BEDI: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Embodied Agents on UAVs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18229v1
• Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 12:14:00 GMT
• Title: BEDI: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Embodied Agents on UAVs
• Authors: Mingning Guo, Mengwei Wu, Jiarun He, Shaoxian Li, Haifeng Li, Chao Tao,
• Abstract summary: Embodied Agents based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have shown significant potential in autonomous tasks.<n>Current evaluation methods for UAV-Embodied Agents (UAV-EAs) remain constrained by the lack of standardized benchmarks.<n>We propose BEDI (Benchmark for Embodied Drone Intelligence), a systematic and standardized benchmark designed for evaluating UAV-EAs.
• Score: 3.239200269731315
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the rapid advancement of low-altitude remote sensing and Vision-Language Models (VLMs), Embodied Agents based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have shown significant potential in autonomous tasks. However, current evaluation methods for UAV-Embodied Agents (UAV-EAs) remain constrained by the lack of standardized benchmarks, diverse testing scenarios and open system interfaces. To address these challenges, we propose BEDI (Benchmark for Embodied Drone Intelligence), a systematic and standardized benchmark designed for evaluating UAV-EAs. Specifically, we introduce a novel Dynamic Chain-of-Embodied-Task paradigm based on the perception-decision-action loop, which decomposes complex UAV tasks into standardized, measurable subtasks. Building on this paradigm, we design a unified evaluation framework encompassing five core sub-skills: semantic perception, spatial perception, motion control, tool utilization, and task planning. Furthermore, we construct a hybrid testing platform that integrates static real-world environments with dynamic virtual scenarios, enabling comprehensive performance assessment of UAV-EAs across varied contexts. The platform also offers open and standardized interfaces, allowing researchers to customize tasks and extend scenarios, thereby enhancing flexibility and scalability in the evaluation process. Finally, through empirical evaluations of several state-of-the-art (SOTA) VLMs, we reveal their limitations in embodied UAV tasks, underscoring the critical role of the BEDI benchmark in advancing embodied intelligence research and model optimization. By filling the gap in systematic and standardized evaluation within this field, BEDI facilitates objective model comparison and lays a robust foundation for future development in this field. Our benchmark will be released at https://github.com/lostwolves/BEDI .

Related papers

• AI-NativeBench: An Open-Source White-Box Agentic Benchmark Suite for AI-Native Systems [52.65695508605237]
  We introduce AI-NativeBench, the first application-centric and white-box AI-Native benchmark suite grounded in Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Agent-to-Agent (A2A) standards.<n>By treating agentic spans as first-class citizens within distributed traces, our methodology enables granular analysis of engineering characteristics beyond simple capabilities.<n>This work provides the first systematic evidence to guide the transition from measuring model capability to engineering reliable AI-Native systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T11:32:07Z)
• Beyond Task Completion: An Assessment Framework for Evaluating Agentic AI Systems [0.0]
  Recent advances in agentic AI have shifted the focus from standalone Large Language Models to integrated systems.<n>We propose an end-to-end Agent Assessment Framework with four evaluation pillars encompassing LLMs, Memory, Tools, and Environment.<n>We validate the framework on a representative Autonomous CloudOps use case, where experiments reveal behavioral deviations by conventional metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T18:17:40Z)
• AerialMind: Towards Referring Multi-Object Tracking in UAV Scenarios [64.51320327698231]
  We introduce AerialMind, the first large-scale RMOT benchmark in UAV scenarios.<n>We develop an innovative semi-automated collaborative agent-based labeling assistant framework.<n>We also propose HawkEyeTrack, a novel method that collaboratively enhances vision-language representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T04:44:27Z)
• UAVBench: An Open Benchmark Dataset for Autonomous and Agentic AI UAV Systems via LLM-Generated Flight Scenarios [3.099103925863002]
  UAVBench is an open benchmarking benchmark for UAV flight scenarios generated through large language models (LLMs)<n>We present UAVBench_MCQ, a reasoning-oriented extension containing 50,000 multiple-choice questions spanning ten cognitive and ethical reasoning styles.<n>We evaluate 32 state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT-5, ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Q3wenwenB, and ERNIE 4.5 300B, and find strong performance in perception and policy reasoning but persistent challenges in ethics-aware and resource-constrained decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-14T12:51:48Z)
• MetAdv: A Unified and Interactive Adversarial Testing Platform for Autonomous Driving [85.04826012938642]
  MetAdv is a novel adversarial testing platform that enables realistic, dynamic, and interactive evaluation.<n>It supports flexible 3D vehicle modeling and seamless transitions between simulated and physical environments.<n>It enables real-time capture of physiological signals and behavioral feedback from drivers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T03:07:54Z)
• UAV-ON: A Benchmark for Open-World Object Goal Navigation with Aerial Agents [5.414995940540323]
  UAV-ON is a benchmark for large-scale Object Goal Navigation (NavObject) by aerial agents in open-world environments.<n>It comprises 14 high-fidelity Unreal Engine environments with diverse semantic regions and complex spatial layouts.<n>It defines 1270 annotated target objects, each characterized by an instance-level instruction that encodes category, physical footprint, and visual descriptors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T03:23:06Z)
