A Participatory Strategy for AI Ethics in Education and Rehabilitation grounded in the Capability Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15466v1
• Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 12:45:01 GMT
• Title: A Participatory Strategy for AI Ethics in Education and Rehabilitation grounded in the Capability Approach
• Authors: Valeria Cesaroni, Eleonora Pasqua, Piercosma Bisconti, Martina Galletti,
• Abstract summary: AI can enhance learning experiences, empower students, and support both teachers and rehabilitators.<n>However, their usage presents challenges that require a systemic-ecological vision, ethical considerations, and participatory research.
• Score: 1.2187048691454239
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI-based technologies have significant potential to enhance inclusive education and clinical-rehabilitative contexts for children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities. AI can enhance learning experiences, empower students, and support both teachers and rehabilitators. However, their usage presents challenges that require a systemic-ecological vision, ethical considerations, and participatory research. Therefore, research and technological development must be rooted in a strong ethical-theoretical framework. The Capability Approach - a theoretical model of disability, human vulnerability, and inclusion - offers a more relevant perspective on functionality, effectiveness, and technological adequacy in inclusive learning environments. In this paper, we propose a participatory research strategy with different stakeholders through a case study on the ARTIS Project, which develops an AI-enriched interface to support children with text comprehension difficulties. Our research strategy integrates ethical, educational, clinical, and technological expertise in designing and implementing AI-based technologies for children's learning environments through focus groups and collaborative design sessions. We believe that this holistic approach to AI adoption in education can help bridge the gap between technological innovation and ethical responsibility.

Related papers

• Whole-Person Education for AI Engineers [0.7895785395897614]
  The study identifies key motivations driving the call for change in AI engineering education.<n>The findings challenge the myths of technological neutrality and technosaviourism.<n>The study provides valuable insights and recommendations for transforming AI engineering education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T19:03:31Z)
• Innovative Tangible Interactive Games for Enhancing Artificial Intelligence Knowledge and Literacy in Elementary Education: A Pedagogical Framework [0.0]
  This paper presents an innovative framework employing tangible interactive games to enhance artificial intelligence (AI) knowledge and literacy.<n> Recognizing the growing importance of AI competencies in the 21st century, this study addresses the critical need for age-appropriate, experiential learning tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-31T17:40:30Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Advancing Education through Tutoring Systems: A Systematic Literature Review [3.276010440333338]
  This study systematically reviews the transformative role of Tutoring Systems, encompassing Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) and Robot Tutoring Systems (RTS)<n>The findings reveal significant advancements in AI techniques that enhance adaptability, engagement, and learning outcomes.<n>The study highlights the complementary strengths of ITS and RTS, proposing integrated hybrid solutions to maximize educational benefits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T18:47:07Z)
• What is Ethical: AIHED Driving Humans or Human-Driven AIHED? A Conceptual Framework enabling the Ethos of AI-driven Higher education [0.6216023343793144]
  This study introduces the Human-Driven AI in Higher Education (HD-AIHED) Framework to ensure compliance with UNESCO and OECD ethical standards.<n>The study applies a participatory co-system, Phased Human Intelligence, SWOC analysis, and AI ethical review boards to assess AI readiness and governance strategies for universities and HE institutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T11:13:31Z)
• Navigating Ethical Challenges in Generative AI-Enhanced Research: The ETHICAL Framework for Responsible Generative AI Use [0.0]
  The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in research presents both opportunities and ethical challenges.<n>This paper develops the ETHICAL framework, which is a practical guide for responsible GenAI use in research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T05:49:11Z)
• Responding to Generative AI Technologies with Research-through-Design: The Ryelands AI Lab as an Exploratory Study [6.028558240668647]
  We partner with a primary school to develop a constructionist curriculum centered on students interacting with a generative AI technology. We provide a detailed account of the design of and outputs from the curriculum and learning materials, finding centrally that the reflexive and prolonged hands-on' approach led to a co-development of students' practical and critical competencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T21:34:10Z)
• From Algorithm Worship to the Art of Human Learning: Insights from 50-year journey of AI in Education [0.0]
  Current discourse surrounding Artificial Intelligence (AI) oscillates between hope and apprehension. This paper delves into the complexities of AI's role in Education, addressing the mixed messages that have both enthused and alarmed educators. It explores the promises that AI holds for enhancing learning through personalisation at scale, against the backdrop of concerns about ethical implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T16:12:14Z)
• Bringing Generative AI to Adaptive Learning in Education [58.690250000579496]
  We shed light on the intersectional studies of generative AI and adaptive learning. We argue that this union will contribute significantly to the development of the next-stage learning format in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T23:54:51Z)
• Toward enriched Cognitive Learning with XAI [44.99833362998488]
  We introduce an intelligent system (CL-XAI) for Cognitive Learning which is supported by artificial intelligence (AI) tools. The use of CL-XAI is illustrated with a game-inspired virtual use case where learners tackle problems to enhance problem-solving skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T16:13:47Z)
• The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice [64.29355073494125]
  This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation. We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T05:30:42Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.