterative Model-level Contrastive Learning (Iter-AHMCL) to address hallucination. This paper introduces a novel approach called Iterative Model-level Contrastive Learning (Iter-AHMCL) to address hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T00:15:40Z)
• From Linguistic Giants to Sensory Maestros: A Survey on Cross-Modal Reasoning with Large Language Models [56.9134620424985]
  Cross-modal reasoning (CMR) is increasingly recognized as a crucial capability in the progression toward more sophisticated artificial intelligence systems. The recent trend of deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle CMR tasks has marked a new mainstream of approaches for enhancing their effectiveness. This survey offers a nuanced exposition of current methodologies applied in CMR using LLMs, classifying these into a detailed three-tiered taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T02:51:54Z)
• Self-training Large Language Models through Knowledge Detection [26.831873737733737]
  Large language models (LLMs) often necessitate extensive labeled datasets and training compute to achieve impressive performance across downstream tasks. This paper explores a self-training paradigm, where the LLM autonomously curates its own labels and selectively trains on unknown data samples. Empirical evaluations demonstrate significant improvements in reducing hallucination in generation across multiple subjects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T07:25:09Z)
• MentalManip: A Dataset For Fine-grained Analysis of Mental Manipulation in Conversations [41.661208833153225]
  Mental manipulation is a significant form of abuse in interpersonal conversations. Our study introduces a new dataset, named $rm Msmall entalMsmall anip$, which consists of $4,000$ annotated movie dialogues. This dataset enables a comprehensive analysis of mental manipulation, pinpointing both the techniques utilized for manipulation and the vulnerabilities targeted in victims.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T14:27:48Z)
• UNDIAL: Self-Distillation with Adjusted Logits for Robust Unlearning in Large Language Models [12.45822383965784]
  We introduce UnDIAL (Unlearning via Self-Distillation on Adjusted Logits), a novel and robust unlearning method. Our approach leverages self-distillation to adjust logits and selectively reduce the influence of targeted tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T16:21:14Z)
• Prompt Highlighter: Interactive Control for Multi-Modal LLMs [50.830448437285355]
  This study targets a critical aspect of multi-modal LLMs' (LLMs&VLMs) inference: explicit controllable text generation. We introduce a novel inference method, Prompt Highlighter, which enables users to highlight specific prompt spans to interactively control the focus during generation. We find that, during inference, guiding the models with highlighted tokens through the attention weights leads to more desired outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T13:53:29Z)
• Unlearn What You Want to Forget: Efficient Unlearning for LLMs [92.51670143929056]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant progress from pre-training on and memorizing a wide range of textual data. This process might suffer from privacy issues and violations of data protection regulations. We propose an efficient unlearning framework that could efficiently update LLMs without having to retrain the whole model after data removals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T03:35:59Z)
• MA2CL:Masked Attentive Contrastive Learning for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [128.19212716007794]
  We propose an effective framework called textbfMulti-textbfAgent textbfMasked textbfAttentive textbfContrastive textbfLearning (MA2CL) MA2CL encourages learning representation to be both temporal and agent-level predictive by reconstructing the masked agent observation in latent space. Our method significantly improves the performance and sample efficiency of different MARL algorithms and outperforms other methods in various vision-based and state-based scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T05:32:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.