Safe Uncertainty-Aware Learning of Robotic Suturing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16596v1
• Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 12:31:18 GMT
• Title: Safe Uncertainty-Aware Learning of Robotic Suturing
• Authors: Wilbert Peter Empleo, Yitaek Kim, Hansoul Kim, Thiusius Rajeeth Savarimuthu, Iñigo Iturrate,
• Abstract summary: Minimal-Assistedly Invasive Surgery is currently fully manually controlled by a trained surgeon.<n>Recent works have utilized Artificial Intelligence methods, which show promising adaptability.<n>This paper presents a framework for a safe, uncertainty-aware learning method.
• Score: 0.7864304771129751
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery is currently fully manually controlled by a trained surgeon. Automating this has great potential for alleviating issues, e.g., physical strain, highly repetitive tasks, and shortages of trained surgeons. For these reasons, recent works have utilized Artificial Intelligence methods, which show promising adaptability. Despite these advances, there is skepticism of these methods because they lack explainability and robust safety guarantees. This paper presents a framework for a safe, uncertainty-aware learning method. We train an Ensemble Model of Diffusion Policies using expert demonstrations of needle insertion. Using an Ensemble model, we can quantify the policy's epistemic uncertainty, which is used to determine Out-Of-Distribution scenarios. This allows the system to release control back to the surgeon in the event of an unsafe scenario. Additionally, we implement a model-free Control Barrier Function to place formal safety guarantees on the predicted action. We experimentally evaluate our proposed framework using a state-of-the-art robotic suturing simulator. We evaluate multiple scenarios, such as dropping the needle, moving the camera, and moving the phantom. The learned policy is robust to these perturbations, showing corrective behaviors and generalization, and it is possible to detect Out-Of-Distribution scenarios. We further demonstrate that the Control Barrier Function successfully limits the action to remain within our specified safety set in the case of unsafe predictions.

Related papers

• Safely Learning Controlled Stochastic Dynamics [61.82896036131116]
  We introduce a method that ensures safe exploration and efficient estimation of system dynamics.<n>After training, the learned model enables predictions of the system's dynamics and permits safety verification of any given control.<n>We provide theoretical guarantees for safety and derive adaptive learning rates that improve with increasing Sobolev regularity of the true dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T11:17:07Z)
• Designing Control Barrier Function via Probabilistic Enumeration for Safe Reinforcement Learning Navigation [55.02966123945644]
  We propose a hierarchical control framework leveraging neural network verification techniques to design control barrier functions (CBFs) and policy correction mechanisms.<n>Our approach relies on probabilistic enumeration to identify unsafe regions of operation, which are then used to construct a safe CBF-based control layer.<n>These experiments demonstrate the ability of the proposed solution to correct unsafe actions while preserving efficient navigation behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T13:47:25Z)
• Safe Vision-Language Models via Unsafe Weights Manipulation [75.04426753720551]
  We revise safety evaluation by introducing Safe-Ground, a new set of metrics that evaluate safety at different levels of granularity.<n>We take a different direction and explore whether it is possible to make a model safer without training, introducing Unsafe Weights Manipulation (UWM)<n>UWM uses a calibration set of safe and unsafe instances to compare activations between safe and unsafe content, identifying the most important parameters for processing the latter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T17:00:22Z)
• Deception Game: Closing the Safety-Learning Loop in Interactive Robot Autonomy [7.915956857741506]
  Existing safety methods often neglect the robot's ability to learn and adapt at runtime, leading to overly conservative behavior. This paper proposes a new closed-loop paradigm for synthesizing safe control policies that explicitly account for the robot's evolving uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-03T20:34:01Z)
• Safety Margins for Reinforcement Learning [53.10194953873209]
  We show how to leverage proxy criticality metrics to generate safety margins. We evaluate our approach on learned policies from APE-X and A3C within an Atari environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T16:49:54Z)
• Safe Exploration Method for Reinforcement Learning under Existence of Disturbance [1.1470070927586016]
  We deal with a safe exploration problem in reinforcement learning under the existence of disturbance. We propose a safe exploration method that uses partial prior knowledge of a controlled object and disturbance. We illustrate the validity and effectiveness of the proposed method through numerical simulations of an inverted pendulum and a four-bar parallel link robot manipulator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T13:00:33Z)
• Recursively Feasible Probabilistic Safe Online Learning with Control Barrier Functions [60.26921219698514]
  We introduce a model-uncertainty-aware reformulation of CBF-based safety-critical controllers. We then present the pointwise feasibility conditions of the resulting safety controller. We use these conditions to devise an event-triggered online data collection strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T05:02:09Z)
• ProBF: Learning Probabilistic Safety Certificates with Barrier Functions [31.203344483485843]
  The control barrier function is a useful tool to guarantee safety if we have access to the ground-truth system dynamics. In practice, we have inaccurate knowledge of the system dynamics, which can lead to unsafe behaviors. We show the efficacy of this method through experiments on Segway and Quadrotor simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T20:18:18Z)
• Learn Zero-Constraint-Violation Policy in Model-Free Constrained Reinforcement Learning [7.138691584246846]
  We propose the safe set actor-critic (SSAC) algorithm, which confines the policy update using safety-oriented energy functions. The safety index is designed to increase rapidly for potentially dangerous actions. We claim that we can learn the energy function in a model-free manner similar to learning a value function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T07:24:30Z)
• Learning to Be Cautious [47.92658607280631]
  It is impossible to anticipate all situations that an autonomous system may face or what behavior would best avoid bad outcomes.<n>Current approaches typically embed task-specific safety information or explicit cautious behaviors into the system.<n>We present a sequence of tasks where cautious behavior becomes increasingly non-obvious, as well as an algorithm to demonstrate that it is possible for a system to learn to be cautious.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T16:52:45Z)
• Sample-Efficient Safety Assurances using Conformal Prediction [57.92013073974406]
  Early warning systems can provide alerts when an unsafe situation is imminent. To reliably improve safety, these warning systems should have a provable false negative rate. We present a framework that combines a statistical inference technique known as conformal prediction with a simulator of robot/environment dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T23:00:30Z)
• Driving Through Ghosts: Behavioral Cloning with False Positives [42.31740099795908]
  We propose a behavioral cloning approach that can safely leverage imperfect perception without being conservative. We propose a new probabilistic birds-eye-view semantic grid to encode the noisy output of object perception systems. We then leverage expert demonstrations to learn an imitative driving policy using this probabilistic representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-29T12:10:23Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning via Curriculum Induction [94.67835258431202]
  In safety-critical applications, autonomous agents may need to learn in an environment where mistakes can be very costly. Existing safe reinforcement learning methods make an agent rely on priors that let it avoid dangerous situations. This paper presents an alternative approach inspired by human teaching, where an agent learns under the supervision of an automatic instructor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T10:48:17Z)
• Safe reinforcement learning for probabilistic reachability and safety specifications: A Lyapunov-based approach [2.741266294612776]
  We propose a model-free safety specification method that learns the maximal probability of safe operation. Our approach constructs a Lyapunov function with respect to a safe policy to restrain each policy improvement stage. It yields a sequence of safe policies that determine the range of safe operation, called the safe set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-24T09:20:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.