• XBOUND: Exploring Capability Boundaries of Device-Control Agents at the State Level [43.73689966281675]
  Device-Control Agents (DC agents) manage graphical user interfaces (GUIs)<n>We propose a new evaluation method, XBOUND, to evaluate the accuracy of instruction completion on a per-state basis.<n>Our evaluation yields several key insights: UI-TARS stands out as the strongest 7B model, current agents display a bimodal performance pattern in instruction unification, and sub-7B models remain limited in state mastery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T14:49:30Z)
• Hierarchical Instruction-aware Embodied Visual Tracking [35.73851196966425]
  User-Centric Embodied Visual Tracking (UC-EVT) presents a novel challenge for reinforcement learning-based models.<n>We propose textbf Instruction-aware Embodied Visual Tracking (HIEVT) agent, which bridges instruction comprehension and action generation using textitspatial goals as intermediaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T04:36:26Z)
• More Clear, More Flexible, More Precise: A Comprehensive Oriented Object Detection benchmark for UAV [58.89234732689013]
  CODrone is a comprehensive oriented object detection dataset for UAVs that accurately reflects real-world conditions.<n>It also serves as a new benchmark designed to align with downstream task requirements.<n>We conduct a series of experiments based on 22 classical or SOTA methods to rigorously evaluate CODrone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T17:56:02Z)
• Securing the Skies: A Comprehensive Survey on Anti-UAV Methods, Benchmarking, and Future Directions [22.160090947392344]
  Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are indispensable for infrastructure inspection, surveillance, and related tasks, yet they also introduce critical security challenges.<n>This survey provides a wide-ranging examination of the anti-UAV domain, centering on three core objectives-classification, detection, and tracking.<n>We systematically evaluate state-of-the-art solutions across both single-modality and multi-sensor pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T10:58:33Z)
• AIGVE-Tool: AI-Generated Video Evaluation Toolkit with Multifaceted Benchmark [8.827755848017578]
  Existing metrics lack a unified framework for systematically categorizing methodologies.<n>We introduce AIGVE-Tool, a unified framework that provides a structured taxonomy and evaluation pipeline for AI-generated video evaluation.<n>A large-scale benchmark dataset is created with five SOTA video generation models based on hand-crafted instructions and prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T09:36:33Z)
• The BrowserGym Ecosystem for Web Agent Research [151.90034093362343]
  BrowserGym ecosystem addresses the growing need for efficient evaluation and benchmarking of web agents.<n>We propose an extended BrowserGym-based ecosystem for web agent research, which unifies existing benchmarks from the literature.<n>We conduct the first large-scale, multi-benchmark web agent experiment and compare the performance of 6 state-of-the-art LLMs across 6 popular web agent benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T23:43:59Z)
• TestAgent: A Framework for Domain-Adaptive Evaluation of LLMs via Dynamic Benchmark Construction and Exploratory Interaction [29.72874725703848]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed to various vertical domains.<n>Current evaluation methods rely on static and resource-intensive datasets that are not aligned with real-world requirements.<n>We introduce two key concepts: textbfBenchmark+, which extends the traditional question-answer benchmark into a more flexible strategy-criterion'' format.<n>We propose textbftextscTestAgent, an agent-based evaluation framework that implements these concepts using retrieval-augmented generation and reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T11:20:42Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction.<n>Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results.<n>However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges.<n>This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrology [76.64402390208576]
  Modern language models (LMs) pose a new challenge in capability assessment. To be confident in our metrics, we need a new discipline of model metrology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T17:52:12Z)
• A Requirements-Driven Platform for Validating Field Operations of Small Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles [48.67061953896227]
  DroneReqValidator (DRV) allows sUAS developers to define the operating context, configure multi-sUAS mission requirements, specify safety properties, and deploy their own custom sUAS applications in a high-fidelity 3D environment. The DRV Monitoring system collects runtime data from sUAS and the environment, analyzes compliance with safety properties, and captures violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T02:03:49Z)
• RADDLE: An Evaluation Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Robust Task-oriented Dialog Systems [75.87418236410296]
  We introduce the RADDLE benchmark, a collection of corpora and tools for evaluating the performance of models across a diverse set of domains. RADDLE is designed to favor and encourage models with a strong generalization ability. We evaluate recent state-of-the-art systems based on pre-training and fine-tuning, and find that grounded pre-training on heterogeneous dialog corpora performs better than training a separate model per domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T08:58:49Z)
• Integrated Benchmarking and Design for Reproducible and Accessible Evaluation of Robotic Agents [61.36681529571202]
  We describe a new concept for reproducible robotics research that integrates development and benchmarking. One of the central components of this setup is the Duckietown Autolab, a standardized setup that is itself relatively low-cost and reproducible. We validate the system by analyzing the repeatability of experiments conducted using the infrastructure and show that there is low variance across different robot hardware and across different remote labs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-09T15:31:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.